Hi,
meld directory compare in f36 is broken.
I opened a bug report last month:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091377
Some days later, kiilerix provided a PR to fix this issue:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/meld/pull-request/6
The PR has been accepted but a new package hasn
>
> The issue here is that there's not a way to describe the SRPM license
> separate from the binary RPM license. So that information is important
> for SRPM distribution.
>
But Licensing Guidelines make clear that the License: field refers to the
binary packages not source ones.
BR,
Andrea
I believe this patch is not correct.
"The License: field refers to the licenses of the contents of the *binary*
rpm."
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/
In the README file there is writted: "cdparanoia (the command line tool) is
released under the GPLv2
gcompris-qt changed license from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3 in version 1.1 because
they used a library for analog electricity activity under AGPLv3 causing
the whole software to be licensed under it.
Regards,
Andrea
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapro
Hi!
On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 1:15 PM Helg Green via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> The program is installed in the folder
> /opt/simplest_studio/bin/simplest_studio
>
> A strange error also appeared:
> .
> .
> .
> RPM build errors:
> Empty %files file
> /home/helg/rpmbuild/BUIL
Il lun 17 ago 2020, 19:55 Jeff Law ha scritto:
> On Fri, 2020-08-14 at 12:03 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >I tried to update pinta to the latest upstream version. It built fine
> except than on f33/armv7hl:
> >
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject
Hi guys,
I tried to update pinta to the latest upstream version. It built fine
except than on f33/armv7hl:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1530/49241530/build.log
I have no idea why. Can someone please help?
Thanks!
Andrea
___
devel
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 11:28 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I submitted another build. It failed with the same error:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48924234
>
> There was some upstream to us work in the iad2 datacenter today:
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 5:46 PM José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Saturday, 8 August 2020 16.26.39 WEST Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>
> > Can someone please check?
>
> >
>
> > Thanks!
>
> >
>
> > Andrea
>
>
>
> When that happens I issue another
Hi guys,
I was updating gcompris-qt for the newer cmake but I got this error on
the s390x builder:
GenericError: Downloaded rpm
http://kojipkgs-cache01.s390.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/4182/48924182/gcompris-qt-0.97-6.fc33.src.rpm
is corrupted:
rpm's header can't be extracted:
/var/tmp/koji/ta
Hi guys,
at least one of the packages I maintain was also affected. Fedora
Release Engineering has opened a bug against the package for this issue.
Can you please avoid that? Moreover, would my package be orphaned in 8
weeks because it cannot be built for a builder issue on s390x?
https://bugz
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 6:26 PM Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> there are plenty of Python packages in Fedora currently using setuptools at
> buildtime but not all of them are BuildRequiring it explicitly. This only
> works
> because python3-devel (transitively) depends on python3-set
Hi guys,
can someone please tell me what's going on?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b55ed79892
Thanks!
Andrea
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproje
HI!
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 4:25 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
> here is a list of packages that (transitively, at build or run time)
> require
> Python 2 and have not yet got a FESCo exception to do so.
> If you were bcced on this e-mail, it affects one or more of your packages.
>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 4:40 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 11:37:28AM +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > recently it has been opened a bug against pinta:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755274
> >
> > It seems
Hi all,
recently it has been opened a bug against pinta:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755274
It seems that for some unknown reason, in F31, the build process is no
longer able to determine mono dependencies correctly.
Do someone have some hint for this?
Thanks!
Andrea
_
Hi!
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 6:02 PM, Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
> I've Searched for bugs at our ArchLinux fellows and they mentioned this:
>
> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/57542?project=0&order=id&sort=desc&status
> %5B0%5D=closed&string=gcompris-qt
>
> It seems caused by this change:
> http
Hi!
I'm forwarding this request for help here since it seems there is no
one available on Fedora games.
The strange thing about this issue is that on F27 everything is fine (the
spec file is the same).
Thanks in advance,
Andrea
-- Forwarded message --
From: A
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 2:46 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> As of Fedora 28, the 'info' package has gained a file trigger
> (%transfiletrigger) which will automatically rebuild the info directory
> node when any file is installed into %_infodir. Thus it is no longer
> necessary for packa
Hi
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc
> and
> gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed d
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:45 AM, David Demelier
wrote:
> Is there a place where you see that we must use this variable?
>
> Anyway, it worked, I changed the CMake invocation to:
>
> cmake ... \
> -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" \
> -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}" \
>
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 9:12 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> At the moment the appstream-builder requires a 48x48px application
> icon[1] to be included in the AppStream metadata. I'm sure it's no
> surprise that 48x48 padded to 64x64 and then interpolated up to
> 128x128 (for HiDPI s
Hi Volerk,
Hello Andrea!
>
> Please add it to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GIS
>
Added!!
Bye,
Andrea
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Andrea,
>
> I've taken it, but my ISP is giving me some trouble at the moment,
> they said they'll get things sorted out within the hour.
>
> I don't have a package ready for review yet, but I t
Hi!
I'm looking for a reviewer for
osmctools - Tools to manipulate OpenStreetMap files:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1464777
Maybe some other OSM mapper is interested?
I'm happy to exchange reviews.
Thanks in advance.
Bye,
Andrea
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 11:11 PM, rugk wrote:
> FYI, the game's name I could not remember was "Which way is up". See
> https://packages.debian.org/stretch/whichwayisup.
>
Nice game. I didn't know it.
I packaged it and it's available for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=146477
Hi Nemanja,
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Nemanja Milosevic <
nmilo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to request admin access to the package Onboard. Onboard is an
> onscreen keyboard which I am using on my BayTrail tablet and it works
> really well.
>
> The package
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Ron Olson wrote:
> Aloha all-
>
> I’m Ron Olson, with the nickname tachoknight. I have been using Unix since
> 1989 and Linux since about 1992, when we somehow got an early version to run
> on a Gateway2000 machine.
Welcome!
> I have submitted for review an updat
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
> wrote:
>>
>> Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
>>
>> -
>>
>> The Filesystem Layout section
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III
wrote:
> Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines.
>
> -
>
> The Filesystem Layout section of the guidelines was simplified and
> outdated information was removed.
>
> * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
>
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 05/04/2016 05:20 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> > Does this mean that most console emulators (i.e.
> > NES/SNES/MasterSystem/Genesis emulators) are now acceptable in Fedora?
>
> Subject to the guidelines as writ
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
> Some emulators (applications which emulate another platform) are not
> permitted for inclusion in Fedora. These rules will help you determine
> whether an emulator is acceptable for Fedora.
>
> * Emulators which depend on firmware or ROM files
Hi all,
I am Tecnoballz maintainer.
Currently Tecnoballz is failing to build in rawhide:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308179
There is a new upstream version (0.93.1) and it builds without problems. I
also added Debian/upstream patches.
In order to allow a shared scoreboard fi
On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Nov 2014 16:48:03 +0100
> Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>
> > I could build for F20 (I think a lucky strike) but I couldn't for
> > rawhide. This is the task:
> >
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > > seems it's the mono compiler process that gets stuck, now to find
> > > out why ...
> > >
> >
> > Would it help if I open a bug for this issue?
>
> Probibly, but not sure where makes the most sense. ;(
>
> Can you try another build no
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:45:43 +0100
> Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Christopher Meng
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane
> > > wrote:
&g
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009403
>
> Hi,
>
> Please try again with "make" directly instead of "make %{?_smp_mflags}&q
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> the builders have 3.16.3-200.fc20.x86_64, could you retry the local
> mock rebuild with this kernel installed? I know it won't solve the
> problem, but might lead to having a reproducer. Eventually also with
> the same mock config as used for the
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> hm, it's not the first case where Mono enters a deadlock or endless
> loop ...
>
> What is your host system and what is the kernel version?
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
$ uname -r
3.16.6-200.fc20.x86_64
Bye,
Andrea
--
Hi,
I'm trying to build pinta but it fails due to timeout on F20 and F22:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009403
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009471
It built fine for F19 and F21 though. And it builds fine using mock. I
resubmitted the two failed builds
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky
> > If it helps, if it makes things easier, I can release the ownership of
> > metadata-extractor and someone else can have good care. I just
> > packaged it because, as an openstreetmap mapper, I longed to have JOSM
> > in Fedora
>
> Librarie
I send again the following post. I can't believe not to get an opinion :)
Bye,
Andrea.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> Hi all,
> last April the following bug report was opened:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947457
>
> As
Hi all,
last April the following bug report was opened:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947457
As I stated on bugzilla, metadata-extractor was just needed by JOSM.
Updating metadata-extractor would break JOSM. Anyway I suggested to
patch JOSM to use a newer version of metadata-extr
Hi Richard,
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Hi all. I'm the developer for PackageKit and gnome-software, the
> latter being the new software center we're hopefully including as a
> technical preview in Fedora 20.
>
> [...]
>
> At the moment, we use the information in the
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Any know of a way to build a customized search into firefox. Basically I want
> to setup a search pull down which is hard coded to a particular site.
Probably this is what you want:
http://www.opensearch.org/Home
Bye,
andrea.
--
devel m
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Mario Ceresa wrote:
> I deeply admire Lee's perseverance! My oldest was 3 years and I felt
> trapped in the "Neverending Story" :)
>
> Out of curiosity, could you post a link to the oldest one?
It seems this one is even older:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> * 3rd attempt:
>> Same as options as the 2nd attempt but this time I chose to enable
>> only the F17 remote repositories and I disabled the "Install repo" so
>> I presume all the packages were downloaded from the net. At about 85%
>> of ins
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> yum groupinstall "GNOME Desktop Environment"
>
> This alone unfortunately doesn't do the trick. You will probably have to
>
> yum groupinstall "X Window System"
>
> as well as some drivers for your graphic card to get it working.
>
> I als
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Basically the same kind of failure as the last several times I did updates.
>> This time f16->f17. Used preupgrade.
>
> I'd like to share with you m
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Basically the same kind of failure as the last several times I did updates.
> This time f16->f17. Used preupgrade.
I'd like to share with you my experience about installing Fedora
17/x86_64. It is a real PITA. No doubts about it.
* 1st atte
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>> There still seems to be problems. I rebuilt it locally with an updated
>> F16 and now I get:
>> $ rpm -qp --requires
>> /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tecn
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> On 02/11/2012 02:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>> a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544
>>
>> After closer
Hi all,
a reporter just submitted this bug against tecnoballz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789544
After closer inspection, I see that the RPM doesn't require the needed
libraries:
$ rpm -q --requires tecnoballz
/bin/sh
/bin/sh
config(tecnoballz) = 0.92-11.fc16
hicolor-icon-the
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Mathieu Bridon
wrote:
> Did you forget to commit/push that patch? :)
It seems so (blush)
Thanks,
Andrea.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi all,
I continue getting the following error while trying to build
tecnoballz for F16 & F15: "BuildError: No srpms found in
/var/lib/mock/f16-build-1198748-191373/root/tmp/scmroot/tecnoballz".
Example build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3577090
I really wonder what's g
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:29 PM, P J P wrote:
> I'm trying to package the PDFCrack tool for Fedora,
> Somehow it is creating an empty DebugInfo package.
>
> Could someone tell why it is creating an empty debuginfo package?
Because it executes "strip pdfcrack" :)
Bye,
Andrea.
--
devel mailing l
2011/6/3 Björn Persson :
> There's no reason why Debian's Popcon couldn't be ported to Fedora, but Popcon
> is something that users enable voluntarily (and it must be, because if it were
> on by default it would be spyware), so it counts only those users who want to
> be counted which may skew the
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 10:26 +0200, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I just installed F15 over my old F14 (I just kept /home). I tried
>> installing my printer (HP Deskjet 5740) and I failed miserably.
>
Hi all,
I just installed F15 over my old F14 (I just kept /home). I tried
installing my printer (HP Deskjet 5740) and I failed miserably.
First, accessing the printer panel from the system settings was
useless. No printer could be detected.
Then, I tried to run hp-setup from a root terminal.
Hi all,
I'm orphaning genesis (a Graphical frontend to SyncEvolution).
Latest upstream release changed focus and now it is on quick access to
basic sync operations, leaving configuration tasks and fine-grained
control to syncevolution-gtk.
Moreover, IMHO it is too strictly linked to Ubuntu d
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/24/2010 12:45 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On 10/5/10 3:27 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> Here is a list of the current known potentially bad builds and what
>> action could be or has been taken:
>>
>> wildmidi - my rebuil
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> I'll take it.
> Here is my review request:
>
> erlang-rpm-macros - Macros for simplifying building of Erlang packages
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652544
Perfect. Thanks!
Andrea.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorap
Hi packagers,
I've a re-review request for hatari:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=62
Would anyone want to swap one of their review tickets for this?
Regards,
Andrea.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi all,
I've read some months late the following announcement regarding genesis:
https://launchpad.net/genesis-sync/+announcement/5958
Genesis is now strictly linked to Ubuntu development deprecating the
system tray altogether and encouraging the use of application
indicators. Moreover the foc
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Thomas Janssen
wrote:
> File a ticket with FESCo. We should have "*all* packages go trough
> updates-testing, regardless of who's the maintainer or what's the
> reason of an update". If FESCo finds out that this is a bug (some
> packages can be pushed to stable dir
Hi all,
If I try to update F12 I get the following error:
# yum update
Plugin abilitati:presto, refresh-packagekit
Impostazione processo di aggiornamento
Risoluzione dipendenze
--> Esecuzione del controllo di transazione
---> Pacchetto firefox.x86_64 0:3.5.12-1.fc12 settato per essere aggiorna
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Dominic Hopf wrote:
>> I just yesterday had similar problems and then found out my
>> ~/.fedora.cert was out of date since five days ago. Maybe it's the same
>> for you, did yo
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Dominic Hopf wrote:
> I just yesterday had similar problems and then found out my
> ~/.fedora.cert was out of date since five days ago. Maybe it's the same
> for you, did you already had a look there? :)
Yes. It will be valid until Dec 7, 2010.
Bye,
Andrea.
--
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> OK. I deleted the current repo and started again. I do have
> fedora-packager 0.5.1.
>
> Now fedora-packager crashes when uploading new sources.
>
> $ fedpkg clone zaz
> Cloning into zaz...
> [..]
> Resolving
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 07/31/2010 03:19 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>> l return(int(fedoras[-1].strip('f')) + 1)
>> IndexError: list index out of range
>>
>> Help is really appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks!
Hi all,
I do not know anything about GIT and I tried to follow this thread
and the Using_Fedora_GIT in the wiki to make my first commit
The workflow was more or less the following:
$ fedpkg clone zaz
$ cd zaz/
$ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2 .
$ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/zaz.spec .
$
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
> You can open a RFE report against this package in bugzilla for review.
Can you point me to an example?
> For internal libs, if those libs are not libs from other project, you
> can simply use %cmake -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=OFF to avoid
> gener
2010/6/19 Alexander Boström :
> lör 2010-06-19 klockan 19:32 +0200 skrev Andrea Musuruane:
>
>> I do not know how should I threat those internal libraries. How should
>> I package them? Because upstream uses static libraries the dynamic
>> versions cmake creates are
Hi all,
a new version of Hatari has recently been released:
http://hatari.berlios.de/
The new version drops the old build system based on autotools and now
it only support cmake. An (optional) python GUI is now bundled with
the emulator. Moreover some static libraries have been introduced and
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Dne 9.5.2010 06:53, Chen Lei napsal(a):
>> For them, we can simply:
>> 1. Simply orphan those application from repos which have dead upstream
>> for a long time. Normally, those allipcations have better alternatives
>> using GTK+ 2.x, we don't ne
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
> @Alexander: no, I'm not a Fedora packager, but I did some really little
> things.
If you are not a Fedora packager you cannot get the ownership of
orphaned packages.
Read the following document on how to become a packager:
https://fedoraproj
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> I spoke with upstream using IM and he told me that the program is GPL. I
> could package the git snapshot alternatively.
They should make a new release with the correct license. Isn't it possible?
Bye,
Andrea.
--
devel mailing list
deve
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Alain Portal wrote:
> As I show you in my previous message with the "cat" command, these
> (sub)categories exits in each desktop file in F-12, but there isn't subsequent
> submenu, as there are in FC-6
Alain, please, as I already told you, try adding games-menus a
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Alain Portal wrote:
> What I wanted to point is, as an example, my Utility menu is really too full!
> There are 29 applications entries in it, this is unreadable.
>
> On FC6, my Utility menu have 7 submenus:
> - Accessibility
> - Office
> - Text editors
> - Files
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Alain Portal wrote:
> I'm sorry, I forgot to answer this :-(
> And I see that perhaps, I wasn't very clear in my question.
> I'm talking about the Categories entry.
>
> I could see in some desktop files provided by applications that some
> distributions (Mandriva,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Alain Portal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to improve the desktop file of a package I maintain, I should want to
> know if there is a guideline for desktop file in Fedora.
> google donẗ help me.
> And Fedora 6 (KDE related) provided more sub-menu items than F-12...
Th
81 matches
Mail list logo
