checking what application requested.
What does this actually do/mean?
(Sorry if it's obvious, it isn't to me!)
--
Benjamin Lewis
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 1/22/13 7:10 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
Ext4 metadata checksums feature was merged into Linux 3.6. Can I use
it out of the box with Fedora kernel or is there some magic switch to
enable it?
Are there any plans to support it in e2fsprogs shippe
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012, inode0 wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
There is really no reason why the election messages couldn't go to all
of FAS, and just have a note explaining that you need cla_done to vote.
There is equally no reason, aside from it being more
a note explaining that you need cla_done to vote.
There is equally no reason, aside from it being more admin work, why you
couldn't have two lists. I just don't see how this is in any way better than
just catching some people who are ineligible to vote...
--
Benjamin Lewis
Returni
e announce list is very low and if
devel-announce, test-announce, etc. is used correctly everything posted should
actually be of interest to
pretty much all of FAS and/or cla_done.
[On a slight, but nice side note, range voting is so much better than
FPTP or AV :-)]
--
Benjamin Lewis
Returning
; check all 10 thousand packages, and I your help with this.
Out of curiosity, how does this affect existing systems which have human
UIDs of 500, 501, etc..?
Do they suddenly become system UIDs or is login.defs left alone then
(and consequently no change happens)?
--
Benjamin Lewis
si
ust go
> on naming? The convention for signatures is to add an extension to the
> name of the tarball the signature is for; that shouldn't be too hard to
> implement, I don't think.
Surely the automated testing tool would need a way of being fed
known-trusted public keys in adva
