Re: pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

2024-11-21 Thread Arthur Bols via devel
On 21/11/2024 13:06, Davide Caratti wrote: yes. The problem is in md4_vector() [1], the legacy provider has a non-NULL pointer and EVP_md4() fetches correctly. However, when pkcs11-provider is installed, EVP_DigestInit_ex() fails. I tried this patch [2] on upstream wpa_supplicant, and it seem to

pkcs11-provider update breaks eduroam

2024-11-19 Thread Arthur Bols via devel
Hi all, A few days ago pkcs11-provider-0.5-3.fc41 update was pushed to Fedora 41. Unfortunately, this update breaks eduroam and possibly many other WPA2-Enterprise wifi networks. There are multiple threads on Fedora Discussion, mainly [0], and a bug report [1]. I understand that the maintain

Re: Orphaning eza (rust-eza - maintained fork of exa)

2024-11-05 Thread Arthur Bols via devel
On 05/11/2024 21:39, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 9:33 PM Arthur Bols wrote: Hi Fabio, On 31/10/2024 19:38, Fabio Valentini wrote: Hi all, TL;DR: I am planning to orphan rust-eza later today. Be warned - it's a lot of work to keep up with upstream (~1 release per week), keepi

Re: Orphaning eza (rust-eza - maintained fork of exa)

2024-11-05 Thread Arthur Bols via devel
Hi Fabio, On 31/10/2024 19:38, Fabio Valentini wrote: Hi all, TL;DR: I am planning to orphan rust-eza later today. Be warned - it's a lot of work to keep up with upstream (~1 release per week), keeping it up-to-date in epel8 is a bit painful (because RHEL 8, duh), and there are license shenanig

Re: FedoraWorkstation default firewall rules unsafe

2024-07-29 Thread Arthur Bols via devel
On 28/07/2024 23:11, Samuel Sieb wrote: MDNS works by default.  Users don't need to open the port. It seems you are correct, due to the fact that ports 1025-65535 are open by default. I must've changed to the default zone to home for my network when I tried this years ago. Thanks for the corr

Re: FedoraWorkstation default firewall rules unsafe

2024-07-28 Thread Arthur Bols via devel
On 28/07/2024 13:20, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, Jul 28 2024 at 11:37:15 AM +02:00:00, Arthur Bols via devel wrote: Aside that this does not contribute to the discussion at all, I believe it is reasonable to assume that the default firewall rules are strict enough to not open all ports

Re: FedoraWorkstation default firewall rules unsafe

2024-07-28 Thread Arthur Bols via devel
On 28/07/2024 11:33, Adam Williamson wrote: On Sun, 2024-07-28 at 10:25 +0200, Arthur Bols via devel wrote: Hi all, Yesterday, while assisting a user with connecting a printer, I noticed that the default firewall zone on Fedora Workstation is set to "FedoraWorkstation". This zone

Re: FedoraWorkstation default firewall rules unsafe

2024-07-28 Thread Arthur Bols via devel
On 28/07/2024 11:20, Björn Persson wrote: Arthur Bols via devel wrote: I often run dev servers that I assume are secure due to the default firewall settings This practice of blindly assuming that somebody else is protecting you from your own negligence is a common source of security breaches

FedoraWorkstation default firewall rules unsafe

2024-07-28 Thread Arthur Bols via devel
Hi all, Yesterday, while assisting a user with connecting a printer, I noticed that the default firewall zone on Fedora Workstation is set to "FedoraWorkstation". This zone has ports 1025-65535 open by default [0].  Is there a historical reason for this, just an oversight, or am I missing som