Should a binary allowed to self-update ?

Dear packagers, On my road to package http://exercism.io CLI, I need to provide a self-update feature [1] for Golang-coded binaries. After a look at the packaging guidelines, I am not sure if it is allowed to package binaries with such a feature. To me, it should be discarded as the rpm provided b

Re: Fedora Rawhide glibc-2.22.90-6.fc24 shipping C.UTF-8 locale.

Hello Carlos, Thank you very much for such an advancement. This feature will allow any software to fallback on a fully internationalized locale. -- Clément David A non ASCII user Le 18 sept. 2015 07:06, "Carlos O'Donell" a écrit : > Thanks to some great work by Mike FABIAN the Rawhide glibc is

Re: scilab build failure C++ ABI?

> On 05/17/2015 05:46 PM, Jerry James wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Orion Poplawski > > wrote: >> >> and it's linked into other libraries in the build okay. What else >> could be going on? >> >> >> Add "export LDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro" just above you

Re: gcc5 C++11 ABI rebuilds and FTBFS packages

> scilab:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651483 Updated and fixed at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9664653 -- davidcl -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct

Re: Heads-up on rpm 4.12 coming to rawhide soon

Hi, AFAIK Fedora packages should not use weak dependencies (Recommends and so on). What's the recommended usage of them ? Is there any plan to update Packaging Guidelines on this topic ? For instance: for scilab I split scilab binary and help to reduce the size of the main package. The help pac