On Sun, 2013-11-03 at 14:42 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Christian Schaller wrote:
> > The PRD avoids these questions by design. To often open source discussions
> > end up being discussions about the merits of the means as opposed to the
> > actual goals.
>
> Well, I disagree about the basic deci
Hi everyone,
Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
proposal tries to be relatively high level and focus on goals and
principles, but I have included some concrete examples at times to try
to provide some clarity on how the goals and principles could play out
in practice.
Hi Jóhann,
I do agree with you that the interaction between Red Hat and Fedora
needs to be clearer, and that currently it is a bit vaguely defined and
thus it gives ground to conspiracy theories and feelings of
disenfranchisement.
That said I think you too need to be open to that Red Hat, like yo
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 16:20 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> (/me notes that if mattdm's Ring 1 was defined, this might be somewhat
> easier to decide upon. If sendmail was in Ring 1 it would be an expected
> part of the Fedora Platform. Anything general purpose and carrying the name
> Fedora wou
