Re: Ownership of NVML

Hi, Emanuel, Emanuel Lima writes: > I would like to take ownership of the nvml package, which was recently > orphaned, because kata-containers depends on it. Out of curiosity, what depends on nvml? The kata-containers packages does not appear to. I saw reference to nvml in the configure-hyper

Re: Which I/O scheduler is Fedora switching to in 4.21? mq-deadline or BFQ?

Chris Murphy writes: > [root@fnuc ~]# cat /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler > noop deadline [cfq] > [root@fnuc ~]# insmod > /usr/lib/modules/4.19.8-300.fc29.x86_64/kernel/block/bfq.ko.xz > [root@fnuc ~]# lsmod | grep bfq > bfq69632 0 > [root@fnuc ~]# cat /sys/block/sda/queue/sch

Re: Which I/O scheduler is Fedora switching to in 4.21? mq-deadline or BFQ?

Chris Murphy writes: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 11:34 AM Jeff Moyer wrote: >> >> stan writes: >> >> > On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:24:21 +0100 >> > Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> > >> >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 04:30:20PM -0700, stan wrote: &

Re: Which I/O scheduler is Fedora switching to in 4.21? mq-deadline or BFQ?

stan writes: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:24:21 +0100 > Tomasz Torcz wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 04:30:20PM -0700, stan wrote: > >> > Enabled deadline and cfq again, but still no bfq available. >> > $ cat /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler >> > noop deadline [cfq] >> >> Those are single-que

Re: Which I/O scheduler is Fedora switching to in 4.21? mq-deadline or BFQ?

Hi, Chris Murphy writes: > Really Readding devel@ this time... > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:08 AM stan wrote: >> >> On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 11:48:29 - >> "Alan Jenkins" wrote: >> >> > [3] BFQ: >> > http://algo.ing.unimo.it/people/paolo/disk_sched/description.php >> > >> > [4] >> > https://un

Re: RFC: static builds for user emulators in Fedora QEMU RPMs

"Daniel P. Berrange" writes: > More typical though is that you have a directory containing an fullish > install tree of a non-native architecture and you just want to chroot > into that. When doing such a chroot, the qemu-$ARCH emulator must be > present inside the chroot too. ie the x86_64 build

Re: mounted external ext4 causes "high" kworker cpu

Chris Murphy writes: > On Apr 27, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > >> Chris Murphy writes: >> >>> Normally top reports CPU line, sy at 0.4% when idle. If I format an >>> external Firewire disk as btrfs and mount it, it remains at 0.4%. If I >>

Re: mounted external ext4 causes "high" kworker cpu

Chris Murphy writes: > Normally top reports CPU line, sy at 0.4% when idle. If I format an > external Firewire disk as btrfs and mount it, it remains at 0.4%. If I > reformat as XFS and mount it, again top reports sy at 0.4%. However, > if I reformat as ext4 and mount it, sy runs at 3.5%. These t

Re: [ANNOUNCE] bfq disk I/O scheduler

Paolo Valente writes: > I hope this is the right list for announcing this work. LKML would be a better place for you to propose new I/O schedulers. Cheers, Jeff -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Ext4 + barriers=1 + ssd + power loss while commiting to a git repo = broken repo?

Ric Wheeler writes: > On 04/14/2011 05:19 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> Michał Piotrowski writes: >> >>> W dniu 14 kwietnia 2011 11:04 użytkownik Andreas Schwab >>> napisał: Michał Piotrowski writes: > But the question remains - should enabled barriers protect against > such

Re: F15 ext4 discard option - why not default?

Michał Piotrowski writes: > 2011/3/16 Jeff Moyer : >> Out of curiosity, what SSD do you have? > > ocz vertex 2 OK, haven't tested those. Cheers, Jeff -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F15 ext4 discard option - why not default?

Michał Piotrowski writes: > W dniu 16 marca 2011 18:55 użytkownik Ric Wheeler > napisał: >> On 03/16/2011 01:53 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I installed F15 on SSD and I noticed that file systems are not mounted >>> with discard option. >>> Shouldn't "discard" option be enab