This: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1461313#c54
Corresponds exactly to my symptoms.
Will follow, thank you!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
Hello!
After Fedora 33 upgrade, I am getting /var/log/audit/audit.log flooded with:
type=AVC msg=audit(1604285139.996:14767): avc: denied { read } for pid=5304
comm="rpm" name="rpmdb.sqlite" dev="dm-1" ino=4194322
scontext=system_u:system_r:setroubleshootd_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:object_r:va
Mhm okay, is there any reason you need such complicated machinery for getting
flatpaks available in Fedora? The point is, for me, the desktop sandboxing
capabilities, and specially when they'll actually be effective after the death
of X11-only applications eco-system wide.
The issue with Flatpa
I do hope you realize that if I'm digging into Koji, I do know how to install a
package with dnf and if I want to use flatpak, I do want to.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
> I don't have a machine of other than x86_64 so I can't test, but does this
> mean fedora's flatpak source is totally unavailable on secondary arches? Or
> I have any misunderstanding of flatpak image building?
It looks like it, but it shouldnt be hard to add aarch64 and ppc64le, just a
matter o
Hello!
I am looking for the place where Fedora flatpaks are built, as explained here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/flatpak/concepts/#_oci_images
I could find a koji task that builds one:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1520683 - and there we
can observe in orchest
