On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 12:34 PM Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 12:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 05. 12. 24 11:57, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:30 PM Jaroslav Škarvada
> > > wrote:
> > >>
&g
On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 12:05 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 05. 12. 24 11:57, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:30 PM Jaroslav Škarvada
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 6:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>>
> >>
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:30 PM Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 6:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 04. 11. 24 17:26, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > > I am going to add compat Tcl/Tk 8.6 packages, because IMHO porting of
> > > the packag
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 6:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 04. 11. 24 17:26, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > I am going to add compat Tcl/Tk 8.6 packages, because IMHO porting of
> > the packages to Tcl/Tk 9 will take significant time and maybe some of
> > the packages will n
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 2:36 PM Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 5:32 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 07:50:38AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 03:35:38PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> &g
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 5:32 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 07:50:38AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 03:35:38PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 03:16:13PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > This is a weird one:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:32 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> > That's not how standards work. It's behaviour undefined by the
> > standard, i.e. undefined behaviour. If it isn't forbidden, or strictly
> > defined, it's still standard compliant.
>
> I think we'll have to agree to disagree.
On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 12:59 PM Kilian Hanich via devel
wrote:
>
> Am 06.11.24 um 11:32 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> >> That's not how standards work. It's behaviour undefined by the
> >> standard, i.e. undefined behaviour. If it isn't forbidden, or strictly
> >> defined, it's still stan
> > > > > > > On 11/4/24 7:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > > > > > > Oof ... the fact that tuned mangles bootloader parameters wasn't
> > > > > > > > mentioned at all in the Change Proposal to enable it by
> > > > > > > > default. To me
> > > > > > > > that would have been a no-go. (I already
On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 12:04 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 05:06:34PM +0100, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 4:31 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 4:20 PM Jaroslav Škarvada
>
I am going to add compat Tcl/Tk 8.6 packages, because IMHO porting of
the packages to Tcl/Tk 9 will take significant time and maybe some of
the packages will never be ported. But IMHO it will also require
changes in the affected packages, at least changing the BuildRequires
to the compat Tcl/Tk ver
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 4:31 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 4:20 PM Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 3:02 PM Ian Pilcher wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/4/24 7:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > > Oof ... t
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 3:02 PM Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> On 11/4/24 7:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Oof ... the fact that tuned mangles bootloader parameters wasn't
> > mentioned at all in the Change Proposal to enable it by default. To me
> > that would have been a no-go. (I already voted -1 for
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 5:23 PM Keith Seitz wrote:
>
> On 10/14/24 9:55 AM, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > List of packages that tailed to compile with Tcl/Tk 9.0.0 follows:
> >
> > blt
> > brltty
> > cgnslib
> > classified-ads
> > deal
> > eggd
On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 5:20 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 10. 24 18:55, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
> > 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
>
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 9:39 PM Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 8:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 14. 10. 24 18:55, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the lat
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 8:14 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 14. 10. 24 18:55, Jaroslav Škarvada wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
> > 9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
>
Hi,
I would like to rebase Tcl/Tk in rawhide (f42) to the latest stable
9.0.0 release. Unfortunately, there are several incompatibilities [1]
and several applications will require porting. I will create side-tag
and bugs for individual packages. For the preliminary testing there
are Tcl/Tk SRPMs a
Hi,
I would like to step-out from raptor maintenance [1] and orphan it.
Currently, raptor is obsoleted by raptor2 and IMHO unsupported. It
seems it's required only by the COPASI package in Fedora
thanks & regards
Jaroslav
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/raptor
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
