Re: F42 Change Proposal: DNF5 Expired Keys (System-Wide)

Hello Clemens, Thank you as well for supporting the proposal! Does this mean that after switching to a more strict crypto-policy, the > next run would remove (or propose to remove) keys that are no longer > considered secure under that crypto-policy? Although this wasn’t the main intent of the

Re: F42 Change Proposal: DNF5 Expired Keys (System-Wide)

Hi Zbyszek, Thank you for your interest in this proposal! I'd like to see behaviour where keys for EOL releases are removed as > soon as possible. I.e. if I have upgraded to F42, but still have a > package from F39, then keep the key for F39 so that rpm doesn't > faceplant. But as soon as I remov

Re: DNF5 CVE-2024-1929 is it fixed?

Hi Barry, I believe this can be closed as it was already fixed in February. I've added context in the ticket and asked the assignee to proceed with closing. Regards, Jan On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 5:49 PM Barry Scott wrote: > We got a question about CVE-2024-1929 on discuss.fedora.org < > http://d

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF5 (system-wide)

Jan On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 4:59 PM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Jan Kolarik writes: > > >[...] > > The dnf-automatic command will still be available, now provided as a > > plugin and functionally compatible with dnf4. Although the > > configuration files' location

dnf5 default switch and soname bump in Rawhide

Hi, Given the positive feedback on the testing side-tag , this is now moving into the stable along with the soname bump. Thanks for the feedback, everyone! Jan -- ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

date under testing). I fixed that, and now the tests pass. > Great, thanks! Regards, Jan On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 8:20 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2024-04-24 at 22:56 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-04-25 at 07:42 +0200, Jan Kolarik wrote: > > > Hello everyo

Re: Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

side-tag :) However, as I mentioned earlier, it hasn't been thoroughly tested yet; that's our goal for the upcoming months. Regards, Jan On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 7:55 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 11:42:57AM GMT, Jan Kolarik wrote: > > Hello Michael, > >

Re: Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

I hope no harm has been done yet. That's actually the purpose of this side-tag, to identify any gaps we may have missed while working on the switch. The 5.2.0.0 API changes aren't significant, there are though many ABI-breaking changes. Thanks, Jan On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 5:29 PM Maxwel

Re: Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

l installed packages are fully updated. Jan On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:22 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: > Jan Kolarik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-04-25 07:42:10: > > Hello everyone, > > > > We've prepared a side-tag for testing Rawhide with dnf5 as the default > > packa

Re: Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

Hi Mattia, Yep, there's a dnf5-testing COPR that serves exactly this purpose: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rpmsoftwaremanagement/dnf5-testing. Jan On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:10 AM Mattia Verga via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Il 25/04/24 07:42,

Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

Hello everyone, We've prepared a side-tag for testing Rawhide with dnf5 as the default package manager. Instructions for installing the packages from the side-tag can be found at the following link [1]. Please provide feedback in Bodhi or on this mailing list regarding the use cases you're famili

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF5 (system-wide)

Hi guys, the dnf-automatic command will be obsoleted. > Oh, sorry about that. This portion of the text was inadvertently altered during the review process. I've already corrected the text on the wiki. The dnf-automatic command will still be available, now provided as a plugin and functionally co

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

stack should be removed in Fedora 43. Jan On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 10:04 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 26. 03. 24 v 8:02 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 06:39:35AM +0100, Jan Kolarik wrote: > >> Previously, I had issues that migration from DNF

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

later. Regards, Jan On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:11 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:46:47PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > == Summary == > > Change the default package manager from dnf to dnf5. > > > > == Owner ==

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Switch to DNF 5 (System-Wide)

Hello Vit, I don't understand this. So if GS going to use DNF, therefore the same > cache etc, or not? Or what other metadata PackageKit downloads on top of > DNF? > Yes, it will ultimately utilize the same cache. The paragraph you referenced is extracted from the "Early access for developmental

Re: dnf-4.19.0 without filelists in Rawhide soon

th dnf5 at the moment, and there's already a tracking issue for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263771. Jan On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:09 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > /usr/bin/BINARYNAME is part of the primary metadata AFAIK > > > Vít > > > Dne 14. 02. 24 v

Re: dnf-4.19.0 without filelists in Rawhide soon

4, 2024 at 10:42 AM Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 9.02.2024 o 14:02, Jan Kolarik pisze: > > Just a heads up that a new DNF version (4.19.0) is on its way to Rawhide > > and is expected to land within the next several hours. This update > > brings a system-wide change &

Re: dnf-4.19.0 without filelists in Rawhide soon

? Regards, Jan On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 4:29 PM Florian Weimer wrote: > * Jan Kolarik: > > > From a Fedora user perspective, there won't be any changes in the way > > you operate the DNF package manager. The only difference is that > > typically there will be less met

dnf-4.19.0 without filelists in Rawhide soon

Hello everyone, Just a heads up that a new DNF version (4.19.0) is on its way to Rawhide and is expected to land within the next several hours. This update brings a system-wide change related to not downloading filelists metadata by