On Sunday 12 January 2025 21:25:17 Central European Standard Time Zbigniew
Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > My concern is that this defeats most methods of observability. It's
> > essentially the same as the double-fork problem we used to have with
> > system services. The stub will fork out and exec
Hi Vitaly,
if I understand the proposal correctly, the consequences will be far less
dramatic than you believe.
> So all Fedora packages will take 2x (x86_64-v1, x86_64-v2) disk space?
> Am I right?
1. Not all packages but only those whose maintainers explicitly opt in.
2. The duplication will
Hi all,
On Sunday, 21 August 2022 17:29:56 CEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> I don't disagree that glibc should respect what distros set, I'm just
> asking us to build glibc with a DT_HASH table added until a formal
> deprecation/retirement cycle is done with all stakeholders aware of
> the change and ever
Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 08:00:18AM +0200, Christoph Erhardt wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I'm willing to revive python-jenkins-job-builder by updating it to the
> >latest
release 4.0.0 and backporting an upstream patch.
> >
Hi all,
I'm willing to revive python-jenkins-job-builder by updating it to the latest
release 4.0.0 and backporting an upstream patch.
I already have a working Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/
sicherha/python-jenkins-job-builder/packages/
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com
Hi list,
the recent mimalloc update from 2.0.3 to 2.0.5 has brought a subtle, yet
consequential, soname change (or rather addition) that affects the package's
`Provides:` list.
mimalloc-2.0.3-1 contains the library file
* `/usr/lib64/libmimalloc.so.2.0`
... and thus provides:
* `libmimalloc.so.
Hi Florian,
> Yes, I understood that. x86_64 buildroots only have x86_64 packages in
> Koji. You cannot build and run 32-bit binaries (unless you put them
> together completely from scratch, without help from i686 RPM packages).
alright, thank you for clarifying!
Curiously though, the Koji buil
22 19:08:39 CET Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Florian Weimer:
>
>
> > * Christoph Erhardt:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > We do not support cross-building, so you'd have to use a 32-bit builder
> > for building 32-bit binaries (which does n
Hi list,
I'm trying to build mold for epel8. A bunch of mold's unit tests produce
statically linked 32-bit binaries, so on x86_64 we need a build dependency on
a static multilib glibc.
I have learnt that multilib build dependencies are a tricky thing in Koji, and
the only solution I have found
Hi all,
I'd like to briefly introduce myself to the Fedora developer community. I'm
Christoph, 37 years old, based in Nuremberg (Germany). I often go by the
pseudonym 'sicherha'.
With a degree in computer science, I originally stuck around in academia
before leaving with a PhD in the field of o
10 matches
Mail list logo
