libasr: RPM package retired

Hello there, To whom it may concern: the package "libasr" has been retired in Fedora. The upstream project declared it as "not maintained anymore" [1], and suggested to use a bundled version. The library has no dependencies in standard repos (except for "opensmtpd"), and will not affect anything.

RPM build: unpackaged file .pyi

Hello there, After bumping upstream version in "python-apsw", I have noticed that a new Python .pyi file was created in the new version, so the package build process started to fail: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/apsw.pyi https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/

Orphaning ustl package

Hello, I'm going to orphan "ustl" package for several reasons: - the library is generally deprecated; - the maintainer has switched the C++ library type to static, which makes shared lib support no longer possible. It should be harmless since there are no packages that depend on "ustl". $ dnf

Re: Rpm: provide a static library in package

On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 6:47 AM Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Denis Fateyev wrote: > > The "ustl" upstream, for which I maintain the RPM package, has recently > > switched from providing a shared library to a static library. &g

Rpm: provide a static library in package

Hello all, The "ustl" upstream, for which I maintain the RPM package, has recently switched from providing a shared library to a static library. So I'm going to make changes in the package, and provide everything in "-devel" subpackage. I have looked through https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/p

Re: GCC changes break "libscrypt" package in F36

Thank you, all variants work fine. Now I have another issue with "nfdump" package, probably for the same reason: a build flag interference. I use '-fPIC' in LDFLAGS to make "configure" happy: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nfdump/blob/rawhide/f/nfdump.spec#_49 I suspect that this flag presen

GCC changes break "libscrypt" package in F36

Hello all, Recently, I have found that with GCC version bump in F36 some of my packages are stopped to build, or stopped to build properly during the planned package rebuild. They were fine under F35 — but apparently there are some changes in newer GCC that affected them. For example, "libscrypt

spdrs60: package review swap

Hello all, I have a new package request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2011964 , which needs to be reviewed. If anyone is interested in a review swap — feel free to take it, and I can review another package in return. Thanks! -- wbr, Denis.

Re: packages seeking new point of contact

Hello there, I've taken python-llfuse (ass requested earlier) and python-apsw. -- wbr, Denis. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Nonresponsive maintainer: maci

Hello there, Does anybody know how to contact Marcel Wysocki ("m...@satgnu.net", FAS login: maci)? While ago, according the policy I've initiated nonresponsive maintainer procedure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304786 , since there is no contact with main contact for Fedora branche

[HEADS UP]: libtommath major version pre-release testing

Greetings, We are preparing a major update for 'libtommath' library [1]. The last stable release happened more than 5 years ago, so there are a lot of changes and improvements over the time. Although there are still some open requests in upstream, the current library state looks pretty stable to

libwhirlpool (a Whirlpool algorithm implementation)

Hello list, A while ago, I've created a Whirlpool hash function library [1] based on the original implementation of Whirlpool algorithm by Vincent Rijmen and Paulo S. L. M. Barreto. It's packaged as 'libwhirlpool' in Fedora and EPEL [2]. Also provides 'whirlpoolsum' utility to calculate and check

File Array-Unique-0.08.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by dfateyev

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Array-Unique: e3fc4333a97c360348b8c7d0b6b94e83 Array-Unique-0.08.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: systeminfo - review package

Hello, BuildRoot is only needed for EPEL5: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag If presents, it should be one of those: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging#BuildRoot_tag Removing BuildRoot and "clean" section are needed only for EPEL5 so I think it would bett

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

Hello all, I haven't thought about possible replacement plans, in my opinion it's too early to talk about that now. As for the packaging process, the package requires some rework and improvement - it's actually in the process. It takes some time and efforts from a submitter (Antonio Trande), we'll