Re: Conflicting build-ids in nekovm and haxe

2023-05-02 Thread Andy Li
Sorry for the late reply. I just got back to this issue. > In general this (should) only happen if the binaries are really > identical (e.g. when one of the packages build requires the other, but > instead of linking/rebuilding some sources it simply copies a binary > directly). > > The build-id

Re: OCaml 4.12

2021-03-04 Thread Andy Li
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 1:15 AM Jerry James wrote: > Once that is fixed, haxe should build in Rawhide again. Also, Andy, > I'd like to point out that ocaml-luv is now available in Fedora, so it > should be possible to update to haxe 4.2.x. Regards, I've just fixed it by upgrading haxe to 4.2.1.

Re: OCaml PPX updates

2020-12-07 Thread Andy Li
Hi Jerry, On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, 07:38 Jerry James, wrote: > Hi all, > > I've BCCed the maintainers of the following packages to see if they > are okay with this: > - ocaml-migrate-parsetree (update to 1.8.0) > - ocaml-sedlex (update to 2.2) > I'm fine with this. Thanks for taking care of the upda

Conflicting build-ids in nekovm and haxe

2020-11-12 Thread Andy Li
Hi list, Re. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896901 Since haxe-4.1.3-4 and nekovm-2.3.0-4, both nekovm and haxe packages contains "/usr/lib/.build-id/b0/aed4ddf2d45372bcc79d5e95d2834f5045c09c". The nekovm one is a symlink to "/usr/bin/neko". The haxe one to "/usr/bin/haxelib". Both