Re: Mid-August expiration of some H264 patents

On Friday, 01 August 2025 at 20:23, Mateus Rodrigues Costa wrote: > As you might know the H264 situation isn't very good under Linux due > to patents. We are fully aware of the situation and I think this is not the appropriate place to discuss patents. Rest assured that the Multimedia SIG is read

miniz SONAME bump

Hi, I've become a co-maintainer of miniz recently, because it's a dependency of one of my other packages and the (previously sole) maintainer was in a much similar position. My interest in the package was to fix it to provide pkgconfig file for easy detection. It turned out that it's provided by u

openapv SONAME bump in Rawhide

Hi, I'm updating openapv to 0.2.0.0 release in Rawhide only (at this time). There don't seem to be any consumers, so no packages need a rebuild. This release brings in only new APIs, so if anyone is using it outside Fedora, a simple rebuild should suffice. Upstream release notes: https://github.co

Re: Windows Secure Boot certificate expiration (June 2026)

On Wednesday, 09 July 2025 at 14:38, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Your problem is: > https://github.com/fwupd/fwupd/wiki/LVFS-Triaged-Issue:-dbx-efivarfs-IO-error Thanks. I went into firmware setup and reset the SecureBoot keys and now the update is not showing as available at all. I'm not sure I un

Re: Windows Secure Boot certificate expiration (June 2026)

On Wednesday, 09 July 2025 at 14:06, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9 2025 at 11:28:19 AM +02:00:00, Gerd Hoffmann > wrote: > > Problem with that is not so much linux, but that a KEK update has never > > happened before so there are chances that bios vendors messed up things > > and updati

Re: Datacenter move update - 2025-07-03 01:00UTC

On Wednesday, 09 July 2025 at 12:01, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 09. 07. 25 v 11:49 Michal Schorm napsal(a): > > Thoughts with disclaimer - I have zero technical experience in this area. > > > > As I see it, the problem is: > > - we have a service(s) running on good will, volunteer work and > > do

gitg license update

License tag for gitg has been updated from GPL-2.0-or-later to GPL-2.0-or-later AND GPL-3.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.0-or-later AND MIT Additional licenses were found after code review. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logi

Re: F43 Change Proposal: Drop i686 support (system wide)

On Wednesday, 25 June 2025 at 16:19, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > With Wine solved, it sounds like Steam is the only remaining concern. It is not. There are tons of Linux-native games, e.g. from GOG (gog.com) that people like myself have purchased and want to play. Many of them were built as 32-b

Re: Preview of declarative Maven builds available in rawhide

Hi! On Friday, 13 June 2025 at 18:21, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > I'm excited to announce the preview availability of declarative Maven > RPM builds in Fedora 43 -- a new approach to RPM packaging for > Maven-based Java projects [...] > This feature is currently in preview. So far, a single package

Re: Remove openh264?

On Tuesday, 10 June 2025 at 09:22, drago01 wrote: > The whole topic would have been much easier if we didn't decide to remove > hardware de/encoders a few releases ago. > > The number of users needing openh264 would shrink significantly. Unfortunately, hardware based decoding in FFmpeg is tied to

Re: PWG+OpenPrinting annual joint meetup May 2025

Hi, Zdenek! On Monday, 19 May 2025 at 10:43, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > Hi all, > > I attended annual PWG (Printer Working Group) and OpenPrinting meetup which > was held in May virtually via Webex. > > From the things discussed there I would mention the most interesting ones > (more detailed notes

Re: Self Introduction: John Whitington

Hello, John! On Wednesday, 30 April 2025 at 14:12, John Whitington wrote: > Hello everyone, > > (Per > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/ > > > )

Re: GDM dropped support for running X11 sessions in F42 without a Change?

On Friday, 11 April 2025 at 10:01, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: [...] > Yes, that sounds like an accurate description of how things would have gone, > had somebody started the process! But it seems that this window has > closed already, because of the decision to release F42 on Thursday. Reve

Re: Soname bump: libcamera

On Thursday, 10 April 2025 at 17:57, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via devel wrote: > On Thursday, 10 April 2025 at 17:14, Milan Zamazal wrote: > > I created side tag f43-build-side-109750 and built libcamera there > > (without libpisp for now). > > > > Wi

Re: Soname bump: libcamera

On Thursday, 10 April 2025 at 17:14, Milan Zamazal wrote: > I created side tag f43-build-side-109750 and built libcamera there > (without libpisp for now). > > Wim, would you like to rebuild pipewire-plugin-libcamera there when you > have some time? > > libcamera-apps fails to build due to using

GDM dropped support for running X11 sessions in F42 without a Change?

Hello! It has been mentioned in various places [1][2] that GDM has dropped support for running X11 session in F42. However, I cannot find the corresponding Change in the F42 Change list [3]. Has this been done without raising a Change? If yes, I'd argue that it should be reverted and done in F43 w