Last week NSS 3.25 was released and it's now on Rawhide and it's now
slowly making it's to fedora stable branches.
The upstream release notes are at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.25_release_notes.
Though it's a minor release it's one with many changes that
Upstream released nmss-3.20 and the NSS family of packages on Rawhide has been
rebased to it.
For details please see the upstream release notes at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.20_release_notes
It should start showing up in updates-testing for stable branch
On 03/19/2015 02:54 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 17:41 -0400, Elio Maldonado wrote:
nss-3.18 was released. Please see the upstream release notes at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.18_release_notes
Rawhide is now updated and it should
nss-3.18 was released. Please see the upstream release notes at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.18_release_notes
Rawhide is now updated and it should start showing up on updates-testing for
F-22 and stable branches next week.
Elio
--
devel mailing list
de
On 02/09/2015 08:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 02/09/2015 03:43 PM, Elio Maldonado wrote:
Support for ssl2 will be disabled in NSS. Refer to the to the Mozilla page with
a list of sites [1] and the fedora bug [2] filed to disable SSL2 at build time.
Upstream NSS will disable SSL2 perhaps
To all concerned,
Support for ssl2 will be disabled in NSS. Refer to the to the Mozilla page with
a list of sites [1] and the fedora bug [2] filed to disable SSL2 at build time.
Upstream NSS will disable SSL2 perhaps as early as September of this year. Red
Hat has had SSL2 disabled at built tim
The upstream release notes for nss-3.17.3 at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.17.3_release_notes
Building now for Rawhide and it will make its way to updates-testing for stable
branches next week.
-Elio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
For more details please see the upstream release notes at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.16.1_release_notes
-Elio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedorap
nss 3.16 was released this week and is now on Rawhide. Details in the
upstream release notes at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSS/NSS_3.16_release_notes.
It should appear on updated testing for fedora stable branches next week.
Elio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
On 10/18/2013 06:54 PM, Elio Maldonado Batiz wrote:
On 10/18/2013 12:55 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Eric H. Christensen
wrote:
Information on this fix is in Bugzilla[1].
There are >80 packages affected, would it be possible to give the
owners a shorter (
On 10/18/2013 12:55 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 10:33 PM, Eric H. Christensen
wrote:
Information on this fix is in Bugzilla[1].
There are >80 packages affected, would it be possible to give the
owners a shorter (and authoritative[1]) version, instead of asking
each mainta
On 10/16/2013 08:54 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 19:08 -0700, Elio Maldonado Batiz wrote:
Oops, I pasted too much is hard to read. The diff lines that matter
are
# This patch is currently meant for stable branches
-# Patch29: nss-ssl-cbc-random-iv-off-by-default.patch
variable
NSS_SSL_CBC_RANDOM_IV=0.
...
-Elio
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Elio Maldonado wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Eric H. Christensen"
> To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:33:06 PM
> Subj
tial when mixing and matching
%patch25 -p0 -b .systemfreebl
# activate for stable and beta branches
-# %%patch29 -p0 -b .cbcrandomivoff
+%patch29 -p0 -b .cbcrandomivoff
# %%patch39 -p0 -b .nobypass
%patch40 -p0 -b .noocsptest
%patch44 -p1 -b .syncupwithupstream
@@ -758,6 +758,7 @@
* Thu Sep 26
NSS 3.15.2was released this week. This is mostly a patch
updatecontaining one security fix for CVE-2013-1739.
For more details please the release notes at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSS/NSS_3.15.2_release_notes
The Rawhide update hopefully will should show up by the end of the d
It is my fault because I forgot to manually expire everything in the buildroot
once my last build was done.
-Elio
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Williamson"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:51:34 PM
Subject: Re: f18 koji all failed
On
On 06/27/2013 08:12 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
Hi Martin,
Definitely not a rpm bug. rpm's version comparison semantics are well
defined and 4.10.0 is strictly higher than 4.10.
Martin, Kai, and I have discussed itand have proposal consistent with yours.
I would say one of the 3 things should hap
Hi all,
This is a patch release primarily to address CVE-2013-1620
For details please see the upstream release notes are at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSS/NSS_3.14.3_release_notes
Cheers,
Elio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
On 02/06/2013 11:48 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:01:33 -0800, Elio Maldonado wrote:
The problem is that there are four packages, nspr, nss-util,
nss-softokn, nss, and nspr expired sooner that the others as sometines
nss takes me longer. we have two options: (1) expire all
On 02/06/2013 11:01 AM, Elio Maldonado wrote:
On 02/06/2013 01:21 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 06:55:13 +0100, Johannes Lips wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to build stuff for fedora 17 and it failed due to
dependency problems:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2017
On 02/06/2013 01:21 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 06:55:13 +0100, Johannes Lips wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to build stuff for fedora 17 and it failed due to
dependency problems:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2017/4932017/root.log
What's happening and why is this
To all interested,
This is the upstream announcement:
[NOTE: NSS 3.14.2 does not include a fix for the attacks described
in
the paper "Lucky Thirteen: Breaking the TLS and DTLS Record
Protocols"
(http://www.isg.rhul.ac.uk/tls/).
An upcoming NSS
Hi all,
Please see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895144 and
also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=893736
I almost sure of what's the cause. Currently testing the proposed fix.
Elio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
Updated nss and nspr in Rawhide to nss-3.14 and 4.9.4, respectively. This is a
minor patch release. The release notes are at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSS/NSS_3.14.1_release_notes
Elio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
On 11/23/2012 03:49 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:42:57 -0500
Neal Becker wrote:
Any ideas on this?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=4722671&name=mock_output.log&offset=-4000
The nss maintainer added a buildroot override thats causing that.
"emaldonado has ad
On 11/03/2012 08:27 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:41:05 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:29:07 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Hans and I have been having a problem uploading the source for the
new version of hegdewars to the lookaside cache. T
On 10/25/2012 12:37 PM, Nalin Dahyabhai wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 12:49:59PM -0400, Elio Maldonado wrote:
The release notes are at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSS/NSS_3.14_release_notes
Those release notes say that the license is now MPL 2.0.
If I'm reading
The release notes are at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/NSS/NSS_3.14_release_notes
Elio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I have updated nss in Rawhide to the upstream tag NSS_3_13_4_BETA1.
The list of bugs fixed on 3.12.4 can be found at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741135
Please see on this list to if there is anything of concern to products you use
or maintain.
Some highlists:
The primary dri
SSL_CBC_RANDOM_IV SSL option to PR_TRUE and try it and send us feedback on
remaining sites or apps that syill break?
Thank you in advance,
Elio Maldonado
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 01/11/2012 07:40 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:45:05 +0100
Michael J Gruber wrote:
Infrastructure ticket anyone?
Well, rel-eng. ;) https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5023 This issue was
due to a nss-util buildroot override expiring.
I've re-enabled the override for
On 12/20/2011 07:10 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
>
>> fedora 16 koji broken
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3596971
>>
>>
>> DEBUG util.py:307: Executing command: ['/usr/bin/yum',
>> '--installroot', '/var/lib/mock/f16-build-1203861-192685/root/',
>>
On 11/02/2011 11:32 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2011, at 11:20 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> I would appreciate even a quick patch as without fedpkg is unusable to
>> me (and I guess I'm not the only one whose login != fas username).
> There is a global fedpkg option to define your user
pes of records, because some implementations will not accept
fragmented records of some other types (e.g. some versions of NSS do not
accept fragmented alerts).
--
The NSS team would greatly appreciate any feedback, specially regarding
compatiblity issues with various sites.
Thank
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nspr-4.8.8-1.fc14,nss-util-3.12.10-1.fc14,nss-softokn-3.12.10-1.fc14,nss-3.12.10-1.fc14
Thanks in advance
Elio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
See:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.10-1.fc15,nss-softokn-3.12.10-1.fc15,nss-util-3.12.10-1.fc15,nspr-4.8.8-1.fc15
For the lists of upstream bug fixes see:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?order=Importance&resolution=FIXED&classification=Components&query_format=advanced&
NSS 3.12.10 is coming out soon from upstream. I have updated NSPR and NSS in
Rawhide to NSPR_4_8_8_BETA3 and NSS_3_12_10_BETA1, respectively. Any feedback
on these would be greately appreciated.
Thank you,
Elio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
On 03/11/2011 12:18 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Ralf Ertzinger said:
this document is about a quite special case (regarding lawfully binding
digital signatures) and not about SSL in general.
I took a short look at software support for other SSL hashes:
- OpenSSL: openssl only off
It's in need of feedback and karmic points (specially from proven testers)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.9-8.fc13,nss-softokn-3.12.9-5.fc13,nss-util-3.12.9-1.fc13,nspr-4.8.7-1.fc13
The corresponding ones for f14 are already on stable.
Thanks in advance,
Elio
smime.p7s
Desc
A multi-package update is now available on f14 updates-testing. Please see
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-util-3.12.9-1.fc14,nss-softokn-3.12.9-1.fc14,nss-3.12.9-1.fc14,nspr-4.8.7-1.fc14
Your feedback is appreciated, in particular from proventesters.
Thanks,
Elio
--
devel mailing
Please see
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-util-3.12.9-1.fc14,nss-softokn-3.12.9-1.fc14,nss-3.12.9-1.fc14,nspr-4.8.7-1.fc14
Feedback appreciated, specially from proventesters.
Thanks,
Elio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
On 10/11/2010 12:31 AM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>On 10/10/10 12:25 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> On 10/9/10 2:54 PM, fkoo...@tuxed.net wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Philip Prindeville
>>> wrote:
Any suggestions?
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicks
On 09/12/2010 12:50 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> How did this slip through the cracks? Isn't that a security related
> update?
>
No, it didn't slip trough the cracks. Some problems with the nss 3.12.7
update on which it depends have held up the release for f13 and f12.
Elio
--
devel mailing
On 09/07/2010 05:33 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 09/07/2010 12:52 PM, Elio Maldonado wrote:
>
>>>
>> Gene,
>>
>> There is in now nss-3.12.7-4.fc13 in bodhi.
>> Regarding
>>
>> error: Failed dependencies:
>> pkgconfig(nss) is need
On 09/06/2010 10:39 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 09/06/2010 01:14 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 09/06/2010 05:22 AM, mike cloaked wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:59 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
There is a build in koji for 3.12.7 for f13 (and f14):
http://koji
On 09/05/2010 01:28 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> Randall Berry wrote, at 09/05/2010 05:06 PM +9:00:
>>I tried building a package on Koji against rawhide and got an error
>> before the build even began.[1] I tried to build the same package
>> locally with mock and it built just fine. Is there a
On 06/02/2010 12:51 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Robert Relyea (rrel...@redhat.com) said:
>>> It's due to the fact that nss-softokn-freebl (actually, *all* the nss/nspr
>>> libraires) do not fit the normal library naming, so it's not explicitly
>>> pulled for
>>> multilib. For any update or releas
c file, libfreebl.so.3 as an alias to
libfreebl3.so (and similarly with libnssdmb3.so and linsoftoken3.so), would
that help?
Elio
- Original Message -
From: "Elio Maldonado"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
, "Robert Relyea" , "Kai
Engert&quo
1 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues
Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said:
> Not sure but I strongly suspect a change made to nss.spec to be the cause.
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596840#c7
It's due to the fa
Not sure but I strongly suspect a change made to nss.spec to be the cause.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596840#c7
Elio
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Underwood"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2010 1:48:38 AM GMT -08:0
- Original Message -
From: "Toshio Kuratomi"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:27:02 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: nss version went backwards ?
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:25:23AM -0800, Elio Maldona
On 01/12/2010 10:42 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> My f12 + updates + updates-testing box is unhappy with the current state of
> the repo.
> Yum complains..
>
> Transaction Check Error:
>package nss-3.12.5-2.fc12.x86_64 (which is newer than
> nss-3.12.4-14.fc12.i686) is already installed
>
> What ha
52 matches
Mail list logo
