Re: Is 50+ RPM Subpackages too extreme?

Your reply completely lacks any point. Why is TeX Live the best example of what to avoid when packaging in Fedora? Having 50+ subpackages is perfectly justified once there is a reason why. For TeX Live it is that upstream (CTAN) actually maintains package dependencies and they do add and remove pa

Re: jnovy pushed to mc (master). "- just keep perl-interpreter BR because of man2hlp, (..more)"

Hi all, decided to disable aspell support in mc as a whole. Note it is disabled by default configure option in mc anyway. A beneficial side effect is we have now even smaller dependency footprint and the annoying message while editing *any* file goes away without aspell + friends installed. This

Re: jnovy pushed to mc (master). "- just keep perl-interpreter BR because of man2hlp, (..more)"

Adding Nikola. Nikola, is it intended that aspell doesn't depend on any dictionary? E.g. aspell-en? Please see the email bellow. Thanks, Jindrich On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:14 PM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 15:30, Jindrich Novy wrote: > [..] > >> BTW m

Re: jnovy pushed to mc (master). "- just keep perl-interpreter BR because of man2hlp, (..more)"

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 3:21 PM Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 13:28, Jindrich Novy wrote: > >> Hi Tomasz, >> >> > On top of removing perl-generators which add for mc proper perl modules >> dependencies for >> > patchfs >> >>

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

Hi, it's quite new feature in rpmbuild: http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Autosetup I.e. since rpm-4.11. Cheers, Jindrich On Jul 13, 2015 1:40 PM, "Marcin Juszkiewicz" wrote: > Hi > > When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed that > there is no such thing as patch m

Texlive packaging (Was: A proposal for Fedora updates)

> On 03/27/2015 05:22 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >* However, I'll note that the recent texlive updates were security as *> >* well. ;) *> > If texlive packaging is causing issues with update pushes, could maybe > ask the texlive maintainers to rework the packaging? TeXLive packager says: No, sorry.

Re: BuildRequires for texlive stuff for F18 and beyond

xextra and > texlive-collection-fontsextra Actually this would make bigger sense. I'm not a big fan of making the dependencies wider though. Could you please file a bug for it? Jindrich > > Jonathan. -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo

Re: Re: BuildRequires for texlive stuff for F18 and beyond

just install: texlive-scheme-full and you needn't to care about any deps at all. Jindrich > > If it is not easy (well, why is it difficult?) to make latex launch > yum to install dependencies, maybe we can ship a script to generate > the RPM dependencies, similar to yum-builddep. &

Re: BuildRequires for texlive stuff for F18 and beyond

Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved === Package Arch Version Repository Size === Installing: texlive-timesnoarch

Re: BuildRequires for texlive stuff for F18 and beyond

=== Installing: texlive-timesnoarch2:svn28614.0-13.fc18 updates384 k Transaction Summary === Install 1 Package Total download size:

Re: Detecting soname bumps

; Orion Poplawski > Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 > NWRA, Boulder Office FAX: 303-415-9702 > 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com > Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com > -- > devel mailing list > deve

Re: upcoming libdb/db4/compat-db reorganization

e let me know. Try to rebuild your package against libdb-5. If everything is rebuildable and fully functional with libdb-5.x then we don't even need a libdb4 package. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo žen

Re: upcoming libdb/db4/compat-db reorganization

Hi Petr, On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 06:57:11AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2012-04-17, Jindrich Novy wrote: > > it seems to be the right time to do an unification/reorganization of > > Oracle (Berkeley) DB packages in rawhide. > [...] > > What I'm planning to do is ge

upcoming libdb/db4/compat-db reorganization

7;m unable to reveal dlopen() or similar deps in packages so if your package requires older libdb I plan to remove and can not be rebuilt against newer libdb then please speak up! Thanks, Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je,

libdb-5.3.15 update with soname bump

Hi all, very soon I'm going to update libdb to 5.3.15 in rawhide. Thanks, Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je vůl. --- Jan W

license change - Midnight Commander

Hi, I was notified by upstream that Midnight Commander (mc) has changed its license to GPLv3+ since the latest release - 4.8.0. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal

On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:26:11PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan tetex-tex4ht Taken. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in rawhide

On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan TeXmacs Grabbed. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je

Re: Package texlive-release is missing from TeXLive repository

ld be in place now. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je vůl. --- Jan Werich -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedor

Re: Package texlive-release is missing from TeXLive repository

.org/texlive/packages.f15/texlive-release-2010-14.20110113.fc15.noarch.rpm > Trying other mirror. It is now fixed. Just please do "yum clean all" and "yum update" again. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je,

Re: xz-5.0.0 in rawhide + soname bump

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:36:47AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:02:41AM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: > > The new xz-5.0.0-3 with a new xz-compat-libs subpackage containing > > liblzma.so.0* libraries is just built. This should solve the chicken > >

Re: xz-5.0.0 in rawhide + soname bump

ta so it should serve to apps requiring old compression settings well. Thanks for patience, Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je

xz-5.0.0 in rawhide + soname bump

l be built with the new xz-5.0.0. Cheers, Jindrich -- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je vůl. --- Jan Werich -- devel mai

Re: Oracle DB 5.0.21 in rawhide soon

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:39:10PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: > Good point. Maybe it is the right time to drop the db package > naming scheme completely and introduce new package "libdb" and leave the db4 > as is in the 4.8.26 state. > > I'm on it. Just for the

Re: Oracle DB 5.0.21 in rawhide soon

On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:02:37PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 06/04/10 08:59, Jindrich Novy wrote: > Does this mean that db4-devel buildreqs will need changing to either > db5-devel or compat-db? Good point. Maybe it is the right time to drop the db package naming scheme compl

Oracle DB 5.0.21 in rawhide soon

-- Jindrich Novyhttp://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel