> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 13:10, James Ralston Personally I would have preferred to call this a new tool versus trying to
> use dnf name still. It makes it clearer that the break is going to happen.
How about going back to yum? The yum name never completely went away in RHEL
docs and still linger
Old rpm-ostree thread about this:
https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/issues/1127
1. Debian provides a comparably sized package catalog using one-tenth the size
of Fedora's metadata. Are there any lessons that Fedora can learn from Debian?
2. Does SUSE have the same problem?
___
Doesn't rpm-ostree already provide transactional, image-based updates without
the use of filesystem snapshots? In addition, roofs snapshots are only really
useful if they are coordinated with bootloader management, which is already
built into rpm-ostree but not yet written for a hypothetical btr
