Re: Remove openh264?

Thanks for bringing this to my attention - I had no idea Fedora would let something so serious be unfixed for so long, as I kinda assumed Fedora is on top of security updates. Time to immediately delete openh264 indeed! However: Am 29.04.25 um 19:21 schrieb Leigh Scott: sudo dnf swap *\openh

Fedora Non-responsive maintainer check for v02460

Hi! It seems bugs for matrix-synapse get ignored (no response on any of them), it's chronically behind in versions, and the bug that it FTBFS in rawhide also got no response. Anybody in contact with v02460? The situation has been bad for quite a while already (the update history is that is w

Review request: feather

Hi! Could someone please review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053822? Happy to review your package in return! -- Jonathan -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fe

Re: Porting Fedora for the LoongArch architecture.

Is there still any work being done on this? I'm interested in running Fedora on LoongArch and helping with the porting efforts. I do have hardware as well (it's available on AliExpress, even outside of China). -- Jonathan -- ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

suspect everything will be fine if you can get python-qdarkstyle fixed. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2225768#c6 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220472 On 9/7/23 05:52, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: Unfortunately, it is worse than this: Electrum FTI in F39. A newer

Review swap: objfw

Hi! Would someone be willing to review swap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235768 with me? Thanks! -- Jonathan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

protobuf v4 incompatibilities in dependent packages. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/25 On Mon, Sep 4, 2023, at 2:39 PM, Jonathan Schleifer wrote: Am 04.09.23 um 17:10 schrieb Miro Hrončok: electrum  js, orphan   0 weeks

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Am 04.09.23 um 17:10 schrieb Miro Hrončok: electrum  js, orphan   0 weeks ago Electrum isn't orphaned, but cannot be updated because protobuf is not being updated. Newer versions require at least protobuf 3.20. I contacted the protobuf maintainer o

Has anyone seen hno?

Has anyone seen or knows how to contact hno? hno maintains electrum and is unresponsive on bugs, PRs and direct e-mails. He seems to be unresponsive for other packages as well: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__open__&email1=henrik%40henriknordstrom.net&emailassigned_to1=1&ema

Chromium security bugs remain unfixed for > 1 month

Hi! It looks like Chromium on Fedora is not receiving timely updates. It hasn't been updated in over a month and there were many bugs fixed upstream. At the very least, Chromium on Fedora is vulnerable to the following: CVE-2022-0452: Use after free in Safe Browsing. CVE-2022-0453: Use after

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Am 20.09.21 um 13:31 schrieb Miro Hrončok: 0ad  ignatenkobrain, orphan, pwalter   1 weeks ago I would be interested in becoming a (co)maintainer for this, but would need sponsorship. Also, how is the flatpak package handled? I know how it works for RPM, but flat

Self Introduction: Jonathan Schleifer

Hi! I started using Fedora a few month ago and it became my main system. Since open source also means contributing if I use something daily for me, here I am :). I'm also a pkgsrc developer where I maintain a few packages. Things I'll probably start with are a few packages that are in pkgsrc