Re: Empty debugsourcefiles.list

2025-07-30 Thread Brad Smith
In addition, once Go 1.25 is released (guessing mid-August) a rebuild of Go projects will be done, if I understood the discussion on the recent Go SIG call. Brad On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 12:16 PM Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 3:11 PM Łukasz Wojniłowicz > wrote: > >

Moby Engine/Docker CLI Updates Policy Exception

2025-05-28 Thread Brad Smith
Of potential interest to Docker users and developers on Fedora. FESCo has approved an exception to the updates policy for the moby-engine package in Fedora. With this exception, the current release for the moby-engine package will be available across all Fedora releases. The moby-engine package in

Re: How do you use sidetags?

2025-05-17 Thread Brad Smith
Sometime ago I asked a similar question on matrix (or IRC?) Fedora Devel and some very kind person provided the following. I cannot recall who it was. My use case is simple, build Kubernetes or CRI-O using a version of golang in updates-testing but not yet available in stable. I have used these st

CRI-O 1.33 now available

2025-05-16 Thread Brad Smith
The initial release of CRI-O 1.33 (v1.33.0) has been pushed to Fedora rawhide and updates-testing for F42. CRI-O 1.33 is not available in F41 which does not supply the required go 1.24 base line for CRI-O. Brad -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.f

PSA - A change in Docker cli plugin version management (Compose, BuildKit, Buildx)

2025-04-30 Thread Brad Smith
FESCo has approved an update policy exception that encompasses these Docker plugins: Compose, BuildKit, and Buildx (https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3394). The rpms for these plugins will now track the current plugin release across all Fedora releases. The maintainers for all three plugins only suppor

Heads Up - Kubernetes v1.29 EOL

2025-03-03 Thread Brad Smith
Kubernetes v1.29 is EOL along with CRI-O v1.29 and CRI-Tools v1.29. Updates to the kubernetes1.29, cri-o1.29, cri-tools1.29 versioned packages will no longer happen in Fedora (currently in F41, F42, F43). I will mark these rpms as retired for F43 (rawhide) and possibly for F42. Fedora 40 and 41 a

Re: Kubernetes 1.32 Beta 0

2024-11-06 Thread Brad Smith
if kubeadm is used to initialize a cluster. On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 11:24 AM Code Zombie wrote: > > Which binaries first this package include? > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2024, 21:58 Brad Smith wrote: >> >> The rpm for Kubernetes v1.32 (kubernetes1.32) has been pushed into >> r

Kubernetes 1.32 Beta 0

2024-11-06 Thread Brad Smith
The rpm for Kubernetes v1.32 (kubernetes1.32) has been pushed into rawhide with the beta.0 release. This rpm will also be available in F41. Rawhide and F41 also have kubernetes1.31, kubernetes1.30, and kubernetes1.29 rpms. If you test kubernetes1.32 and are upgrading from v1.31 please see this urg

Re: fedpkg failed with : Signature verification failed.

2024-08-16 Thread Brad Smith
You should install the mock-core-config and distribution-gpg-keys rpms for the version of Fedora that is running fedpkg. If I am reading your first post correctly, you are using an F41 vm to run "fedpkg --release f41 mockbuild". distribution-gpg-keys-1.105-1.fc41 should already be in stable accord

Re: fedpkg failed with : Signature verification failed.

2024-08-16 Thread Brad Smith
As shared bt @music on the Fedora build system matrix channel, this happens after a new Fedora release is branched. You can install these two packages to update your system to work correctly. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-4a6de3d12d https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FE

Re: Testing package version is spec file

2024-05-08 Thread Brad Smith
Thanks Adam. Yes there is a new shell script that does the new document generation. I experimented with using the %{exists: ...} macro but could not get it to work. If you have an example at hand I would greatly appreciate it. Best regards On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 10:46 AM Adam Williamson wrote:

Re: Testing package version is spec file

2024-05-08 Thread Brad Smith
Thanks Tom. A good question. Basically upstream supports 3 or 4 versions concurrently so I need to maintain a spec file that works across this version boundary since the older versions will be available in Fedora for another year. Also there are forthcoming changes that make it desirable to have si

Testing package version is spec file

2024-05-08 Thread Brad Smith
I help maintain a package where upstream changed the process to generate installed documentation. In version 1.30 and newer, the spec file needs to use process A; in versions older than 1.30 (e.g. 1.29.x, etc) the spec file needs to use process B. I am struggling to find a workable solution to test

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Versioned Kubernetes Packages (Self-Cont

2024-04-15 Thread Brad Smith
page can be supplemented by email to this list and posts on the Fedora community blog and Discussions. I will be glad to update the proposal to make this more explicit. best regards Brad Smith On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 8:56 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Something that is not dis

Re: mock build for rawhide: Transaction failed: Signature verification failed.

2024-02-20 Thread Brad Smith
I had this problem too. There is a new version of mock and more-core-config (not sure of name still getting first cup of coffee) in updates-testing that has the fix. On Tue, Feb 20, 2024, 04:32 Richard Shaw wrote: > For about a week I've been seeing this when trying to test build packages > for

Heads Up: Changes to Kubernetes RPM structure coming to Rawhide (F40)

2024-01-26 Thread Brad Smith
Early next week I will push Kubernetes v1.29 rpms to rawhide. There are 2 important changes to be aware of. First, this will replace Kubernetes v1.28 in rawhide and therefore in Fedora 40. Future updates for Kubernetes 1.28 will be found in COPR at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/buckaroog

Re: Enabling GOPROXY and GOSUMDB in Fedora

2023-12-20 Thread Brad Smith
Greetings - On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 7:35 AM Maxwell G wrote: > > Can someone clarify what they mean by this? The patch itself [1] makes > it pretty clear what the original values are. When I look at /usr/lib/golang/go.env I see: [bgsmith@pico newversionprep (main *%)]$ more /usr/lib/golan

Re: Enabling GOPROXY and GOSUMDB in Fedora

2023-12-19 Thread Brad Smith
At a minimum, I recommend that the patch include the original values for GOPROXY, GOSUMDB, and GOTOOLCHAIN as comments. This makes it easier to change back to default values. At the moment, one has to visit the relevant web pages. I lean towards providing upstream defaults in this case with update

Re: F40 Change Proposal: SQLAlchemy 2

2023-08-28 Thread Brad Smith
I had the same question. Then I noticed this pinned post in Fedora Discussions: "We are experimenting 2 with using Fedora Discussion as part of the Changes process. Change announcements (like the one you are reading right now) will still be sent to the devel-announce mailing list, but the conversa

Re: RPM packaging help

2023-08-13 Thread Brad Smith
On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 12:40 PM Maxwell G wrote: > > > Please let me know if there is anything that can be done with the > > kubernetes rpms to help. > > The kubernetes rpms are completely separate from the unbundled > golang-k8s-* packages and use bundled dependencies as far as I know. > Thanks

Re: RPM packaging help

2023-08-13 Thread Brad Smith
On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 9:12 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > > > I don't have an ETA on the K8S situation. > Please let me know if there is anything that can be done with the kubernetes rpms to help. Best regards Brad ___ devel mailing list -- devel

Re: Modules without modularity

2023-06-13 Thread Brad Smith
Is this thread on alternatives to alternatives also relevant: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/4AUQVBKLQBU6LIWZGVXN2CM3XTYQAKXZ/#4AUQVBKLQBU6LIWZGVXN2CM3XTYQAKXZ ? Modules provide a mechanism for system level switches between alternative versions a

Re: Going Inactive

2023-04-27 Thread Brad Smith
Thanks Anthony. Nothing else at this time. Contribute at any time. Brad On Thu, Apr 27, 2023, 17:39 Anthony Rabbito wrote: > Thanks Brad! I have done so. If there's any other similar issues feel free > to reach out. > > Anthony > ___ > devel mailing

Re: Going Inactive

2023-04-26 Thread Brad Smith
Hi Anthony Glad to know you are still around. I am sure things will improve with time. If you get a chance could you please move me to the admin group in the kubernetes repo? I have a couple of clean up items to take care of that need admin access. Best regards Brad On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 8:17

Re: Self Introduction: Dalton Hubble

2023-02-28 Thread Brad Smith
reach out. Best Regards Brad Smith On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 9:19 PM Dalton Hubble wrote: > > Hey folks, > > I'm an engineer working in the Go, cloud, and infrastructure space. I've been > a Linux user for a while, a Fedora user for the last ~8 years, and used to > w

Kubernetes and Fedora 36

2023-01-21 Thread Brad Smith
The upstream Kubernetes project released patch updates to all supported versions of Kubernetes (1.23, 1.24, 1.25, 1.26). With these updates all supported versions are now built with go 1.19. Fedora 36 provides go 1.18 and also provides Kubernetes 1.24. As of Kubernetes 1.24.10, updates for Kubern

Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2022-10-11 Thread Brad Smith
I have not used nodejs for development in quite a while so cannot respond from an involved user perspective. Given that context, I concur with Dan's reasoning and choices. On a more meta note, Fedora has at least 3 mechanisms to provide multiple versions of some component for a given release - alt

RPM Guidance Questions

2022-07-10 Thread Brad Smith
Greetings - I am sure this question has been asked and answered many times but I could not find anything that specifically addressed my questions via google search. I have modified a spec file for a python based application (weewx specifically although that is not too relevant) to target Fedora

Re: Self Introduction: Brad Smith (aka buckaroogeek)

2022-01-10 Thread Brad Smith
Thank you Matthew. Brad On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:12 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:42:10AM -0800, Brad Smith wrote: > > I am a retired senior manager for a U.S federal agency (US Forest > > Service). I have a background in software develop

Self Introduction: Brad Smith (aka buckaroogeek)

2022-01-10 Thread Brad Smith
Greetings Peter Hunt (aka haircommander) asked if I might be interested in assisting with the maintenance of the kubernetes packages for Fedora. I have the time and interest and some of the needed skills. I am certainly willing to learn. I am a retired senior manager for a U.S federal agency (US