Excerpts from Dan Callaghan's message of 2022-03-06 20:13:26 +11:00:
> python-phonenumbers
I took python-phonenumbers back. I forgot that it's in the dependency
chain of matrix-synapse which I very much still use.
--
Dan Callaghan
___
runt-sed
python-aiohttp-negotiate
python-blessings
python-fastimport
python-lrparsing
python-nose-progressive
python-ofxparse
python-phonenumbers
python-plyvel
python-pystalk
python-unidiff
qcommandline
--
Dan Callaghan
___
devel mailin
Starting from version 3.5.0 the python-pytest-randomly package has
changed license from BSD to MIT. I will build this update for rawhide
shortly.
--
Dan Callaghan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Excerpts from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek's message of 2018-08-28 08:38 +00:00:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 04:56:58PM +1000, Dan Callaghan wrote:
> > What does it mean for a package to be owned by orphan while it still
> > has other admins who are real people?
> >
>
ough there are still other maintainers? Is there any record where
we can see when or why these changes were made?
And is the solution here that one of the existing co-maintainers should
just go into the Pagure settings and click... some button to become the
"main admin" so that it'
ng on for all their
packages because it makes it quite easy to find problems like this.
(Sadly, you do get a bit more noise when pushes something that breaks
the entire distro, but it's still worth it.)
--
Dan Callaghan
Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies DevOps
Red Hat
si
gevent 1.2.x, I filed bug 1459389.
For all other callers of gevent, please check if your package might be
affected. Note that the first upstream alpha of 1.2.x was first released
more than 9 months ago, so callers should have adjusted to the changes
upstream by now.
--
Dan Callaghan
Senior
,
"repositories of RPM packages with metadata in the format originated by
yum").
In that case, yum.repos.d still seems reasonable to me, but if you
*really* want to avoid the word "yum" in there then maybe
package-repos.d or package.repos.d or packagerepos.d?
--
D
lds in C.UTF-8 instead of en_US.UTF-8? Or fixed by ensuring that
en_US.UTF-8 is available in the build environment (by adding it to the
Koji build group I guess)? Or some other fix?
--
Dan Callaghan
Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
De
ecause the only alternative
would be to make it x86-only?
--
Dan Callaghan
Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
the doc subpackage on only one arch?
%ifarch x86_64
%package doc
BuildArch: noarch
...
%endif
I think Koji still counts this a regular noarch subpackage and it should
therefore be included in the Fedora trees for all arches.
--
Dan Callaghan
Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Op
This was intended for erlang@ not devel@, I will resend it there. My
apologies for the noise.
--
Dan Callaghan
Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
>
>
> Orphans (rawhide) for at least 6 weeks (not dependend on) (2):
> jackrabbit mercury
>
>
> Depending packages (rawhide) (29): accumulo amplab-tachyon avro
> eclipse-jbosstools glusterfs-hadoop hadoop hbase hibernate
> hibernate-hql hibernate-search h
and in
the web UI?
I want to enable release monitoring on all my packages but I've lost
track of which ones were correctly configured on the old wiki page.
Also, will Anitya warn me somehow if a configuration becomes invalid
later (because upstream changed their hosting or similar)?
--
Dan C
for Prosody in F21+, right? Or
is something else needed?
--
Dan Callaghan
Software Engineer, Hosted & Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedor
be willing to take these packages
from Johan?
I can join as comaintainer too if you need help. I run Prosody at home
so I'm keen to see it maintained.
--
Dan Callaghan
Software Engineer, Hosted & Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
lping maintain it,
please get in touch with me.
--
Dan Callaghan
Software Engineer, Hosted & Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Cod
permissive license, I don't see any
problems.
--
Dan Callaghan
Software Engineer, Hosted & Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Cond
.fc20.x86_64
>
> (among many others). Any hints on how I can figure out what went wrong
> with the labelling of /usr/sbin/sshd?
Oh, I forgot that the yum upgrade on 24 Feb was actually from F19->F20,
just like Philip who originally started this thread.
I suppose that means we just
pgrade. The updated packages included:
selinux-policy-3.12.1-122.fc20.noarch
openssh-server-6.4p1-3.fc20.x86_64
(among many others). Any hints on how I can figure out what went wrong
with the labelling of /usr/sbin/sshd?
--
Dan Callaghan
Software Engineer, Hosted & Shared Services
Red Hat, Inc.
Excerpts from Jason L Tibbitts III's message of Mon Jul 02 07:38:40 +1000 2012:
> >>>>> "DC" == Dan Callaghan writes:
>
> DC> I will take all three (they look straightforward :-) in exchange for
> DC> saslwrapper:
>
> Since you appear to b
bug.cgi?id=823236
> sugar-locosugar: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836708
I will take all three (they look straightforward :-) in exchange for
saslwrapper:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828626
--
Dan Callaghan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
deve
22 matches
Mail list logo
