Re: F35 Change: Disable SHA1 In OpenDNSSec (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Hi Paul, all, On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 1:40 AM Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2021, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Change/DisableSHA1InOpenDNSSec > > > == Detailed Description == > > > > OpenDNSSec changed the default behavior to not include SHA1 DS by > > default,

Re: Does anyone know how to contact Ryan Rix (rrix)?

Hi Ryan, Thanks for your contributions during all these years. I've taken over python-netifaces. Feel free to handover cowsay-beefymiracle to me if you like. My FAS is fcami. Cheers François On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:25 PM Ryan Rix wrote: > > Thanks Kevin, > > I've orphaned python-netifaces

Does anyone know how to contact Ryan Rix (rrix)?

Hi, This is the official unresponsive maintainer check for rrix. Associated bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1968568 Ryan's last build was nearly 7 years ago: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=1124 Neglected bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1878064

Does anyone know how to contact Greg Swift (xaeth)?

Hi, This is the official unresponsive maintainer check for xaeth. Associated bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949831 Greg's last build was 7 years ago: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=1887 Neglected bz: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495323 Greg

Re: doxbox-staging package conflict

On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:36 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:34 PM Otto Urpelainen wrote: > > > > Hans de Goede kirjoitti 1.6.2021 klo 21.02: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 6/1/21 6:20 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > >> Hello all. > > >> > > >> doxbox-staging is trying to over

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (~200 nodejs packages to be retired in 2 days)

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 3:15 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 22. 06. 20 15:02, François Cami wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:38 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> > >> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > >>

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (~200 nodejs packages to be retired in 2 days)

Hi, On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 2:38 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedor

Re: unresponsive maintainer: itamarjp

Hi, On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:50 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hi, François. > > On Sunday, 29 March 2020 at 14:59, François Cami wrote: > > Hi Itamar, > > > > I am starting the unresponsive maintainer process [0], because > > pac

unresponsive maintainer: itamarjp

Hi Itamar, I am starting the unresponsive maintainer process [0], because packages you maintain or co-maintain are FTBFS [1]. Your last build action in koji dates from early December 2019 [2]. Unfortunately, a lot of your packages are scheduled to be orphaned [3] soon. I will follow the unresponsi

Re: Policy for non-responsive reviewers

On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 5:15 PM Jerry James wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade > wrote: > > Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but > > I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package > > review process [2] which me

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (incl. wine, dosbox, nextcloud, owncloud)

-- > in your fear, seek only peace > in your fear, seek only love > -d. bowie > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 3:28 PM, François Cami > wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 8:48 PM Gw

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (incl. wine, dosbox, nextcloud, owncloud)

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 8:48 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > > I'll take openal-soft, pdfbox, freealut, python-httplib2, and dosbox. FAS:limb Heh, I wanted to take openal-soft and dosbox as I've been the de-facto maintainer for some time. FAS: fcami https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8972 Gwyn, wha

Re: Orphaned packages that will be retired (and everything will most likely burn)

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 5:03 PM Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > > On to, 28 helmi 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 06:11, Ingo Hoffmann wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> First time here and concerned Java citizen. Who or how can I contact > >> regarding the maven package maint

Re: Orphaned packages that will be retired

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 9:51 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > https://fedoraproj

taking over some of fale's packages

Hi, As fale has orphaned packages ( https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TTRKFTADCEHAJSZ55YXIPT3DOZY5RTYW/ ) I would like to take over rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf and some of its dependencies. I've opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7855 Please let me

Re: Fedora 27 kernel updates make system unbootable (sort of)

> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 3:32 PM, Lennart Poettering > > OK after a bunch of additional testing, one thing is certain; grubby > and grub-mkconfig are not even remotely crash safe. They do not > fsync() or sync() at all. That's not good no matter the file system. May I point you to https://githu

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump in tinyxml2

> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Matthew Miller > > Isn't it also moderated? Which would mean the moderator has to be > paying attention and let it through... > > I like devel +maintainers directly. We seem to have reached consensus in that either devel or devel-announce should be used so

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump in tinyxml2

> announcement should be made here too + > Rule of thumb: more communication is better. Ack. Change proposal for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Rawhide_.2F_devel_.2F_master "A week in advance, notify maintainers who depend on their package to rebuild when there are abi/api chan

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump in tinyxml2

> announcement should be made here too Okay, so I'm officially confused. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Rawhide_.2F_devel_.2F_master says: "For updates to rawhide packages, Maintainers SHOULD: (...) A week in advance, notify maintainers who depend on their package to rebuild when

Re: Unannounced SONAME bump in tinyxml2

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tinyxml2/c/3600750a8f1b0eaa6cab346496fd75a07 > ea749cb This was announced to all package owners depending on tinyxml2 right after the build succeed on f

Re: orphaning all my packages

Hi, I've ack'ed all the requests and orphaned the rest of my packages. Please note that this is due to a chronic lack of free time and has nothing to do with Fedora itself. You are a wonderful community :) All the best, François On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:36 PM, François Cami wrot

Re: orphaning all my packages

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > I would like to take enet. It's all yours. > - Original Message - >> From: "François Cami" >> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" >> >> Cc: "Kevin F

Re: orphaning all my packages

Hi Raphael, On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Raphael Groner wrote: > Hi François, > > I'm interested in some of the mentioned packages and requested in PkgDB: > > - bats > - unittest-cpp Thanks! They're all yours. I'm just a co-maintainers of the others (below) so they won't be going away. >

Re: osgaudio packaging (bundles/provides openalpp)

Hi Dominik, On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi, François. > Sorry for late reply. > > On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 00:43, François Cami wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to package osgaudio, which is an OpenSc

orphaning all my packages

Hello, I'll orphan all my packages at 2PM UTC+2 tomorrow. rpms/bats -- Bash Automated Testing System ( master f24 f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) rpms/djview4 -- DjVu viewer ( epel7 ) rpms/djvulibre -- DjVu viewers, encoders, and utilities ( master f24 f23 f22 epel7 el6 ) rpms/enet -- Thin, simple and robust

osgaudio packaging (bundles/provides openalpp)

Hi, I'd like to package osgaudio, which is an OpenSceneGraph-like frontend to OpenAL. It is currently maintained by OpenSceneGraph's main author at: https://github.com/robertosfield/osgaudio/ It requires and contains openalpp, a C++ frontend for OpenAL. We haven't shipped openalpp since Fedora 7.

gcc6 / arm rebuild issue

Hi, openal-soft fails to build on arm / f24, probably due to a toolchain change: " /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnueabi/6.0.0/include/arm_neon.h:9013:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 'vld1q_f32': target specific option mismatch " The complete build log is located at: https:

Re: unresponsive maintainer: landgraf

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Pavel Zhukov wrote: > First of all at the moment I'm sick. Ok. Get well first. > I have more urgent bugs/packages to update and will check mupdf once I have > time. Much appreciated. > And Patches are welcome! The reporter of bz #1122539 has apparently bui

unresponsive maintainer: landgraf

Greetings, I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer policy for Pavel Zhukov (landgraf), as mupdf hasn't been updated in a while: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148319 which leads to interesting bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122539 and blocks the zathura-pdf-mupdf

orphaning a few packages

Hello, I'm orphaning a few packages as I do not use them anymore. * scons * jed * greylistd * and the zathura stack: girara, zathura, zathura-cb, zathura-djvu, zathura-pdf-poppler, zathura-ps (maintained by contyk) Regards, François -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://adm

Re: nonresponsive maintainer - Axel Thimm

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > I'm continuing the nonresponsive maintainer process for Axel Thimm > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186467 +1 > I've been effectively maintaining a number of Axel's packages for years now. > Time to get them properly owned.

Re: GUI applications writing garbage to stdout/stderr

Hello, On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Marcel Oliver wrote: > > Many GUI applications write garbage to either stdout or stderr, making > the terminal windows difficult to view and navigate. (...) > Some of the main culprints for me are nemo, evince, and okular; if I > am go looking, I can proba

ocl-icd: update to 2.2.3 in a week

Hi, I'll update ocl-icd to the latest release (2.2.3) in a week. Dependencies: LuxRender, clinfo, clpeak, pocl, mesa. Updated SPEC and SRPM available at: https://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/ocl-icd.spec https://fcami.fedorapeople.org/srpms/ocl-icd-2.2.3-1.git20141005.7cd0c2f.fc21.src.rpm Scrat

djvulibre/epel6 is no longer an orphan

Hi, I've taken over djvulibre/epel6 to avoid retiring the package. Co-maintainers are welcome. François -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Exception procedure: nonresponsive package maintainer

Hello, I 'd like an up-to-date disper build for EPEL6 and EPEL7. There are no EPEL branches for disper and the package is outdated (by ~18 months) in rawhide. I've opened a bug mentioning I can help maintaining the package with an updated srpm: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1143055

Re: Nonresponsive maintainers: Takanori Matsuura

Hello, On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote: > According to Policy for nonresponsive package maintainers. > > Takanori Matsuura did not respond on > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105916, contact email is silent > too. > Moreover, his last build on koji was

tinyxml2 API/ABI change

Hello, I will update tinyxml2 in a week in rawhide. cppcheck, dvblinkremote and libmediainfo will need to be rebuilt afterwards. As far as I can tell no change will be needed to rebuild at least the last two. A scratch build is available at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=68598

Re: Take over Seth packages

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I've orphaned the following: > > pyliblzma - all branched (fcami is going to take this) Taken, thank you Kevin. François -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code o

Re: Take over Seth packages

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 08/30/2013 12:19 PM, François Cami wrote: >> >> I'll be waiting for at least one +1 from a FESCo member. > > Do not wait here. > File FESCo ticket: > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/newticket Done. https

Re: Take over Seth packages

Hi, On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > pyliblzma -- Python bindings for lzma > yum-utils -- Utilities based around the yum package manager If no one objects I'd like to take yum-utils and pyliblzma over. I'll be waiting for at least one +1 from a FESCo member. François

orphaning ntop

Hello, I've orphaned ntop in pkdg. Cheers -- François -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

orphaning licq

Hello, I've orphaned licq in pkdg as I do not use it anymore. Cheers -- François -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

enet soname change

Hi, I am going to switch enet.spec from using a version-generated soname to upstream's soname, so libenet-1.3.3.so will become libenet.so.2 (based on 1.3.8) in rawhide only. Packages depending on enet will (obviously) need a rebuild. Best regards, François -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedor

orphaning cal3d, freeimage, libosip2, linphone, opencv, osgal

Hello, I'm orphaning some packages: cal3d -- Skeletal based 3-D character animation library freeimage -- Multi-format image decoder library libosip2 -- oSIP is an implementation of SIP linphone -- Phone anywhere in the whole world by using the Internet opencv -- Collection of algorithms for compu

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

Hello, On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > = Features/ApacheOpenOffice = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApacheOpenOffice > > Feature owner(s): Andrea Pescetti > > Add Apache OpenOffice, the free productivity suite, to Fedora. > > == Detailed description == > Apac

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > On 29 January 2013 15:51, François Cami wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >>>>>> enet -- Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP >>>>> >>>>>

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: enet -- Thin, simple and robust network layer on top of UDP >>> >>> http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/enet >>> There have been a few upstream releases. >>> There are three co-maintainers for this already. >> >> @enet co-maintainers >> >> Any

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > On 29 January 2013 11:27, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote: >> >>> freeimage -- Multi-format image decoder library >> >> This one is a mystery: >> >> 2009-05-21 (!) https://bugzilla.redhat.co

Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

Hello, On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: I'll take these if not accounted for already: > djvulibre -- DjVu viewers, encoders, and utilities > jed -- Fast, compact editor based on the S-Lang screen library > libogg -- The Ogg bitstream file format library > libosip2 -- oSIP i

Re: End of life in bugzilla, how to reopen?

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 20:48 +0100, François Cami wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Andreas Tunek >> wrote: >> > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 22:26 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >> >> 4 as well (not F1

Re: End of life in bugzilla, how to reopen?

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 22:26 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >> 4 as well (not F13), but I can not change the version. >> > Do I have to file a new bug? >> >> I have reopened i > > So what kind of special access do you have to have to bugzilla

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 18:20 +0100, François Cami wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:20 +0100, François Cami wrote: >> > >> >> Of course, we

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-12-02 at 13:20 +0100, François Cami wrote: > >> Of course, we could look at things differently: for a package to be >> marked critpath, it should have users or be a dependency of some other >> package

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 14:17 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> When software is packaged it's reasonable to expect that someone, >> somewhere, uses it; if they don't, it probably shouldn't be packaged. We >> need to find those people and eng

Re: old_testing_critpath notifications

On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Luke Macken wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:36:18PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On 2010-11-29, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: >> > >> > Proven testers do get copies of these emails (dozens of them) and its >> > a

Re: orphaning licq

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > On 11/27/2010 12:15 AM, François Cami wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Jiri Moskovcak >>  wrote: >>> >>> I'm no longer interested in this package, so I'm going to orphan in it

Re: gnome-guitar in f14?

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, lakshminaras2...@gmail.com wrote: > There is no gnome-guitar package in f14. Previous releases do have it. Any > reasons why it has not been rebuilt for f14? Because it was orphaned and no one picked it up. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-Aug

Re: orphaning licq

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > I'm no longer interested in this package, so I'm going to orphan in it. > IMHO there is not much users anyway, so how about removing it entirely? I'd like to take it if you orphan it, if you don't mind. François -- devel mailing list deve

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17)

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: >> I don't disagree with anything you say, but the question of what's more >> important than testing an update is key. If an update's worth doing, >> it's worth testing. This is pretty simple, and amply demonstrated by >

Re: Updates Criteria Summary/Brainstorming

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > ok, I dug through the devel list for the last month or two and wrote > down all the various ideas folks have come up with to change/improve > things. > > Here (in no particular order) are the ideas and some notes from me on > how we could enab

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17)

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 11:23 +0100, Till Maas wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:18:38PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> > place. The idea was never that some magic independent group of testers >> > would spend the rest of their lives

Re: more updates discussion

On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:38:38 +0100 > François Cami wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Kevin Kofler >> wrote: >> > Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> So, there are no folks in the KDE sig using

Re: Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-11-17)

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> So, there are no folks in the KDE sig using F13 anymore? >> >> Perhaps call for testers in the users / kde lists? > > I think this issue goes far, far beyond just KDE. There are packages which > have few users even for F

Re: Fixing the glibc adobe flash incompatibility

On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Magnus Glantz wrote: > On 11/17/2010 09:09 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Bruno Wolff III  wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 08:57:20 +0100, >>>   Hans de Goede  wrote: For those who do not know it yet, recent Fedora glibc upda

Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 14:54:28 -0500 > Simo Sorce wrote: > >> Adam why should security updates wait at all ? >> Do you fear some packager will flag as security updates that are not ? >> Surely we can deal with such maintainer if that happens...

Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:15:03PM +, Joel wrote: >> > Michel Alexandre Salim fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> >> We might need a mass-orphaning if Gérard cannot >> >> continue his Fedora work anymore. >> >> Paul Howarth city-fan.org>

Re: Orphaned package: system-config-display

On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:32 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: >> Kevin Kofler wrote: >> > 3. What if you can't bring up X in the first place? (You can't run gnome- >> > display-properties if you can't get into X. system-config-display >> >

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 08/12/2010 03:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Mike McGrath wrote: >>> Luckily Remi got a list: >>> >>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/140708.html >> >> Unfortunately, Remi's list only covers php-*, I think there