Re: Seeking co-maintainer for libffi package

Thank you for all of the offers. The team that maintains glibc (Carlos, Florian and DJ) has stepped up to help with libffi packaging. I think that this is the right group to handle libffi for now. Thanks again, AG On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 10:56 AM Anthony Green wrote: > > Hello -- I

Seeking co-maintainer for libffi package

me available to create the requisite compat packages, monitor all of the rebuilds, etc. It would be best if this person had some Fedora packaging experience under their belt, given some of the complexities involved and the criticality of libffi to the whole platform. Thanks! AG -- Anthon

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for libffi maintainer

s://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873990 > > > The non-rsponsive maintainer check BZ is: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806314 > > Thanks, > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > IRC

Re: Upgrading libffi

ll process. Known problem? * ecl fail to build, but it requires code changes. But I am also an admin on that package and fix it myself. The upstream ecl is already fixed. AG -- Anthony Green Senior Principal Solutions Architect, Financial Servic

Re: Upgrading libffi

Anthony Green writes: > Kevin Fenzi writes: >> I suppose you could also >> add both old and new libffi source to the libffi package and build them >> both (old to compat), rebuild in side tag and drop the old >> sources/compat. >> Does that make sense? >

Re: Upgrading libffi

s for the tip! AG -- Anthony Green ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

Re: Upgrading libffi

ABI version. This needed to be done anyway due to ABI breakage in the AArch64 port (see 12cf89ee and the corresponding GCC PR70024). AG -- Anthony Green ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to de

Re: Upgrading libffi

m releng or other folks > around here to help get it done. Could somebody please walk me through the first few steps? Maybe start by explaining side tags? AG -- Anthony Green ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: Upgrading libffi

rebuild all of the dependent packages before deleting the compat package. I just don't have time to do this and am looking for help. AG -- Anthony Green ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Upgrading libffi

est path forward. Thanks! AG -- Anthony Green ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of

Re: fuse-encfs orphaned

Check out this audit... https://defuse.ca/audits/encfs.htm ecryptfs is the closest alternative, it seems. AG - Original Message - From: "Jos de Kloe" To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2014 4:10:56 AM Subject: Re: fuse-encfs orphaned On 05/15/2014

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Anthony Green

Hi Miroslav, Sorry - I've been out for a while. I've just approved your requests. Thanks, Anthony Green - Original Message - From: "Miroslav Lichvar" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: gr...@redhat.com Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 11:19:36 AM Sub

Orphaning kawa package

I don't have the time to maintain the kawa scheme package. I hope somebody can pick it up. In the meantime, I am orphaning it. Thanks, AG -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Coordinating libffi upgrade

t into the F19 release. Among other things, this include AArch64 support. Anthony Green -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Coordinating libffi upgrade

will include additional ports like Aarch64, which is likely of interest to some Fedora developers. How do we coordinate a rebuild for dependent packages? Also, I assume this will have to wait 'til F18 is out (fine by me), but I'd like to deal with it early in the F19 cycle. Thanks,

cmucl Was: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Retiring packages for Fedora 18

I see no reason to keep cmucl in the distro given where sbcl is these days. Any objections to dropping it completely? AG - Original Message - From: "Bill Nottingham" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: tr...@df.lth.se, "radoslaw lisowski" , michel+...@sylvestre.me, gr...@redhat.com

Releasing ownership of many audio packages (and a little more)

from the Apache Web Services Project zynaddsubfx -- Real-time software synthesizer Anthony Green -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: disruptive libffi upgrade

Sorry folks -- thanks for untagging. I'll ping the list again after May 9, as was suggested earlier in this thread. AG - Original Message - From: "Kevin Fenzi" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, "Anthony Green" Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 8:05:33 PM I'

disruptive libffi upgrade

Hello, I recently release libffi 3.0.11, and ABI changes are mandating a .so number change. Despite the ABI change, I suspect that simple rebuilds are all that will be required for dependent packages. The ABI changes are simply: 1. Some internal debugging functions that should never h