Matt has started a poll with regards to the community's preferences
about the topic:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/straw-poll-on-your-preferences-about-opt-in-opt-out-for-possible-data-collection/85675/2
On 7/12/23 12:37, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, 2023-07-11 08:17:07 -050
Matt has started a poll with regards to the community's preferences
about the topic:
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/straw-poll-on-your-preferences-about-opt-in-opt-out-for-possible-data-collection/85675/2
On 7/12/23 12:37, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday, 2023-07-11 08:17:07 -0500,
23 16:01, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 8:38 AM Christopher Klooz via devel
wrote:
Hi,
I was testing an instance of the LXQt Spin in a VM and saw that after
updating all packages, the LXQt packages are still with version 1.1.0,
which is from April 2022. Current is 1.3.0.
I read the
Hi,
I was testing an instance of the LXQt Spin in a VM and saw that after
updating all packages, the LXQt packages are still with version 1.1.0,
which is from April 2022. Current is 1.3.0.
I read the LXQt team does not maintain itself, and 1.2.0 and 1.3.0 seem
to not contain critical securit
ues could both be explained by an acpi-related bug).
I already asked Justin to change the BZ# in Bodhi.
On 6/14/23 10:43, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Christopher,
On 6/13/23 23:26, Christopher Klooz via devel wrote:
In case you are already aware of the issue, feel free to ignore this mail. I
j
In case you are already aware of the issue, feel free to ignore this
mail. I just want to make aware that there could be multiple
interrelated (bug) reports that might be considered in conjunction and
not on their own, given that the amount of affected users is above
average (I could imagine th
