package installation statistics

2011-06-03 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
Hello, do Fedora have some statistics of how many users install concrete fedora package? Ivana Hutarova Varekova -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: mandb behavior

2011-02-15 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
t. File a bug report in bugzilla please. > > Rahul Hello, you are right, thanks for the bug report. Ivana Hutarova Varekova -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: mpfr soname bump in rawhide

2010-12-01 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
On 11/30/2010 07:57 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 18:03 +0100, Ivana Varekova wrote: >> Hello, >> >> mpfr-3.0.0 is now build to rawhide branch and soname is bumped to 4.0.0 >> there. >> MPFR 3.0.0 is binary incompatible with previous versions and also is not >> completely API c

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-05-05 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
in fc14. man-db is fedora from 14 so there is no 13 version. The man in 13 provides the tag just for the purpose to fix possible problem if the maintainer of packages uses this flag in fc13 too, it have not any other reason there now. Ivana Hutarova Varekova -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-10 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
On 03/08/2010 02:59 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/08/2010 11:25 AM, Ivana Hutarova Varekova wrote: > >>For now in fedora there are 11 packages which contains language >> mutations of man-pages (man-pages-{cs,da,de,es,fr,it,ja,ko,pl,ru,uk}) >> and man-pages p

should man-pages-* have Requires: man?

2010-03-08 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
* packages. From my point of view man dependency should be in all of them. Any ideas? Ivana Hutarova Varekova -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: switching from man to man-db

2010-02-24 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
bsoletes/Provides is the best solution. > > Kevin Kofler > > Yes I agree, the idea is to add obsolete/provides. Man-db have the a lot of functionality which is the same with man, so theer are a lot of conflicts and if the package will replace man, the it has no sense to rename or re

Re: man-db vs. man

2010-02-24 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
Hello, sorry for the late response, I'm the man package maintainer and I agree with the idea to switch from man to man-db. I just sent a mail to fedora list about it. Thanks. Ivana On 02/12/2010 05:53 PM, Till Maas wrote: > Hiyas, > according to the man-db[0] homepage all/most other major distri

switching from man to man-db

2010-02-24 Thread Ivana Hutarova Varekova
Hello, I'd like to switch from man (http://primates.ximian.com/~flucifredi/man/) to man-db project (http://man-db.nongnu.org/). man-db seems for me to be better choice then the original man. The reasons are: * the upstream very active in man-db, man upstream almost does not response and the las