Miro Hrončok wrot
Done. But maybe the Fedora maintainers were never interested in EPEL?
Should the assignee be set to orphan instead?
Thanks Miro!
The main assignees for both packages have pushed EPEL builds before, so
they have at least had interest in the past.
--
Jamie Nguyen
Ben Cotton wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 2:34 AM Jamie Nguyen wrote:
Could someone please set the Bugzilla Assignee for EPEL for both
packages to match the main Bugzilla Assignee?
It looks like you're still the EPEL assignee in dist-git. I could make
the change in Bugzilla, but it wil
Hi,
I was wondering if someone could help me.
I stopped (co-)maintaining weechat and adobe-source-code-pro-fonts
several years ago, but I discovered I'm still listed as the Bugzilla
Assignee for EPEL on both packages [1][2] despite not have commit
access. (FAS username: jamielinux)
I contac
Hi Tom,
Thank you for your tireless nodejs packaging over the years!
I vaguely recall trading tens and tens of nodejs package reviews with
you back when Fedora's nodejs ecosystem was rapidly growing.
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
jamielinu
Also orphaned after speaking with co-maintainers:
- ycssmin
Kind regards,
Jamie
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedorapro
Hi,
This is a follow up for this post:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RR2KB64SGUM7IJKBSQORQGZGUSROPFHD/
Below are the packages I've orphaned. See section [d] of the linked
email to see how many times each package is listed as Requires by
som
Hi Joe,
On 01/11/2019 07:06, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 06:38:47PM +0100, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> It's been incredible to part of this project and community! :-)
>>
>> Once upon a time I was an (over?)enthusiastic packager and it's left me
>>
I've been responding privately to people stepping up, to reduce noise.
Thank you to everyone who has volunteered so far :-)
FYI, nginx and tor/torsocks have new owners now. Felix (heffer) and
Marcel (maha) respectively.
Kind regards,
--
Jamie N
Of course, just after I post, I find I've somehow missed three packages:
These go in list [d] (depended on by other packages at runtime):
nodejs-shelljs: 4
nodejs-walkdir: 1
This goes in list [f] (not depended on by anything):
nodejs-sha
Kind regards,
--
Jamie N
uest (tomh)
nodejs-send (tomh)
nodejs-should (tomh)
nodejs-sntp (jsmith)
nodejs-superagent (piotrp)
nodejs-tape (tomh)
nodejs-temp (piotrp)
nodejs-underscore (dcallagh)
nodejs-utile (piotrp)
nodejs-vows (tomh)
nodejs-winston (piotrp)
nodejs-with (tomh)
--
Jamie Nguyen
__
Hi Jason,
Thanks for that :-)
Sounds like I don't need to file a bug report. (Though I guess I'll be
watching ansible runs more closely, since /etc seems to be fair game.)
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
___
devel mailing lis
in the
guidelines somewhere?
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_configuration_files
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapr
On 05/06/16 17:43, Antonio Trande wrote:
> I'm taking python-testify.
Thanks, Antonio! :-)
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
take them!
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 29/01/16 07:24, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I think it was a releng snafu. From #fedora-releng today:
>
> masta / lmacken: tons of ejected from push messages. Perhaps because
> you did one and another one right away or something?
> nirik: yeah, most likely
> * lmacken should have suggested doin
Hi,
This update for 3 Nginx CVEs was auto-submitted to stable yesterday:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fd3428577d
I got this error message:
nginx-1.8.1-1.fc23 ejected from the push because 'Request --RAW HTML
NOT ALLOWED-- inconsistent with mash request --RAW HTML NOT
On 28/01/16 19:00, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Well, this kind of question would probibly be better on the epel-devel
> list
Ah, I forgot about epel-devel.
> And you can ask for an exception. This would entail pushing the new
> version to testing and leaving it there a while, mailing epel-announce
> to
On 28/01/16 10:10, Neal Gompa wrote:
> I personally think you should. EPEL isn't supposed to unreasonably
> hold back when even the upstream project no longer maintains that
> version. As long as all consumers of the nginx package are
> appropriately updated (if necessary) and the transition notes
Hi,
Distributions like RHEL and Debian have a very strict update policy (for
good reason). People expect stability and don't want surprises.
When CVEs arise, patches can often be backported. Nginx 1.8.1 recently
fixed three CVEs and I've backported to Nginx 1.6.x on EL7.
Unfortunately, Nginx 1.0
Hi all,
Three CVEs were fixed in Nginx 1.8.1. I'd be very grateful for some
karma for the following updates.
(I pushed updates for them yesterday, but unfortunately the RPMs still
haven't hit updates-testing so you'll have to manually download the
nginx.rpm and nginx-filesystem.rpm from koji.)
F
On 08/12/15 16:07, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Unfortunately, I don't think this is possible until the Red Hat
> maintainer for libunwind bumps the Release.
>
> RHEL = libunwind-1.1-5
> EPEL = libunwind-1.1-10
>
> If I introduce libunwind-1.1-0.5 then it doesn't mess
On 08/12/15 08:58, Paul Howarth wrote:
> It's not a different version. It's an exact clone of the RHEL package
> except with "0." in front of the release to make sure the RHEL package
> "wins" where it is available. It is in fact the official EPEL
> limited-arch package policy:
>
> https://fedorap
On 07/12/15 15:33, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> So, in the general case of packages being retired from EPEL7 because
>> they have moved to RHEL, how do we avoid missing packages in the future?
>
> What is the issue with the
On 07/12/15 14:59, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> So, in the general case of packages being retired from EPEL7 because
>> they have moved to RHEL, how do we avoid missing packages in the future?
>
> Could make a compat package in EPEL7 be an option?
> This way you introduce back the version that was
Hi!
libunwind package is now part of RHEL 7.2. It got retired from EPEL7
three days ago (and incidentally the Release went backwards so upgrade
path is broken):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288313
Unfortunately, that leaves CentOS users in a bit of a pickle, as
libunwind is no
On 23/11/15 16:31, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> I don't think there are any official guidelines about ACL etiquette, but
>> the approach I've always taken before requesting ACLs is to first post a
>> comment on b
On 23/11/15 14:50, Richard Shaw wrote:
> This is not about any particular instance, but browsing around pkgdb for
> various reasons I've run across ACL/pkgdb request that haven't gotten
> approved (or rejected). I know we all get busy but it's not right to ignore
> (intentionally or not) these requ
uot; or "jpo" who are the
active maintainers.
[1]
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?buildStart=0&packageID=2593
--
Jamie Nguyen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
branches like
> master-devel, f20-devel, etc that store pending changes?
Committing spec changes without a subsequent build is a perfectly
reasonable thing to do. When doing spec clean-up, I would normally bump
the Release tag and add a changelog entry. This is essentially what
happens when packag
Next update across all Fedora branches plus EL6 changes the license from
BSD (nodejs-read-installed-0.2.3) to ISC
(nodejs-read-installed-0.2.4).
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora
Next update across all Fedora branches plus EL6 changes the license from
BSD (nodejs-read-package-json-1.1.1) to ISC
(nodejs-read-package-json-1.1.3).
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Next update across all Fedora branches plus EL6 changes the license from
MIT (nodejs-slide 1.1.4) to ISC (nodejs-slide 1.1.5).
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
On 25/07/13 09:03, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 07/25/2013 10:52 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The spec in question:
>> http://jamielinux.fedorapeople.org/strongswan.spec
>>
>> The lines in question:
>> %configure --disable-static \
>>
using a triple backslash (\\\) which I've seen
used in some specs but never really understood if it's really needed or
not. It didn't fix the problem though:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5654592
Any ideas?
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
e available in the server error log.
> Apache/2.2.15 (Red Hat) Server at koji.fedoraproject.org Port 80
"Storage migration"
http://status.fedoraproject.org/
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001176.html
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
ime into improving my own update
messages, so thanks for these examples!
It's important to put yourself in the shoes of the user. Does the user
have enough information to:
1) determine the nature of the changes?
2) determine how major the changes are?
3) make a relatively informed decision about whether to update?
For many of my previous updates, the message was just "update to
upstream release 1.2.3", which the user can't use to answer any of the
above questions.
All of your update messages above seem to satisfy this criteria, so in
my eyes they look good :-)
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
any of our official repositories, though
I believe the gstreamer1-libav package uses libav instead of ffmpeg.
Most of our other media-related software is built with ffmpeg, not libav.
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
MIT to BSD
accordingly, and contains a copy of the updated LICENSE.
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
th SELinux set to enforcing, only
> disabling it occasionally to do specific tasks or when investigating
> permissions problems.
>
> Rich.
I agree. Years ago pretty much every single Fedora guide would recommend
disabling SELinux, but these days (after years of refining the default
p
On 28/02/13 14:49, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 28 February 2013 14:18, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> I've already applied the 20 patch series in git, but before pushing any
>> updates out I want to make sure things really are in good shape, and
>> will make further changes a
ch patch
in the series, so the reviewer may alternatively choose to review each
patch individually.
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 27/02/13 18:03, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Enrico,
>
> I want to clarify that my whitespace changes were an attempt to make the
> spec more legible for everyone, not myself. I also feel it would have
> been "nicer" for you to ask me to revert the changes rather than
On 10/02/13 13:12, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Jamie Nguyen writes:
>
>> Thanks very much for adding me as a co-maintainer. I guess that you
>> probably don't have much time for updating the Tor package, so I'm glad
>> to be on board and will be taking a very active
On 25/02/13 10:38, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:07:10 +0000, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> $ fedpkg switch-branch f18
>> Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch f18
>>
>>> Jon Ciesla has canceled Jamie Nguyen
>>> 's re
tch_branch: Unknown remote branch f18
The message on the bug report says:
> Complete, clearing flag.
It turns out the SCM request may have been cancelled half-way or something:
> Jon Ciesla has canceled Jamie Nguyen
> 's request for fedora-cvs:
> Bug 910142: Review R
On 16/02/13 01:55, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le vendredi 15 février 2013 à 23:04 +0000, Jamie Nguyen a écrit :
>> I'm trying to contact the maintainer of python-sleekxmpp to request to
>> co-maintain (as it's a bit out of date). Emails to his/her FAS email
>> addres
ly
form of communication on offer:
User: louizatakk, Name: None, email: lo...@louiz.org, Creation:
2008-04-22, IRC Nick: None, Timezone: None, Locale: None, GPG
Approved Groups: cla_fedora cla_done fedorabugs cvsl10n packager cla_fpca
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing
as painful as rubygems
packaging, complete with vast arrays of specific versioned dependencies...
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/02/13 21:33, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu 07 Feb 2013 02:26:48 PM EST, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> On 07/02/13 19:24, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>>> Now that I'm a bit more familiar with node.js packaging (ie,
>>> never even looked at node.js before this week...), I&
On 07/02/13 19:24, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> Now that I'm a bit more familiar with node.js packaging (ie, never even
> looked at node.js before this week...), I'll take it.
>
> I don't currently have any packages for you to review, so you get off
> scot-free. Well, fo
aging (ie, never even
looked at node.js before this week...), I'll take it.
I don't currently have any packages for you to review, so you get off
scot-free. Well, for now at least ;)
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
oject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/bashmount
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ommand-line).
I've not used it in a while, nor have I had the time/motivation to port
to udisks2 (which has been bottom of my TODO list for some years). I'll
likely orphan it. Does orphaning it on rawhide also remove it from the
repository?
Thanks.
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mai
me package
cleanup tasks lined up and will be closing the security bugs on our
bugzilla very soon.
Thanks again.
(Also cc'd to fedora-devel to inform the public that any recent problems
with the package should hopefully now be history :)
Kind regards,
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mai
On 27/01/13 16:54, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>
>> Please could testers give some karma:
>>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-14650/tor-0.2.2.39-1700.fc17?_csrf_token=3663fa7adec7f8e5c46ed89b7a0b59cfab9844d9
>
On 27/01/13 12:00, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 27.01.2013 12:54, schrieb Jamie Nguyen:
>> Please could testers give some karma:
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-14650/tor-0.2.2.39-1700.fc17?_csrf_token=3663fa7adec7f8e5c46ed89b7a0b59cfab9844d9
>
push the update
without enough karma (despite even critical path updates only requiring
14-days without negative karma before they can be pushed):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903515
--
Jamie Nguyen
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
> --alec
Being able to track changes is very useful.
I've seen on a few occasions reviewers mention that they can't tell what
has changed in the spec since the previous version, as the new packager
has overwritten the previous spec.
I've also seen reviewers ask the new package
John5342:
> Ok. Ignore me. FAS clearly shows you are in the group but for some reason
> admin.fedoraproject.org/community doesn't show you in the group. Will see
> about filing a bug shortly.
OK, ignore my reply to your earlier post!
Kind regards,
Jamie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedor
John5342:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Having some trouble for this package review request:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877705
>>
>> It has been approved, but I can't set the fedor
Kevin Fenzi:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:29:10 +
> Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>
>> I had a conversation with (IIRC) Kevin Fenzi about this a few months
>> back. He did some magic to let me use jamielinux@fedoraproject for my
>> bugzilla account, and I was under the imp
Jamie Nguyen:
> Hi all,
>
> Having some trouble for this package review request:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877705
>
> It has been approved, but I can't set the fedora-cvs flag. This has
> worked in the past, but maybe something to do with different e
Dan Horák:
> Jamie Nguyen píše v Pá 23. 11. 2012 v 15:05 +:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Having some trouble for this package review request:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877705
>>
>> It has been approved, but I can't set the fedora-cvs fla
Hi all,
Having some trouble for this package review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877705
It has been approved, but I can't set the fedora-cvs flag. This has
worked in the past, but maybe something to do with different email
addresses:
FAS email: j...@jamielinux.com
Bugzill
On 16 May 2012 20:09, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 06:10:08PM +0100, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> On 16 May 2012 08:16, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>> > Also, implementing socket-activation in nginx would make it upgradable
>> > without losing any connections.
>
On 16 May 2012 08:16, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:19:20AM +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>> On 05/16/2012 12:21 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> > /etc/init.d/nginx upgrade
>> >
>> >This has disappeared following migration to systemd, so my
On 16 May 2012 00:19, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 05/16/2012 12:21 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>>
>> /etc/init.d/nginx upgrade
>>
>> This has disappeared following migration to systemd, so my intention
>> is to include an nginx-upgrade shell script to replac
Hi,
Currently trying to sort out:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821926
Following an update to the nginx package, the command below would
allow the server to switch to the new binary with zero-downtime (new
process created, old process gracefully phased out):
/etc/init.d/nginx up
Neal Becker wrote:
> What do I need
> to do to update my copy to include f17 branch?
Just do "fedpkg switch-branch f17" and the branch will automagically appear :-)
Jamie
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Ken Dreyer wrote:
> 2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý :
>> But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS
>> account.
>> How do you do this check?
>
> I use zodbot's fasinfo command, because it's faster than searching the
> FAS web interface.
>
>> Therefore I suggest to enhance t
Johannes Lips wrote:
> Isn't it easiest to just ask for the FAS name of the person who wants to
> become a packager? I don't really see how this should be less efficient than
> searching the mail address in the FAS database.
Yes. Since the emails don't necessarily match up, I don't think you
can r
Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
>> Thomas Spura wrote:
>>> 2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý :
>>>> But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS
>>>> account.
>>>> How do you do
Thomas Spura wrote:
> 2012/2/23 Miroslav Suchý :
>> But I find incredibly hard to find relation between bugzilla email and FAS
>> account.
>> How do you do this check?
>
> Show all useres in the cla_signed group [3] and search for the mail
> address. When it's not there it may be overritten in [4].
Hello,
My name is Jamie Nguyen. I'm a student in the UK and part-time Linux
system administrator.
I am an active contributer to the TOMOYO Linux security project [1]
and provide a binary repository containing RPMS/SRPMS for TOMOYO Linux
kernels for Enterprise Linux 6 and Fedora 16 [2]. I
74 matches
Mail list logo
