On 14:12 Thu 22 Dec , Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 12/21/2011 06:52 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > On 12/21/2011 05:09 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> >> On 20.12.2011 19:30, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> >>> Probably because OpenJDK and SunJDK aren't really that compatible.
> >
> > Well, hold on.
On 10:41 Thu 22 Dec , Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:17:15 +
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> > On 12/21/2011 10:45 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > > On 21.12.2011 18:52, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > >> There really is very little difference between the com.sun.*
> > >> classes in OpenJDK and
On 18:09 Wed 21 Dec , Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 20.12.2011 19:30, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> > Probably because OpenJDK and SunJDK aren't really that compatible.
>
> I am afraid that most of these problems are caused by stupid developers
> who are using (against all advices they were given)
On 06:54 Sun 18 Dec , Neal Becker wrote:
> http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=159737
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Saw this on LWN. It's because of Oracle licensing changes and
may actually
On 13:12 Fri 04 Nov , Tom Lane wrote:
> I have been looking into replacing Fedora's obsolete version of libpng
> (1.2.x release series) with something more modern. The possible choices
> are the 1.4.x and 1.5.x release series. The 1.5.x series adds some more
> features that 1.4.x did not have
On 16:48 Mon 31 Oct , Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> > Am 31.10.2011 17:00, schrieb Deepak Bhole:
> >
> >> It looks like a known bug in the 6 compiler related to interface
> >> inheritance and covariant return types. I think this is the commit
> >> that fixed it in 7:
> >>
> >> http://hg.openjdk.j
On 19:58 Wed 26 Oct , Heiko Adams wrote:
> Am 26.10.2011 19:06, schrieb Jared K. Smith:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Heiko Adams
> > wrote:
> >> is it just me or is java-1.7.0-openjdk breaking LibreOffice java
> >> detection?
> >
> > Sounds like it might be related to bug 748585.
>
On 14:50 Thu 01 Sep , Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 20:42 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > It seems one always forgets something... well, better this than leaving
> > the stove on.
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:45 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> > > Here's the gist (in no parti
On 10:55 Fri 29 Jul , Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Omair Majid [2011-07-29 10:32]:
> > On 07/25/2011 04:04 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > >* Bill Nottingham [2011-07-25 15:54]:
> > >>Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> > >>>Robyn and I have talked about how the feature process could be adapt
On 19:06 Thu 04 Nov , Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 11/04/2010 06:56 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> > On 17:54 Thu 04 Nov , Frank Murphy wrote:
> >> On 04/11/10 17:51, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> This is the problem we hav
On 17:54 Thu 04 Nov , Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 04/11/10 17:51, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
>
> > This is the problem we have with java-1.6.0-openjdk, except it's magnified
> > by the fact that the user could be running *ANYTHING* on the JVM. So if
>
On 07:41 Thu 04 Nov , Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> snip...
>
> As a maintainer, abrt to me primarily means "wading through wakes of
> hardly readable emails", mostly to scan them for useful information. I
> many cases I ended up with closing BZ, because these emails did not
> contain sufficient
On 12:53 Sun 17 Oct , Eric Smith wrote:
> Has anyone worked on packaging Java3D for Fedora? Or is there any
> reason that it wouldn't be acceptable for inclusion in Fedora?
>
> I haven't really looked into packaging Java3D yet, but I want to package
> ReplicatorG, which is used to control
13 matches
Mail list logo
