* Adam Williamson [2020-07-24 00:52]:
> On July 23, 2020 6:17:04 p.m. PDT, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* Adam Williamson [2020-07-23 20:57]:
> >> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 12:02 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
[ ... ]
> >
> >I could of-course misunderstanding the issue but
* Adam Williamson [2020-07-23 20:57]:
> On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 12:02 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > (Sending this heads-up in a new thread for better visibility.)
> >
> > Yesterday the f33-java11 side tag was merged into rawhide, which
> > brings the necessary changes to make java-11-openjdk th
* Mikolaj Izdebski [2015-02-24 10:12]:
> On 02/24/2015 04:06 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Mikolaj Izdebski [2015-02-24 09:58]:
> >> On 02/24/2015 03:32 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>> * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24
> >>> 09:29]:
* Mikolaj Izdebski [2015-02-24 09:58]:
> On 02/24/2015 03:32 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24
> > 09:29]:
> >> On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >>> * Dominik 'Rathann' Mi
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24 09:29]:
> On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 15:09, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24
> > 09:04]:
> > > On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> > &
* Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski [2015-02-24 09:04]:
> On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 14:28, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> [...]
> > There were several attempts in past like "can you please support jdk
> > 7,6...in newer fedoras" and we always told no. When come speech about "do it
> > on your own" suddenl
* Andrew Haley [2014-04-07 13:29]:
> On 04/07/2014 03:23 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action.
> >> With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to
> >> address this.
> >>
> >> I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-g
Hi,
There have been a few discussions about this in the past but no action.
With feature freeze approaching for F21, I think this is a good time to
address this.
I will be orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj in Fedora on April 8th. If anyone
wants to take over, please let me know. Please do keep in mind tho
ink that should be an issue; although we
will have to make it so that OpenJDK7 does not provide java/java-devel
so that it no longer gets pulled in by default when building. Is that
OK?
Deepak
> Alexander Kurtakov
> Red Hat Eclipse team
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: &qu
* Christopher [2014-03-25 19:59]:
> I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not
> necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it
> stands, it's difficult to use a modern Fedora on projects that are
> still developing against JDK 1.6.
>
Unfortunately, OpenJ
* Stanislav Ochotnicky [2013-11-19 03:35]:
> Quoting Jerry James (2013-11-18 16:54:28)
> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
> > wrote:
> > > I believe OpenJDK maintainers will agree that automatically detecting if
> > > java or
> > > java-headless is supposed to be required
* Rahul Sundaram [2013-06-17 15:42]:
> Hi
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
>
>
>
> There is no way in hell anyone here is going to fix the security holes
> in Java (open or closed).
>
> The only way to avoid the security holes caused by java is to not use
* Stephen Gallagher [2013-01-23 15:22]:
> On Wed 23 Jan 2013 02:53:30 PM EST, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > = Features/Java8TechPreview =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Java8TechPreview
> >
> > Feature owner(s): Deepak Bhole
> >
> > Add a t
* Jos Vos [2012-08-10 14:08]:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason why the RHEL 6.3 and F17 java-1.7.0-openjdk packages
> provide many items with a different name, i.e. starting with "java7"
> and "java", respectively.
>
> RHEL 6.3 java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.5-2.2.1.el6_3.x86_64.rpm:
>
> java7-1.7.0
* Paul Howarth [2011-12-22 05:41]:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:17:15 +
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>
> > On 12/21/2011 10:45 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > > On 21.12.2011 18:52, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > >> There really is very little difference between the com.sun.*
> > >> classes in OpenJDK and the propr
* Sérgio Basto [2011-11-29 14:39]:
> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 09:02 -0500, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > Java 7 needs to become the default JDK for rawhide. We will start working
> > on this over the coming few days. Until done, Java stuff might be broken
> > here and there.
>
* David Airlie [2011-11-29 05:36]:
> so I was trying to fix xorg-x11-docs, which uses fop which uses java, which
> means I've no idea.
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3549524
>
> The main error is below so I suspect the problem is that some apache/avalon
> framework jar
* Christoph Höger [2011-10-31 11:37]:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am really unsure here, if this is a javac bug, or an eclipse glitch
> or something plain strange. Consider the following interfaces:
>
> public interface A {
> A foo();
> }
>
> public
* Toshio Kuratomi [2011-08-26 11:58]:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:29:33AM -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Haley and I just had a chat about this.
> >
> > We both agree that weaning off the 1.6 dependency is the best long-term
> > solution. We essen
* Deepak Bhole [2011-08-26 10:46]:
> * Andy Grimm [2011-08-26 10:18]:
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > > * Douglas Myers–Turnbull [2011-07-25 20:53]:
> > >> > I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
&g
* Andy Grimm [2011-08-26 10:18]:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Douglas Myers–Turnbull [2011-07-25 20:53]:
> >> > I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
> >> > over the Feature and doing al
* Douglas Myers–Turnbull [2011-07-25 20:53]:
> > I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
> > over the Feature and doing all the work if you're fine with it...
>
> Please do!
>
> The only work I've done (literally) is on the feature page, but feel
> free let me know
* Omair Majid [2011-07-29 10:32]:
> On 07/25/2011 04:04 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> >* Bill Nottingham [2011-07-25 15:54]:
> >>Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> >>>Robyn and I have talked about how the feature process could be adapted to
> >>>
* Marek Goldmann [2011-07-28 10:41]:
>
> On 25 lip 2011, at 17:30, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>
> >>> I created an unfinished, skeletal feature page here:
> >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Java7
> >>> Unfortunately, I don't have the knowle
* Bill Nottingham [2011-07-25 15:54]:
> Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> > Robyn and I have talked about how the feature process could be adapted to
> > allow for more late work to occur however none of that talk has turned into
> > anything solid yet. One point that bears on this is
* Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-25 15:18]:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> > * Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-23 20:03]:
> > > The alpha change deadline is a week and three days away so this is very
> > > likely too late. If you want to try to g
* Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-23 20:03]:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 02:00:24PM -0700, Douglas Myers–Turnbull wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just something I wanted to bring to attention:
> >
> > Java 7 is slated for release (after years of hassle and heated debate)
> > on 28 July, 2011.
> > I think this wou
* Marius Andreiana [2010-12-23 07:01]:
> Hi all,
>
> Please see this bug
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665355
>
> Fedora java distribution cannot read some PNG images which work fine in
> * Windows java 1.6
> * Linux image viewers
> * browsers
> * "identify a.png" works: PNG 16x1
* Andrew Haley [2010-12-23 10:58]:
> On 12/23/2010 03:01 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On 23 December 2010 12:01, Marius Andreiana
> > wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Please see this bug
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665355
> >>
> >> Fedora java distribution cannot read some PNG imag
* Mario Torre [2010-04-21 12:43]:
> Il giorno mer, 21/04/2010 alle 12.17 -0400, Deepak Bhole ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have orphaned the following packages in Fedora. Some of these are
> > core Java packages -- I don't have time to maintain them anymore and
&g
Hi,
I have orphaned the following packages in Fedora. Some of these are
core Java packages -- I don't have time to maintain them anymore and
would rather that someone more active take over:
antlr -- ANother Tool for Language Recognition
cryptix-asn1 -- Cryptix ASN1 implementation
hsqldb -- Hsqldb
31 matches
Mail list logo
