Change proposal for dnf in F41

.0   B |  00m00s Proposition: Please exchange "Erasing" by "Removing" Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 41 (Forty One) 6.11.0-63.fc41.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- ___ deve

some securirity issue in fc37, upgraded form fc36

The same problem exists in fc36. No such problems if doing the same procedure in a Cinnamon session. Anybody made the similar experience? Kind regards Joachim Backes Fedora release 37 (Thirty Seven) Kernel-5.19.13-300.fc37.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.

my fedora mailboxes are flooded by chinese junk mails

Could somebody please stop the chinese junkmail flood from sender "w w" to devel@lists.fedoraproject.org  ? Thanks -- Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six) Kernel-5.18.3-200.fc36.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.

F26 and kernel-4.13

Hi guys, my question: is it planned to make and release kernel-4.13 for F26? I saw that it has been declared as mainline and stable on kernel.org. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six) Kernel-4.12.9-300.fc26.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de

Re: where is /1 coming from?

is coming from? Additionally I see a file called /null with zero length! Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 25 (Twenty Five) Kernel-4.8.1-1.fc25.x86_64 Joachim Backes http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ devel mailin

Re: Locked memory limits are too low

ited file locks (-x) unlimite Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.7.4-200.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Why GUI software update tool is broken for me

when you update it after having launched it). What if you updating the bash? It's always running :-; Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 24 (Twenty Four) Kernel-4.5.7-300.fc24.x86_64 Joachim Backes http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraprojec

display state of package generation on KOJI

g* the package generation or the time when the generation has *finished* (with/without error), so one could guess the remaining time of package generation. I would be grateful for such an improvement. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.3-300.fc23.x86_

workstation/boot and workstation/netinst are identical

/x86_64/os/images/boot.iso], as indicated on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_23_Final_RC3_Installation?rd=Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Running cmp shows that the contents are identical, and the sizes are identical too! Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora

Re: Proposal: retire lesstif in f24 and beyond

is "grace" needing lesstif. -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.2-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http

Re: Proposal: retire lesstif in f24 and beyond

j I have have installed nedit on my F23 box, and this pkg needs lesstif, and it won't install with motif! Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.2-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fed

dnf upgrade won't upgrade, but yum-deprecated does!!

g yum-deprecated shows a lot of updates to be done! Why that difference? dnf bug? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.1-300.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes http://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: dnf output to STDOUT/STDERR

On 31.08.2015 09:54, Michal Luscon wrote: Would you mind filling a proper bugzilla report on bugzilla.redhat.com? Regards, Michal Luscon On 08/31/2015 08:16 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: Some dnf messages are not relevant to me, so I redirect STDERR to /dev/null if using dnf. But this has the

dnf output to STDOUT/STDERR

T and not to STDERR. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 23 (Twenty Three) Kernel-4.2.0-0.rc8.git3.1.fc23.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora C

Thunderbird-38.0.1 integrates lightning? Very disturbing!!

obsolete, I removed the extension, but then I get rid totally from the calendars. So my question: how t get the calendars running in TB without installing lightning from the moz. extension pages? Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two) Kernel-4.0.7-300.fc22.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www

Re: yumdownloader vs dnf??????

On 04/22/2015 05:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:52:54 +0200 > Joachim Backes wrote: > >> As yum has been replaced by dnf, there is a question for me: will >> yumdownloader (installed by yum-utils.rpm) be replaced by something >> like dnfdownloader (

yumdownloader vs dnf??????

As yum has been replaced by dnf, there is a question for me: will yumdownloader (installed by yum-utils.rpm) be replaced by something like dnfdownloader (installed for example by (a new) dnf-utils.rpm)? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 22 (Twenty Two) Kernel-4.0.0-1.fc22.x86_64

Renaming autocorr-*.rpm into libreoffice-autocorr-*.rpm

Hi all, because of the fact that the autocorr-* packages belong to libreoffice, why not rename them to libreoffice-autocorr-*? So this would reflect the connectivity with libreoffice. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 21 (Twenty One) Kernel-3.18.2-200.fc21.x86_64 Joachim Backes

Firefox webrtc support in F21?

Hi all, anybody knows if the webrtc support in firefox will be released in F21? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 21 (Twenty One) Kernel-3.17.6-300.fc21.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

syslinux-6.03

.fc21.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: gnome-sudoku in F21

On 09/13/2014 03:53 PM, Florian Müllner wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Joachim Backes > wrote: >> In gnome-sudoku (gnome-sudoku-3.13.90-3.fc21.x86_64) for F21 I'm missing >> the feature allowing to print multiple unsolved sudokus. > > You should use a us

gnome-sudoku in F21

Dear F21 developers, In gnome-sudoku (gnome-sudoku-3.13.90-3.fc21.x86_64) for F21 I'm missing the feature allowing to print multiple unsolved sudokus. This was possible in the previous Fedora version(s). Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 21 (Twenty One) Kernel-3.16.2-301

Web hit by OpenSSL 'Heartbleed' vulnerability

The recent f20 version of OPNSSL is openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20, so my question is when a secure version is released? Is this achieved by openssl-1.0.1e-37.fc20.1 I found on kojj? (See: http://www.bit-tech.net/news/bits/2014/04/08/openssl-heartbleed/1) Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora

Re: ANN Retiring pdftk for F20+

red. The support of this > technology is discontinued in Fedora Linux. Therefore you can't make > any successfuls builds for pdftk on Fedora Linux anymore. And what about pdfchain? Joachim Backes > Best Regards: > > Jochen Schmitt > __

Re: pdftk retired?

, provide binary as well as source rpms for >> pdftk 2.02, by the way. I might even look into packaging it but don't >> want to duplicate any existing efforts. >> >> Michael > > +1 > > pdftk is a very important package, so new (co)maintainers shouldn'

Koji down?

regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat): Kernel-3.9.9-302.fc19.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: bodhi client question

On 06/05/2013 02:37 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 10:58 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: --- Package x-4.1.0.0-4.beta1.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available

bodhi client question

"bodhi -D x." will download *all* and not only the locally installed pkgs. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat): Kernel-3.9.4-302.fc19.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes -- devel mailing list devel@list

Re: xv and F19

On 04/11/2013 04:57 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote: Joachim Backes wrote: Is it planned to provide F19 with xv? Actually it's not found. It should be available in rpmfusion-nonfree. rob Thanx Rob, I found it. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat): Kernel-

xv and F19

Is it planned to provide F19 with xv? Actually it's not found. Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat): Kernel-3.9.0-0.rc6.git0.1.fc19.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Recommended memory size for F19?

regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 18 (Spherical Cow): Kernel-3.8.6-203.fc18.x86_64 Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

F18: The sushi file previewer does not support the cinnamon desktop?

r cinnamon. Intentionally, or bug? Kind regards Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes PGP key ID: 0x1BB12F9E -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRB++CAAoJEKzGLy0bsS+eQD4H/RNrBekkbE0ulez45bi/M70n g8gf+PiObPkXjcMgfftRa3EUgX3oYat

Re: EXT4 Data Corruption Bug Hits Stable Linux Kernels

On 10/24/2012 01:19 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTIxNDQ > I got hit by this EXT4 bug with F18, kernel-3.6.3-2.x86_64.fc18 from koji. Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorap

Re: Macro L_cuserid missing in /usr/include/stdio.h in F17 ?

On 07/23/2012 08:03 AM, Brendan Jones wrote: > On 07/23/2012 07:56 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: >> #include >> #include >> main () { >> fprintf (stderr,"L_cuserid = %d",L_cuserid); >> } > Do you need to add -D_GNU_SOURCE to your compile lin

Macro L_cuserid missing in /usr/include/stdio.h in F17 ?

‘L_cuserid’ undeclared (first use in this function) x.c:4:34: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in The source compiles correctly if I use -D_XOPEN_SOURCE Kind regards -- Joachim Backes https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Desc

Re: usbview in F17 and /proc/bus/usb

On 03/25/2012 05:06 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 03/25/2012 02:04 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: >> Hi, >> >> trying to run usbview in F17 (alpha) fails because of >> >> "Cannot open /proc/bus/usb/devices" >> >> I think, usbview should be reorga

usbview in F17 and /proc/bus/usb

Hi, trying to run usbview in F17 (alpha) fails because of "Cannot open /proc/bus/usb/devices" I think, usbview should be reorganized by using /sys/bus/usb -- Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- devel ma

aggregation of gnome tools

is a tendency for creating more and more such tools. It would be very helpful for the user if such tools could be aggregated to a *homogenous* and gui based tool so I have not to think about which one to use. All comments are welcome. Kind regards -- Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de

pdfedit

Hi, in F15 I could install pdfedit by yum. Anybody knows when this will be possible in F16? Kind regards Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Current F16 update problems with gnome-panel-libs-3.0.2-4.fc16.x86_64 (BZ 731617)

Hi, since days it's not possible to update my F16 system fully (a lot of updates are refused because of dependency problems [see BZ 731617]). Anybody knows if the problem will be solved? All help is welcome. Kind regards Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smim

Re: Samsung ml printers

openprinting-splix-2.0.0-2lsb3.2.x86_64.rpm (I guess, you meant this), my printer ML-1660 (USB attached) is not found in the database, so it is not operable, although I had loaded the kernel module usblp.ko. Sorry. Kind regards -- Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes

Samsung ml printers

en it is fully operable. Additionally, no splix package available in F15. On the other hand, the attach process in *Ubuntu 11.04* leaves a fully operable printer without any need for interaction. Why this difference? -- Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Descripti

Re: F14 Question: AVerMedia AVerTV Volar Black HD/-A850 availability

ree. My impression: it worked in F12. See http://fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=236155 Kind regards -- Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

F14 Question: AVerMedia AVerTV Volar Black HD/-A850 availability

e-problems. == So I copied dvb-usb-af9015.fw from some UBUNTU installation to /lib/firmware, and I could watch digital TV with kaffeine. So my question: would it be possible to support that stick in >= F15 versions? Kind regards -- Joachim

Re: What does the DVD media check if installing a new Fedora version? / Proposal

On 08/13/10 10:32, Joachim Backes wrote: > Hi, > > having the following question: What does the DVD/CD media check exactly > if booting a Fedora DVD/CD? Is it the sha256sum? If yes, why this media > check, because it could be done after having burned the DVD? > > If n

What does the DVD media check if installing a new Fedora version? / Proposal

DVD (means: can I start the media check from that freshly burned DVD?) Proposal: If not, it would be nice if the media checker would be placed on the DVD for running in normal mode after the DVD has burned - perhaps allowing to check both an i386 and x86_64 install DVD. Kind regards -- Joachim

Re: F14TC2 x86_64 problem

On 08/06/10 09:19, Joachim Backes wrote: > On 08/05/10 15:37, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: >> On 08/05/2010 09:06 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a way around this problem? >>> >>> I'm trying to install from DVD the TC2 image o

Re: F14TC2 x86_64 problem

d 62090.img to a floppy as described, but after having answered in anaconda the question for updates media to /dev/fd0, it is rejected by anaconda (no valid updates media). Seems that I'm doing something wrong. -- Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Alpha TC1 Is Available Now!

uilding everything with python 2.7 but > that should have beed fixed in python-2.7-4. > > Thomas I wrote a bug report (620354). Python seems to be: python 2.7. -- Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- deve

Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13

r management: ts Regards Joachim Backes http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel