How to handle ABI breakage in Rawhide

discourages Rawhide testing. Thanks, -- _ // Bernie Innocenti \X/ https://codewiz.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Re: noexec on /dev/shm

On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 00:59 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Well, OK, bad wording on my side. Replace "fixed" by "guessable". What sort of attack would this enable? Wait... any unprivileged process can create sockets in the abstract namespace? Uh-oh. -- //

Re: noexec on /dev/shm

-v @ | grep / | wc -l 73 Most uses are from dbus, but I'm also seeing gnome-session and gvfsd-trash. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Making CAPS LOCK another CTRL key in the console

trol Control Control Control Control (yes, really this redundant :) So, what's the moral equivalent of this in Fedora? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapr

/etc/mtab

t filesystem in read-write mode: [ OK ] mount: according to mtab, /dev/sda1 is already mounted on / Mounting local filesystems: mount: sysfs already mounted or /sys busy mount: according to mtab, /sys is already mounted on /sys [FAILED] Enabling /etc/fstab swaps: [ OK ] -- // Bernie Innocenti

Passing ownership of mingetty

ckage so you can take it over (there doesn't seem a way to do a direct transfer in pkgdb). -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

gethostbyname() and resolv.conf updates

. Is there any chance we could apply the same patch in Fedora too? I don't know all the details, but I guess there might be a good reason why this patch wasn't upstreamed yet. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ -- devel ma

atop 1.25 in Fedora

Hello Kairo, Fedora is still shipping version 1.23 of atop. An updated rpm of atop 1.25 is available from http://atoptool.nl . Gerlof seems to be the packager. Let me know if I could help. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ -- devel

Re: Fedora 13 Release Candidate Phase

I'm not sure if it happens due to some strange setting of mine or with any configuration saved by OpenArena 0.8.1. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorapro

Re: Fedora 13 Release Candidate Phase

is one :-) Perhaps the (web?) UI used by releng could be enhanced to display the current karma next to each push request? Or maybe Bodhi could be configured to automatically cancel stable requests when the karma drops below 0? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs

Re: Fedora 13 Release Candidate Phase

El Thu, 13-05-2010 a las 09:57 -0400, Seth Vidal escribió: > sudo yum install fedora-easy-karma > fedora-easy-karma > > follow the prompts (if any) Works fantastically, thanks! -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ -- devel

Re: Fedora 13 Release Candidate Phase

El Thu, 13-05-2010 a las 09:53 -0400, Bernie Innocenti escribió: > I gave a -1 to this update a few days ago, but it's been ignored: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openarena-0.8.5-1.fc13 > Analyzing the event log in Bodhi exposes where our quality process ulti

Re: Fedora 13 Release Candidate Phase

ld be more closely followed and the process documentation updated if there > are reasons we will take updates for packages other than to fix blockers after > the RC process has started. I think we could take any package at any time, after a sufficient amount of testing has been done o

usb_modeswitch-data missing in F12

package be pushed to the updates repository when its dependencies are not being satisfied? This situation happens quite frequently in Fedora because it's hard for a maintainer to check for dependency problems manually. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http:

usb_modeswitch 1.1.2 in Fedora 11

ou mind if I pushed this update before the Fedora 11 repositories freeze? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel