Re: Removing python-setuptools-devel backwards compat

2014-04-19 Thread Dan Scott
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> I'd like to drop the >> backwards compatibility Provides (and Obsoletes) from the python-setuptools >> package. However, there are currently 166 packages BuildRequire'ing >> pytho

Re: Reinstalling the bootloader

2014-04-08 Thread Dan Scott
On Apr 8, 2014 3:19 AM, "Fred New" wrote: snip >> >> > And since Windows on my system places itself first in the EFI boot list >> > every time it >> > is booted, >> >> That's likely an issue in your system's firmware or Windows install >> (somehow). It shouldn't be doing that. > > > Yes, it seem

Re: Tests fail in mock env : unable to import BuildRequires Python module

2014-03-12 Thread Dan Scott
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Dan Scott wrote: > > On Mar 12, 2014 2:28 PM, "Josh Stone" wrote: >> >> On 03/12/2014 10:42 AM, Dan Scott wrote: >> > Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070074 I'm working on >> > updating python-r

Re: Tests fail in mock env : unable to import BuildRequires Python module

2014-03-12 Thread Dan Scott
On Mar 12, 2014 2:28 PM, "Josh Stone" wrote: > > On 03/12/2014 10:42 AM, Dan Scott wrote: > > Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070074 I'm working on > > updating python-rdflib to 4.1.1, but currently having trouble with a > > new dependency

Tests fail in mock env : unable to import BuildRequires Python module

2014-03-12 Thread Dan Scott
Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070074 I'm working on updating python-rdflib to 4.1.1, but currently having trouble with a new dependency on python-html5lib. The problem is that running a mock build fails as a few tests claim they were unable to import html5lib; this is perfectly

Re: Major release number bump is lower than beta for html5lib module.

2014-03-04 Thread Dan Scott
On Mar 3, 2014 9:39 PM, "Adam Williamson" wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 11:05 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Reindl Harald wrote: > > > yes it is a hack but better than fake version numbers to > > > satisfy RPM and that is *the* reason epoch exists at all > > > > +1 > > > > That Ubuntu-style ap

Re: State of Python 3 as default in Fedora

2014-03-04 Thread Dan Scott
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi, > > I've just published a blogpost that summarizes what's going on with Python > 3 as default in Fedora. > > You can find it here: > > http://eng.hroncok.cz/2014/02/12/python3-fedora-default/ > > Feel free to post any comments on my blog

Re: Security update process without CVEs

2014-01-21 Thread Dan Scott
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:26:19 -0500 > Dan Scott wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> A few hours ago I submitted requests to push perl-MARC-XML directly to >> stable (by filling out the "fedpkg update" reque

Re: Security update process without CVEs

2014-01-21 Thread Dan Scott
Eric: On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Eric H. Christensen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:26:19PM -0500, Dan Scott wrote: >> I tried following >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Tracking_Bugs?rd=Securit

Security update process without CVEs

2014-01-21 Thread Dan Scott
Hi: A few hours ago I submitted requests to push perl-MARC-XML directly to stable (by filling out the "fedpkg update" request with type=security and request=stable) I tried following https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security_Tracking_Bugs?rd=Security/TrackingBugs but it appears to depend on waiting

[perl-MARC-XML/f19] Bump to 1.0.1

2013-07-24 Thread Dan Scott
commit 6c1a7a75405173022784629b895662e78686d333 Author: Dan Scott Date: Wed Jul 24 17:21:11 2013 -0400 Bump to 1.0.1 Signed-off-by: Dan Scott .gitignore |1 + perl-MARC-XML.spec | 10 +++--- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4