On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 20:00 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 15:50 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> >
> > That page suggests that when abrt is in use, core files would be
> > generated in the location set by abrt, which defaults
> > to /var/spool/a
re named /var/users/$USER/dump
(or similar). How do I do that and continue to play nicely with abrt?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Dec 5, 2012, at 3:35 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 00:08 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 12:06 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>>> I posted about this a couple of days ago to the test list; but I've gotten
>>>
I posted about this a couple of days ago to the test list; but I've gotten no
response so I'm fishing here.
I'm not sure if this is a genuine freeze; but I have not managed to elicit a
response to keyboard/mouse input.
When booting Fedora 18 Beta, I see this:
> dracut-cmdline[121]: /etc/locale
On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 21:22 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El Thu, 17 May 2012 21:51:40 -0400
> Braden McDaniel escribió:
> > On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 14:56 +, build...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > >
> > > openvrml has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
>
equires java-1.6.0-openjdk(x86-32)
> Please resolve this as soon as possible.
openvrml BuildRequires java-devel. At first, I though the provider for
java-devel just changed and I happened to be unlucky timing-wise; so I
rebuilt openvrml. But I'm still seeing this. How come?
--
Braden McDanie
On Sun, 2012-05-06 at 09:34 +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On 6 May 2012 03:19, "Braden McDaniel" wrote:
> >
> > Does mock have problems with non-local user accounts? When I do
> >
> >$ fedpkg mockbuild
> >
> > I get:
> >
>
ming from LDAP?
(And where is the proper place to report mock bugs? fedorahosted trac
or Red Hat Bugzilla?)
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
in
homogeneous environments; supporting heterogeneous environments just
wasn't the point.
My impression is that NFS-mounted /usr is pretty uncommon these
days--and perhaps unheard-of using Linux.
NFS-mounted $HOME, however, continues to be relatively common and
certainly warrants consideration.
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 10:35 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> As it stands, ~/bin and ~/.local/bin are only appropriate for binaries
> that are not arch-specific.
Ahem. s/binaries/executables/
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
27;t exactly far-fetched.
I typically use ~/`config.guess`/bin.
As it stands, ~/bin and ~/.local/bin are only appropriate for binaries
that are not arch-specific. Any "standard" that doesn't take that into
account needs some improvement.
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:11 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 à 00:01 -0400, Braden McDaniel a écrit :
>
> > Can someone explain (or point to) the rationale appending these to PATH
> > rather than prepending them? I would have expected user binarie
$HOME/.local/bin:$HOME/bin
>
> Never knew about ~/.local/bin my .bash_profile is really old from the
> time where the default was only ~/bin
Can someone explain (or point to) the rationale appending these to PATH
rather than prepending them? I would have expected user binaries to
supersede system ones.
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ure: error: ltdl.h not found
The package has:
BuildRequires: libtool-ltdl-devel
Why might this be happening? Did ltdl.h get moved?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
bug being reopened with the new stack
trace attached?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
upgrading to
this version.)
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 20:23 -0800, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> On 02/13/2011 12:32 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > Isn't there yet more breakage coming, as well?
> >
> >
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.tech.js-engine/5uQ9oIPyio4
>
ce/JS_CStringsAreUTF8
>
Isn't there yet more breakage coming, as well?
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.tech.js-engine/5uQ9oIPyio4
Perhaps we should just wait for this?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:18 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/09/2011 12:31 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:36 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 09 February 2011 06:1
disable-dependency-tracking \\\
>
> So maybe I need to add
> autoreconf --force
> before
> %configure
> to regenerate configure for new option.
>
> Nope. Still same error.
>
> Any ideas?
What package is this? Are you quite certain its configure is
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:36 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 February 2011 06:10:25, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > Something in a recent round of updates seems to have hosed use of
> > LDAP-based user accounts for my rawhide installation. (My LDAP server
> > is on a d
Something in a recent round of updates seems to have hosed use of
LDAP-based user accounts for my rawhide installation. (My LDAP server
is on a different machine; the rawhide one just doesn't seem to be able
to use it.)
Is anyone else seeing this?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 11:04 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 08.02.11 04:44, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
>
> > > > > what does "systemctl status NetworkManager.service" say?
> > > >
> > > > After booting and l
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 09:16 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 04.02.11 13:31, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 21:12 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Mon, 31.01.11 02:22, Braden McDaniel (
On 2/4/11 4:11 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 15:41 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> On 2/4/11 3:10 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
[snip]
>>> Could we please either have boost.m4 packaged in Fedora, or at least
>>> changes for running with the latest
On 2/4/11 3:10 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:33 +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's
>> now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation
>> for final release that should be out
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 21:12 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 31.01.11 02:22, Braden McDaniel (bra...@endoframe.com) wrote:
>
> > I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
> > that NetworkManager never seems to start on
On 2/1/11 6:02 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 02/01/2011 05:05 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> On 1/31/11 4:04 PM, Naheem Zaffar wrote:
>>> There seems to be an SElinux denial for me which stops it from starting
>>> (I upgraded from Fedora 14 and its NOT a live machine).
On 2/3/11 1:33 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 02:22 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> I've recently set up a virtual machine running rawhide and I've noticed
>> that NetworkManager never seems to start on boot; I must always start it
>> manuall
On 1/31/11 4:04 PM, Naheem Zaffar wrote:
> There seems to be an SElinux denial for me which stops it from starting
> (I upgraded from Fedora 14 and its NOT a live machine).
>
> I would assume its the same error?
So far, I have not identified an SELinux denial that appears to be
associated with th
igger
this?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 00:03 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 23:57 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > Thanks. Now, how do I get fedpkg to preserve it? I see (when doing
> > "fedpkg mockbuild"):
> >
> > INFO: Cleaning
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 21:54 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 21:33 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > I'm pretty much a novice at both mock and chroot. Where can I find out
> > how to change to the mock build chroot (using fedpkg or otherwise) so
> > that
I'm pretty much a novice at both mock and chroot. Where can I find out
how to change to the mock build chroot (using fedpkg or otherwise) so
that I can debug a failed mock build?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 06:58 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 06/29/2010 06:17 AM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>
> > Updating F13 now works;
>
> Does it?
>
> Not for me.
Sigh... You're right. Some other updates happened and I thought this
one was included. But it
le to fix it with more updates, on a Friday.
>
> Can anybody help me understand the scenario here? Should we start
> filtering out push requests that have more than -2 karma?
Updating F13 now works; but a yum upgrade from F12 still seems busted.
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing l
rors "gio-2.0" ) 2>&5
no
Well, that's... interesting.
If there were disc space issues (as Dan Horák suggests), that could
result in some rather exotic errors.
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 22:43 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 15:46 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > On 5/27/10 2:11 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > > On 27/05/10 17:48, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > >> bugzilla.redhat.com is no longer load
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 15:46 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> On 5/27/10 2:11 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > On 27/05/10 17:48, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> >> bugzilla.redhat.com is no longer loading for me when using Epiphany
> >> 2.30.2. It loads fine in Firefox.
On 5/27/10 2:11 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 27/05/10 17:48, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> bugzilla.redhat.com is no longer loading for me when using Epiphany
>> 2.30.2. It loads fine in Firefox. Is anyone else seeing this?
>>
>
> epiphany-2.30.2-1.fc13.i686 loads
On 5/27/10 3:21 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 12:48 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> bugzilla.redhat.com is no longer loading for me when using Epiphany
>> 2.30.2. It loads fine in Firefox. Is anyone else seeing this?
>>
>
> Probably this bug:
bugzilla.redhat.com is no longer loading for me when using Epiphany
2.30.2. It loads fine in Firefox. Is anyone else seeing this?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2010-04-05 at 13:09 +0200, LinuxDonald wrote:
> Am 05.04.2010 03:11, schrieb Braden McDaniel:
> > On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 17:18 +0200, LinuxDonald wrote:
> >
> >> Am 01.04.2010 23:01, schrieb Braden McDaniel:
> >>
> > [snip]
>
On Sun, 2010-04-04 at 17:18 +0200, LinuxDonald wrote:
> Am 01.04.2010 23:01, schrieb Braden McDaniel:
[snip]
> > It looks like this line in CMakeLists.txt:
> >
> >
> >> SET(libdir "\${exec_prefix}/${LIB_INSTALL_DIR}")
> >>
to this mail.
It looks like this line in CMakeLists.txt:
> SET(libdir "\${exec_prefix}/${LIB_INSTALL_DIR}")
should be
> SET(libdir "${LIB_INSTALL_DIR}")
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
;>
>
> They do.
I was given no such option when performing an upgrade using the F13
Alpha DVD. This option only appeared for the full install.
I seem to recall the same behavior for the F12 DVD.
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ks for the explanation. I've pushed updates to testing with this
change.
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
updates.
> so openvrml is no longer chosen for the
> multilib repo compose. Some packagers fix that with "self-obsoletes".
> In the "openvrml" package:
>
> Obsoletes: openvrml < %{version}-%{release}
>
> That way, openvrml.x86_64 would replace an old/obsolete openvrml.i686,
> if installed.
I can do this; but I don't understand why the existence of
libopenvrml-devel and its "Obsoletes: openvrml-devel" aren't sufficient.
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 20:20 -0800, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> On Saturday 20 February 2010 06:03:28 pm Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > I guess I should properly read the headings... I guess I misunderstood
> > where this was going from your summary.
> >
> > If I understand it
On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 20:46 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-02-21 at 02:15 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Just for kicks, the current
> >
> >Upgrade from 12+updates to 13+updates+testing
> >
> > broken deps look like below. While se
libboost_filesystem-mt.so.5
This doesn't look to me like F12 updates are being factored in properly.
openvrml-0.18.3-10 is currently in F12 updates.
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
causes a huge overlinking adding lots of unneeded direct dependencies to
> rpm packages.
gtk+-2.0.pc has:
Requires: gdk-${target}-2.0 atk cairo gio-2.0 pangoft2
It seems likely that some, if not all, of the latter four belong in
Requires.private.
--
Braden McDaniel
ail away!
rarefied
Vaguely descriptive, rhymes with "rawhide", and there just might be pun
in there somewhere.
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 1/27/10 5:13 PM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> ... looking pretty good. Thanks everybody!
Did it go so well we can do it again?
That is, is there any chance of getting Boost 1.42.0 into F13?
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
led?
> >
> > Normal .pc files go into %{_libdir}/pkgconfig
> > Arch-independent .pc files go into %{_datadir}/pkgconfig
> >
>
> That's helpful, thanks!
And just to be clear, this is not Fedora-specific. You can also find
this in "man pkg-config", where th
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:00 -0500, Mail Lists wrote:
> On 01/30/2010 01:53 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 11:36 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> Braden McDaniel wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:48 +0800, Liu Yu Fei Eric wr
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 11:36 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Braden McDaniel wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 14:48 +0800, Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time.
> >> What about 3.5.7
patching for this to happen.
I don't think it's worth it.
--
Braden McDaniel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
58 matches
Mail list logo
