Re: GCC 4.6 related common package rebuild failures (was Re: mass rebuild status)

2011-02-09 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
> Here are some common errors. Please try to fix the issues rather than > adding workaround flags like -fpermissive, > -Wno-unused-but-set-variable etc. Benjamin, do you plan to write > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/porting_to.html? This could serve as > partial source for that page. I will absolut

Re: boost 1.46.0

2011-02-04 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
> I'm in the process of test-driving a couple packages locally to make > sure that the new boost works. If that turns out well, I'll do a > non-scratch build of boost-1.46.0-0.beta1 later today. Sounds great. Probably better if this gets kicked off earlier in the weekend. > [1] http://fedorap

Re: Putting cross compilers into Fedora

2010-09-01 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
> For cross gcc I guess the important question is, do we want > gcc-4*.src.rpm to build all the cross compilers (and, is C enough, or > do we need C++ too?), or do we have one cross-gcc-4*.src.rpm that > semi-loosely tracks gcc-4*.src.rpm and builds all the cross compilers > (BuildRequires all the

Re: Fedora 14 Alpha RC Compose is At Risk

2010-08-03 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
> 619947 :: MODIFIED :: gnote :: Rahul Sundaram :: gnote needs to be > rebuilt against Boost 1.44 in F14 and devel :: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619947 This was rebuilt: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=187183 -benjamin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.

Re: f14 boost-1.44.0 upgrade: notice of intent

2010-07-27 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
> Do you have a list of packages which will need to be rebuilt? This is > the last day before we branch, and with the dist-git outage there will > be a short time to fix things before the Alpha freeze. Is anything in > the critpath dependent upon boost, or in the primary spins? here's the old l

f14 boost-1.44.0 upgrade: pushed

2010-07-27 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
The boost maintainers have updated the boost package to the current release (1.44.0) in rawhide for F14. More info here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F14Boost144 Rebuilds for devel packages that require boost are mandatory, as SONAME was bumped. Help from package maintainers with rebu

f14 boost-1.44.0 upgrade: notice of intent

2010-07-26 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
Hey. The boost maintainers are planning to update the boost versions to the current release (1.44.0) in rawhide for F14. This is in keeping with the general plan to sync with boost every six months or so. See more detail here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F14Boost144 Suggested plan

boost update status

2010-01-27 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
... looking pretty good. Thanks everybody! Some deps still need to be rebuilt (qpid). Here are some details from somewhat current rawhide reports cross indexed with koji: > easystroke > boost serialization error actiondb.cc:393: instantiated from here /usr/include/boost/archive/shared_p

f13 boost-1.41.0 upgrade: pushed

2010-01-15 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
The boost maintainers have updated the boost package to the current release (1.41.0) in rawhide for F13. More info here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F13Boost141 Rebuilds for devel packages that require boost are mandatory, as SONAME was bumped. Help from package maintainers with rebu

f13 boost-1.41.0 upgrade: notice of intent

2010-01-14 Thread Benjamin Kosnik
Hey. The boost maintainers are planning to update the boost versions to the current release (1.41.0) in rawhide for F13. See more detail here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F13Boost141#Detailed_Description Suggested plan is to push this to devel in the next 24 hrs, which will be ann