Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora (OpenVPN related issues)

On Thu, 2021-02-25 at 11:57 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 22/02/2021 16:29, Petr Menšík wrote: > > Why? I thought about common interface to various DNS cache > > implementations for workstations and different VPN providers > > available. > > While I think the best place to direct, which inter

Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 15:14 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 11:20 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 16:40 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:18 pm, Chuck Anderson > > > > > > wrote: > > >

Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Tue, 2020-09-29 at 09:18 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Tuesday, September 29, 2020 5:13:48 AM MST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski- > Szmek > wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:41:12PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > > > On Monday, September 28, 2020 9:39:17 AM MST Michael Catanzaro > > >

Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 16:40 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:18 pm, Chuck Anderson > wrote: > > I think the VPN plugin and VPN server has some input, no? All the > > VPN > > servers I've used send routes to the VPN client to determine which > > traffic the client shoul

Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 23:37 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > On Monday, September 28, 2020 12:42:32 PM MST Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > On Mo, 28.09.20 12:14, Paul Wouters (p...@nohats.ca) wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't

Re: Fedora Workstation and disabled by default firewall

On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 09:15 -0400, Robert Marcano wrote: > On 8/26/19 9:07 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > > Well the thing is, blocknig ports tends to break applications that > > want > > to use those ports. We're not going to do that, period. It also > > doesn't > > really accomplish anything

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Lubomir Rintel (lkundrak)

On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 23:49 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > Does anyone know how to contact Lubomir Rintel (lkundrak)? He is > obviously still active since his last koji build is as recent as > last > Sunday the 11th, but he isn't answering to this ticket [1] and I > also > had no luck e-mai

Re: Testers for LCD Panel Self Refresh on laptops with Intel graphics wanted

On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 12:34 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > For the "Improved Laptop Battery Life" feature: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife > > I'm working on for Fedora 28 I would like to also try and enable > Panel Self Refresh on laptops with Intel

Re: No i686 kernel: Can we require SSE2 for i686?

On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 09:05 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:09 AM, Hans de Goede > wrote: > > > If the kernel team wants some specific help with ia32 support then > > 2 things need to happen: > > > > 1) A clear request for help needs to be send > > 2) What exactly they nee

Re: Nested rich-dependencies in rpm

On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 16:28 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > On 04/12/2017 04:19 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 02:56:24PM +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:08:46AM +0200, Björn 'besser82' > > > > Esser wrote: > > > > > I hope someone can help

Re: i915 firmware not in Fedora?

On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 12:26 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Tom Hughes wrote: > > > > On 12/12/16 18:56, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > > > > The firmware https://01.org/linuxgraphics/intel-linux-graphics-fi > > > rmwares > > > is not included in Fedora Workstation

Re: Docker/Libvirt networking issue / bug?

On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 12:39 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On Thu, 2016-10-06 at 14:28 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > > > I rarely mess with docker, but I expect that the docker0 bridge has > > an ip > > address on it which may conflict with the one on libvirt > > bridge.  That is to > > say,

Re: Disable ipv6 doesn't work

On Sun, 2016-08-07 at 08:31 +, jack smith wrote: > Hello, > > Disabling ipv6 in Gnome Control Center / Network / "My connection" > doesn't work. ifconfig show that an ipv6 is still attributed and the > problem I have with ipv6 enabled is still there (gone if I really > disable ipv6). NetworkM

Re: How to configure a network bridge from script ?

On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 09:36 +0300, Alexander Todorov wrote: > На 12.05.2016 в 15:32, Phil Sutter написа: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 02:47:19PM +0300, Alexander Todorov wrote: > > > > > > # cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-enp1s0f0 > > > Generated by dracut initrd > > The

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 13:32 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Samuel Sieb > wrote: > > On 01/26/2016 09:47 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > > > > > I still think that, for the default workstation use case, > > > configuring > > > a hostname as a mandatory part of

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 09:47 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Dan Williams > wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 19:43 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Peter Robinson < > > > p

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 19:43 -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Peter Robinson > wrote: > > > > > > > It is intended as a convenient fallback mechanism, and is > > > > > > > only supposed > > > > > > > to have an effect if 'gateway' is not defined in the > > > > > >

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainer - jklimes

On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 10:51 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 06 Jan 2016 09:46:32 -0600 > Dan Williams wrote: > > > On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses > > > for this packa

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainer - jklimes

On Tue, 2016-01-05 at 17:07 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still > interested > in maintaining their packages (and if so, hav

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 10:45 -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 09:33:18AM -0500, Neal Becker wrote: > > > P J P wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, 2 December 2015 6:33 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 16:09 +0100, Timotheus Pokorra wrote: > > is deployed in probably half of the homes in Germany... Also I am > > pretty sure other routers form other manufacturers do the same > > thing. Now, if we default to DNSSEC validation soon, does this mean > > Same for Vodafone Routers

Re: Some analysis on the size of the minimal and Server installs of Fedora 23

On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 11:32 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > > > > > "DW" == Dan Williams writes: > > DW> I suppose NM-tui could be pulled out of Server since not that > many > DW> other things require newt, and nmcli is always going to be ther

Re: Some analysis on the size of the minimal and Server installs of Fedora 23

On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 17:36 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > > > > > "DW" == Dan Williams writes: > > DW> Could you confirm what NetworkManager-* packages are installed on > DW> F23 server? > > On my custom install (which just lists t

Re: Some analysis on the size of the minimal and Server installs of Fedora 23

On Mon, 2015-11-16 at 20:39 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > b'NetworkManager': 138 NM does have a larger dep-chain than we'd like, however we did split the package apart a couple releases ago and made sure that WWAN, WiFi, and Bluetooth were no longer required for the server cases. Could you co

Re: Unexpected NIC naming f23 firewall implications

On Sun, 2015-11-08 at 20:36 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 08.11.2015 um 20:29 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > > On Sat, Nov 07, 2015 at 05:28:54PM +, Christopher wrote: > >> I recently updated my desktop to f23, and it went smoothly, for the most > >> part. However, it broke my mediatomb se

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 15:30 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Zach Villers said: > > If it helps, Sixxs (https://www.sixxs.net/main/) is a very highly > > recommended tunnel broker. I have not tried it and am not affiliated. I do > > have ipv6 capability from my isp, so could help with

Re: Summary of Thursday's call between GNOME and NM devels and Default DNS resolver change owners

On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 13:22 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Looks great! I've been using this daily on Fedora 21 and I have to > say it mostly works well EXCEPT for the captive portal detection stuff > which is just horrendously bad, so I'm happy to see a new design that > may work a lot better. W

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 14:32 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Dan Williams wrote: > > >> That is why HTTP redirection and DNS failure have to be detected by > >> whatever is the "hot spot detector". Both items weigh in on triggering > >

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 13:17 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote: > On 12.06.2015 18:58, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 10:58 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote: > >> On 11.06.2015 22:48, Dan Williams wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Mon, 2015-06-15 at 14:57 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: > On 12.6.2015 18:53, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 17:10 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >>>> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 14:41 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > >> > decision needs to

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 00:48 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jun 2015, Dan Williams wrote: > > > Unfortunately the Proposal doesn't say anything about how this will > > actually work, which is something NetworkManager needs to know. It also > > fails to ad

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 10:58 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote: > On 11.06.2015 22:48, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > >>> decision needs to then be made by the

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 17:10 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > >>> decision needs to then be made by the system. I believe that's been > >>> mostly due to lack of time for the va

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 10:20 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:58:14AM +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote: > > NetworkManager is pure network configuration manager in this scenario. > > We don't expect nor want NM to handle /etc/resolv.conf. We will only get > > the current network con

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > decision needs to then be made by the system. I believe that's been > > mostly due to lack of time for the various parties to sit down and > > plan and then program this furt

Re: Roaming, and libresolv being stuck in the 1980's mindset

On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 16:27 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: > On Apr 20, 2015, at 12:23 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 01:49:57PM -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: > >> If you go back through the previous glibc bugs, you'll find: > >> > >> https://sourceware.org/bugz

Re: Enable Wake-On-LAN in current Fedora

On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 09:12 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 04/14/2015 09:06 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Sergio Pascual said: > >> I was wondering what is the "correct" way of enabling WOL on a network > >> card. > > > > I think it is enabled by default. At least, I didn't do any

Re: Captive portal detection on wired connections - bug or feature?

/21-connectivity-local.conf > > connectivity interval 0 > > systemctl reload NetworkManager > > Take a look at > https://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2015/02/16/networkmanager-for-administrators-part-1 > it's Dan Williams' blog post I mentioned earlier. According to that, > y

Re: Captive portal detection on wired connections - bug or feature?

On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 18:29 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > You can edit /etc/NetworkManager/conf.d/20-connectivity-fedora.conf to > > disable it. > > > > Is there a *proper* way to do that so that there aren't any conflicts with

Re: Captive portal detection on wired connections - bug or feature?

On Thu, 2015-03-26 at 10:45 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 21:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > This was most likely caused by some issues with out proxy servers this > > evening. We were adding 3 new proxy servers into the rotation and there > > were some config issues with

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 08:42 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 04:21:51PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 08:18:12AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Lennart Poettering > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 23.0

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 17:43 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 02/20/2015 05:11 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > Also, NM fixed a similar issue with /etc/resolve.conf in their code a > > long time ago, to my knowledge. Am I so misguided to assume that > > Anaconda can fix a fricking file copy to

Re: initscripts

On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 06:19 +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > Dan Williams wrote: > >I'd also point out that there are three different NetworkManager GUIs, > >and one TUI: > > > >1) GNOME Shell network settings - not really targeted for server > >environments,

Re: Filing Bugs for Python 3 Switch

On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 11:09 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > Hi, > I just filed 2 bugs [A], [B] for the Python 3 switch [C] and I realized that > I should probably follow the mass bug filing policy. > As I've said previously, we've already had both Python 2 and Python 3 on > LiveCDs for few releas

Re: initscripts

On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 22:20 -0500, Scott Schmit wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 02:18:31PM -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > > NetworkManager is not intended only for mobile devices or notebooks, > > because that's a small part of the networking story. Plus, more than > >

Re: initscripts

On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 14:50 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 08:49 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > >> * KVM bridge configuration > > > > Works fine in F21+, I'm using NM on both my main desktop/test box and

Re: initscripts

On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 20:56 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 27.01.2015 um 20:50 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Adam Williamson > > wrote: > >> On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 08:49 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > >> > >>> * KVM bridge configuration > >> > >> Works fin

Re: initscripts

On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 14:50 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-01-25 at 08:49 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > >> * KVM bridge configuration > > > > Works fine in F21+, I'm using NM on both my main desktop/test box and

Re: Split DNS broken again - test case?

On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 14:29 -0600, Ian Pilcher wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161232 > > It seems like this is the 3rd or 4th time that this functionality has > been broken, leaving anyone who needs to simultaneously connect to both > VPN and other non-public (e.g. home netw

Re: "Workstation" Product defaults to wide-open firewall

On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 10:19 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > - Original Message - > > Hi, > > > > > > I also thought that the whole points of having Zones etc, was so that > > > > we could pick a different zone per network connection, > > > > /me too. > > > > > > so if I'm in the office

Re: Note: polkit daemon now optional (notably with NM)

On Sat, 2014-11-08 at 16:09 -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > I pushed: > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/polkit.git/commit/?id=1224d7b427a507339087e2f72c481b560c85149b > Built as: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8072916 > > Which makes polkit optional if NM (or anything else th

Re: iccjpeg.h errors

On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 18:57 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi Dan. > > On 11/05/2014 06:44 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 18:17 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > >> Hi all. > >> > >> I don't know how to fix these errors during I

Re: iccjpeg.h errors

On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 18:17 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi all. > > I don't know how to fix these errors during IceCat compilation. Lately I > tried to adapt Fedora compilations flags but there is wrong something. > > Here the log: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=8044663&na

Re: ModemManager & MBIM & QMI & USB_ModeSwitch

On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 09:26 +0200, poma wrote: > ModemManager > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/ModemManager > - update to 1.3.0 git3dd6f93, almost ready for the new 1.4 release. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125426 I actually did a full stack rebuild yesterday for the late

Re: [RFE/ENH] A network bandwidth monitor plugin for NetworkManager

On Tue, 2014-06-24 at 08:57 +0200, poma wrote: > We’ll Build A Dream House Of Net - by Dan Williams > http://blogs.gnome.org/dcbw/2014/06/20/well-build-a-dream-house-of-net/ > > Geez, are we done yet? > > Not even close! Seriously, there’s more b

Re: DNF: why does it refresh metadata all the time

On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 23:27 +0200, poma wrote: > On 20.06.2014 17:55, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 08:55 +0200, drago01 wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jared K. Smith > >> wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reind

Re: DNF: why does it refresh metadata all the time

On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 08:55 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Jared K. Smith > wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Reindl Harald > > wrote: > >> > >> if *that* is what is supposed to make DNF faster it's just a lie > > > > > > This is not the only thing that DNF doe

Re: NetworkManager-0.9.95 update in rawhide

On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 12:00 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21:37 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Thomas Haller wrote: > >> > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21

Re: NetworkManager-0.9.95 update in rawhide

On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21:37 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Thomas Haller wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 21:25 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> After latest update i can't use my wifi in NM. Probably this bug not > >> in NM, but I don't know how to de

Re: Don't use at_console in DBus policy files

On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fedora 20, I'm seeing this list: > > /etc/dbus-1/system.d/nm-ifcfg-rh.conf: > NetworkManager-1:0.9.9.0-38.git20131003.fc20.x86_64 > /etc/dbus-1/system.d/nm-user-settings.conf: sugar-0:0.100.2-1.fc20.noarch > /etc/dbus-1/system.d/or

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:12 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:06:51PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > >> On Wed,

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 15:36 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > Why would you care for the domain name as provided by dhcp ? > > internal DNS views, eg server.internal.corp.com where the search domain > gets set to "internal.corp.com" and "server.corp.com" do

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 13:22 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Robert Marcano wrote: > > > What about domain and search lines? If NetworkManager will always use > > 127.0.0.1, it should still modify resolv.conf with the domain name received > > from DHCP > > That's actually not a

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 22:10 +0800, P J P wrote: >Hello, > > On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 7:22 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > >So what exactly happens on upgrade? Before the upgrade, > >most resolv.conf files will not point to 127.0.0.1. > >What will they point to after the upgrade, and if they will

Re: default local DNS failover solution needed, nscd?

On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 10:14 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > > > Speaking of which, I am not sure how dnsmasq plays with DNSSEC and/or > > failover, but NetworkManager already has a config option > > (/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf, dns=

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 12:00 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Dan Williams wrote: > > > But another scenario I've seen: older Netgear routers which intercept > > "www.routerlogin.net" as the setup page. The instructions literally > > are:

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 10:21 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > > Or how would you suggest this is solved. For arguments sake lets > > say: > > > > SSID: myawesomeopenhotspot > > DHCP provides no domain-name info. > > I CNAME all records to my.hotspot. until authenticated. > > If this does not do http(s)

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 14:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:39:34 -0400 (EDT) > Paul Wouters wrote: > > ...snip... > > > I've been running this solution on fedora for about five years now. It > > works reasonably well, and anyone who is on this list surely has could > > try it

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 03:35 +0800, P J P wrote: >Hello Dan, > > > On Saturday, 12 April 2014 12:51 AM, Dan Williams wrote: > > NM has had local caching nameserver capability built-in since Fedora 12 > > or something like that. Set 'dns=dnsmasq'

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 14:21 -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 02:33 +0800, P J P wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > On Thursday, 10 April 2014 11:39 PM, P J P wrote: > > > I plan to file a feature/change request for this one. I got caught up >

Re: default local DNS caching name server

On Sat, 2014-04-12 at 02:33 +0800, P J P wrote: > Hello, > > > On Thursday, 10 April 2014 11:39 PM, P J P wrote: > > I plan to file a feature/change request for this one. I got caught up with > > other > > work this past week so could not do it. Will start with it right away. > > Please se

Re: NetworkManager "forget" user network configurations: bug or feature?

On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 16:57 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > El 26/03/14 12:45, Stephen John Smoogen escribió: > > > > > > > > On 25 March 2014 13:53, Sergio Belkin > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Adam, > > > > I've found that by default when I create a user, the checkbox

Re: NetworkManager "forget" user network configurations: bug or feature?

On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:53 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > 2014-03-25 16:20 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson : > > > On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:19 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > > Hi Fedora folks, > > > > > > Since NetworkManager I suffer the same issue, release after release, ok, > > > it's not a Fedora i

Re: Packaging changes on NetworkManager? Whither NetworkManager-glib...

On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 10:04 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote: > Did something recently change with the packaging of NetworkManager? > > I’m not finding NetworkManager-glib, just NetworkManager-glib-devel: Outdated mirrors perhaps? It's clearly in the repos: http://mirror.cc.vt.edu/pub/fedora/lin

Re: F20: what connects the lid switch to triggering suspend?

On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 02:21 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 17.03.14 17:18, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > systemd-inhibit --list > > > > Thanks... > > > > *drum roll* > > > > The offending package was telepathy

Re: F20: what connects the lid switch to triggering suspend?

On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 17:41 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:38:31AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > > The lid switch is exposed as input device in Linux. logind opens that > > > device and reacts on it. However it gives DEs the chance

Re: F20: what connects the lid switch to triggering suspend?

On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 01:45 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 13.03.14 18:07, Martin Langhoff (martin.langh...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > My Lenovo X220, running up-to-date F20 occasionally gets into a state where > > closing the laptop lid does not trigger suspend. > > > > I want to narrow

Re: Read this if your package includes a status notifier / system tray icon

On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 00:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matthias Clasen wrote: > > Please stop rewriting history. The spec was proposed, flaws were pointed > > out in the review, and there was no willingness to address those flaws > > in any meaningful way. > > The purported "flaws" were of 2 kin

Re: ModemManager update

On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 19:00 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2014-02-13 at 12:56 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 15:03 +0100, poma wrote: > > > With a companion libraries. ;) > > > > > > ↗ libmbim-1.6.0 > > &

Re: ModemManager update

On Sat, 2014-02-01 at 15:03 +0100, poma wrote: > With a companion libraries. ;) > > ↗ libmbim-1.6.0 > ↗ libqmi-1.8.0 > ↗ ModemManager-1.2.0 > > > poma > > > Oh Danny boy, the pipes, the pipes are calling > From glen to glen, and down the mountain side > The summer's gone, and all the flowers a

Re: RFC - Downgrade BlueZ to v4.101 in Fedora 20

On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 17:24 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > From the BlueZ 5.0 release notes: > > > > "Remove internal support for telephony (HFP and HSP) profiles. They > > should be implemented using the new Profile interface preferably by the > > telephony subsystem of ch

Re: RFC - Downgrade BlueZ to v4.101 in Fedora 20

On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 12:21 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 23/01/14 21:19, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 14:17 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > >> On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:04 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > >>> On 23/01/14 19:58, Frank Murphy wrote:

Re: RFC - Downgrade BlueZ to v4.101 in Fedora 20

On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 16:58 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:04 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > > > > Nope, several packages depends on the bluez-5.13-1 package. > > Indeed. However I could probably live without gnome-bluetooth if > blueman were still available. > > pu

Re: RFC - Downgrade BlueZ to v4.101 in Fedora 20

On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 14:17 -0600, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:04 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > > On 23/01/14 19:58, Frank Murphy wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:53:19 +0100 > > > David Sommerseth wrote: > > > > > >> >

Re: RFC - Downgrade BlueZ to v4.101 in Fedora 20

On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:04 +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 23/01/14 19:58, Frank Murphy wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:53:19 +0100 > > David Sommerseth wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> This might be a viewed as a fire torch, but there is, IMO, a major > >> regression in BlueZ 5 whic

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

past. I'd encourage you to try out these changes in F20 and beyond, and if you find problems, by all means file bugs and we'll work to fix them. Dan > On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz > wrote: > > On 16.01.2014 21:38, Dan Williams wrote: > &g

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 17:35 +0100, Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: > On 16.01.2014 21:38, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > >> > >> On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 14:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > > On 16/01/14 14:39, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > > > > On 16/01/14 14:09, Dan Williams wrote: > >> Also, if wouldn't mind passing along the systemd journal output for > >> NetworkManager

Re: NetworkManager Bridges in Fedora

On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 13:53 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > Has anybody had any luck with getting bridges > consistently up in running in either F19 or F20? > I know I have not... > > I go into setup/networks. Add a bridge which creates > two file in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts > >

Re: PSA: If you are C/C++ developer, use cppcheck

On Tue, 2013-12-17 at 12:17 -0500, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > In the last few days, I have been running cppcheck on quite a few programs > including systemd, transmission, libvirt, ndjbdns etc and cppcheck has > found real and potential bugs (null pointer dereferences, uninitialized > variabl

Re: TLS libraries and licenses

On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 09:27 -0700, Jerry James wrote: > For one package for which I am part of upstream, we are talking about > adding TLS support. The upstream project is GPLv3+. We're looking at > the preferred list of crypto implementations on > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsol

Re: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 12:50 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 10/31/2013 02:03 AM, rran...@ihug.com.au wrote: > > I have run into an issue which seems to call into question the udev > > paradigm for USB devices. In my case it has ramifications in > > ModemManager and gpsd packages, but I see i

Re: Fatal flaw in the udev paradigm?

On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 11:49 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote: > Can you wildcard the greylist so that modemmanager *never* runs? I > haven't used a modem in decades but MM keeps mucking with all my > serial-connected toys. You can do anything you want with the udev rules. Just put them in /etc/udev/rules

Re: gnome-boxes downgrade in F-19

On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 08:42 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > Do you remember when I ranted about lack of communication between > provenpackagers and the maintainers of the packages they touch [1]? > Here is another case of lack of communication between people touching > the same package. > > On Aug 8,

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

On Fri, 2013-09-13 at 11:23 +0300, Oron Peled wrote: > On Friday 13 September 2013 01:51:00 drago01 wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Oron Peled wrote: > > >- This means that any privileged service controlled by GUI client (e.g: > > > NetworkManager) is still only as secure as i

Re: Multiple Loopback Interfaces

On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 15:46 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 29.08.2013 15:38, schrieb John Chludzinski: > > I need to used multiple loopback addresses (interfaces) for an server > > application that communicates with multiple clients running on the same > > machine. Since a loopback interface

Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.

On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 18:36 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Stefan Held wrote: > >> What exactly is holding the Updates back in Fedora? > >> Is there a reason for excluding the 5.x Series? > > > > > >

Re: Obsoleting ConsoleKit once and for all

On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 23:03 +0200, Lars Seipel wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:28:55PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > thunar and pcmanfm are file managers and require ConsoleKit for handling > > removable storage. > > Are you sure you aren't confusing this with something? HAL maybe? The

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Adding NetworkManager Connections via CLI

On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 11:46 -0700, David Strauss wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:12 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > Support for adding new NetworkManager connections using the nmcli > > commandline > > tool. > > This would be wonderful to have on servers. That is exactly the use-case we're ta

  1   2   3   >