Hi!
Thank you for the clarification.
How about two different packages which do not depend on each other
having both files/directories below /xyz/?
I assume in this case co-ownership of /xyz/ should be used?
Is this rule general valid or are there exceptions?
Icon sizes: https://bugzilla.redhat.
Hi!
I have written and also tried to solve
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293749
but I am somehow stuck.
I reinstalled a fresh rawhide (from
Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-Rawhide-20240709.n.0.iso)
but I still get the following:
RPM does not know about this directory:
$ rpm -qf
Hi,
as a follow-up to my attempt to clean up missing directories in RPM
database, the following questions arose:
Who should own the directories for "non-standard" icon sizes?
Is there a defined set of standard sizes?
Please see also BZ#2284088: How should this be solved?
Thank you for any sup
Hi!
Am 01.05.24 um 19:58 schrieb Jens-Ulrik Petersen:
On Thu, May 2, 2024 at 1:21 AM Christoph Karl via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
I tried to find out which files on my upgraded fc40 installation are not
installed via dnf/rpm.
The list is surprisingly long.
Perha
Hi!
I tried to find out which files on my upgraded fc40 installation are not
installed via dnf/rpm.
The list is surprisingly long.
Main reasons are symlinks and directories not defined in the spec file.
A quick check shows that this is also the case with a fresh installation.
I see three reason
Hi!
+1
The sequence must be: measure -> think -> act.
Not:
act (in panic) ->
think (oh, that ist not the correct way, or even worse: oh, this is the
way the attacker wants us to go.)
measure (we have a weakness)
Best regards
Christoph
Am 04.04.24 um 20:11 schrieb Leon Fauster via devel:
One
+1
Am 01.04.24 um 06:31 schrieb Scott Schmit:
One approach:
1. do the build
2. do the install
3. generate the RPMs
4. quarantine the RPMs so they're safe from modification
- I believe this could be done via SELinux policy
- there are probably other mechanisms
5. run the tests
- for S
