Re: Kernel - default log levels

2020-10-16 Thread David S.
On 16/10/2020 18:57, Sven Kieske wrote: > On Fr, 2020-10-16 at 15:27 +0200, David S. wrote: >> My testing is currently on a standard Fedora 32 x86_64 running in >> Digital Ocean (from their Fedora image pool). It should be fairly >> up-to-date (I see now there is a 5.8.15

Re: Kernel - default log levels

2020-10-16 Thread David S.
On 16/10/2020 01:09, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:24 PM David S. wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I just spotted that there is a difference in the default log levels on >> Fedora and RHEL-8 vs RHEL-7. >> >> Fedora/RHEL-8 uses: >

Kernel - default log levels

2020-10-13 Thread David S.
Hi, I just spotted that there is a difference in the default log levels on Fedora and RHEL-8 vs RHEL-7. Fedora/RHEL-8 uses: # cat /proc/sys/kernel/printk 7 4 1 7 while RHEL-7 uses: # cat /proc/sys/kernel/printk 2 4 1 7 I also see that this seem

Re: Updating MUMPS/Sundials/PETSc

2020-04-08 Thread David S
On 4/7/20 12:51 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: On 06/04/20 16:19, David Schwörer wrote: On 4/5/20 6:06 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: On 04/04/20 19:23, David S wrote: On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. `MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming on Rawhide

Re: Updating MUMPS/Sundials/PETSc

2020-04-04 Thread David S
On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: Hi all. `MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming on Rawhide; these updates will need rebuilds of dependent packages: [:snip:] Thanks a lot for updating PETSc, I know PETSc is quite challenging to package. I tried to