On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 11:39 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone heard from kanarip or able to contact him?
>
Most people do hear from kanarip at undetermined intervals -- and my
@fedoraproject.org address works just fine -- I have no messages from
you.
I'm also on IRC, where people
On Saturday, April 14, 2012 03:11:46 PM Rex Dieter wrote:
> No need for this to be mutually exclusive, unless one (or both) of you
> are averse to being comaintainers?
>
I'm objecting based on the matters of principle and due process.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
--
Sys
hadowman *not* be forcefully made the owner of
the package, and the reporter of the review request be granted ownership.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696#c114
--
Systems Architect, Kolab Systems AG
e: vanmeeuwen at kolabsys.com
m: +44
Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:38:20AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > I'll ping Jeroen in the meantime, but we are both very busy with out
> > dayjob.
>
> In that case approving one or all of the three people who have requested
> commit access seems sensible.
Which package i
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Good to have you back!
>
I'm still busy elsewhere. I was pointed in the direction of this thread by
someone else.
Consider those ACL requests that I could find approved.
--
Kind regards,
-- kanarip
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I'm following the procedure at:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen van Meeuwen? He is not answering
> e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzi
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 07:09:19PM +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
wrote:
> > while you're thinking about what to do in the area of virt-clone /
> > cloning VMs, I recon it would be nice not only to be able to clone
> > VMs that
On 02/27/2010 04:21 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 26 February 2010 22:54, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> - If stable pushes were more restricted, perhaps that would get us more
>> testing? If someone required a newer version and could easier
>> install/test from updates-testing and provide feedback, don
On 02/12/2010 10:45 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> I'd like to propose moving comps to fedorahosted git.
> Why? Because CVS is a pain.
>
> I can work on fixing the automated releng tasks that use comps.
>
> What I'd like to know is if doing this at some point over the
> next few weeks (say, post-Al
