Hello :)

Hello to everyone, my name is Carlos i'm from Chile and I've fedora collaborator in QA since F20. but now i want collaborate as maintainer package. well I've create my first review request. it's a library for shortening of URL page. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246974 i would appr

Firewalld enable by default in Fedora 22

I install F22 workstation today and well firewalld is enable by default. So the disable firewall in F21 is out ? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Disable_Firewall#Workstation:_Disable_firewall [empateinfinito@localhost ~]$ systemd-analyze Startup finished in 1.718s (kernel) + 4

Fedora 22 | Firefox 35 | Adwaita Dark Theme

Hi folks today i update to F22 Workstation ( fresh install ) and well when the adwaita dark theme is active, the textfield of Firefox 35 have as background color ( white) and the text have the same color. here a example of devel list page firefox + adwaita dark https://ipomoeba.fedorapeople.org/_s

Self Introduction: Carlos Morel-Riquelme && Package Review

Hi folks, my name is Carlos Morel-Riquelme 'im from chile and also i'm contributor of Fedora Project since F20 in testing, also i'm part of QA Team. Well my skills are Ruby and GTK ( not to much ), but i hope collaborate more in this project. Well today i've packed a new font

Re: Mock return error code 127

Thanks guys, Michael a have a question, can i submit the package review or i need wait that this issues is fixed ? On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:50:03 -0300, Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote: > > > Hi folks, i've packed a ne

Mock return error code 127

Hi folks, i've packed a new font, also i've create the rpm and srpm, also i 've installed in my laptop and looks fine, i've read the guidelines for create the package, but when i run fedora-review i have the error 127 in mock. here is the output [empateinfinito@localhost review]$ fedora-review --m

Re: Cinnamon Spin

Dan, thank for the new but the download links for the spin (wiki skeleton) isn't available :( On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Dan Book wrote: > On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dan Book wrote: > >> Hello, >> I have put together a basic Cinnamon Live spin, and was wondering if this >> is some

Issue with fedora-packager, mock and python

Hi folks, i try to run fedora packager over spec and src.rpm files before created, but i always have this error: [empateinfinito@localhost review]$ fedora-review --mock-config fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -n ssr INFO: Processing local files: ssr INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : Local files in /h

Re: Pitivi 0.94 Icon missing

Reported, Thank Reindl for the suggestion :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183405 On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 18.01.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Carlos Morel-Riquelme: > >> Hi folks, I installed pitivi in my F21 and F22 , but the app do

Pitivi 0.94 Icon missing

Hi folks, I installed pitivi in my F21 and F22 , but the app don't have the icon, obviously this isn't a but but i think that is important report. Info terminal [empateinfinito@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep -i pitivi pitivi-0.94-4.fc21.x86_64 [empateinfinito@localhost ~]$ here is a screenshot >

Self Introduction Carlos Morel-Riquelme

Hi folks, mi name is carlos morel-riquelme, i start using linux since 2008 with ubuntu but i change to fedora since fedora 15, now in fedora always try to collaborate in testing and translate to spanish some wiki pages. Now i made a little Ruby app it's my first package for fedora so, i ne

Re: Branched iso

thank so much dan :) On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:12 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Carlos Morel-Riquelme > wrote: > > Hi guys , i have a question , i use fedora 20 branched and work fine , > also > > i can contribute to the comunity send bugs

Branched iso

Hi guys , i have a question , i use fedora 20 branched and work fine , also i can contribute to the comunity send bugs error and testing new packages :) , now i don't now if i can update to fedora 21 branched when this is out. its possible ? Regards -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: different version of packages in testing and rawhide

thank so much adam :) On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 05:03 -0300, Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote: > > Hi guys i have running rawhide in my laptop and is update , all work > > fine for me > > but i don't understand why upd

different version of packages in testing and rawhide

Hi guys i have running rawhide in my laptop and is update , all work fine for me but i don't understand why update-testing have different version of packages in comparison with rawhide example the following builds have been pushed to Fedora 20 updates-testing NetworkManager-0.9.9.0-29.git2014013