n to more ideas!
Adrian Edwards
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Gu
Hello Fedora devel mailing list,
My name is Adrian and i'm a CS student at RIT who is minoring in Free and Open
Source Software. I wanted to send this out briefly to introduce myself.
I'll be working as a Fedora Community Architect Intern during my time with Red
Hat in Boston (US/
few hours of
new content. For most things this is an acceptable compromise.
For your situation it is indeed not helpful. Currently we are including
older checksums in the metalink for three days. This number could be
reduced to maybe two.
Another approach would be if DNF could be told to ignore '
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:56:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 05:40:31PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > > If there are bugs on the compiler side, please let me know immediately,
> > > so that those bugs can be fixed before the mass rebuild next week.
criu/pie/restorer-blob.h] Error 255
make[1]: *** [criu/Makefile:59: pie] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:250: criu] Error 2
Not sure why there is 'strlen()' pulled in with GCC 12. Any ideas?
Adrian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@list
On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 09:38:00PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/11/07 7:25:
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > > Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf
> > > 3.19.0 was released
On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 02:02:11AM +0100, allan2016--- via devel wrote:
> På Sat, 30 Oct 2021 17:59:15 +0200
> Adrian Reber skrev:
> > Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf
> > 3.19.0 was released and a request to update to that version was ma
On Sat, Oct 30, 2021 at 05:59:15PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> Just after the protobuf update to 3.18.1 last week finished protobuf
> 3.19.0 was released and a request to update to that version was made.
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/protobuf/pull-request/7
>
> A
g as you have packages in your
rebuild list I also have in my protobuf 3.19.0 rebuild list.
Adrian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedor
ull-request/8
So maybe mysql-connector-java can be rebuild again once the above PR has
been merged.
Adrian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapro
to rebuild all dependencies again.
So in about one week I will start the rebuild of all protobuf
dependencies in rawhide.
I made all builds in copr
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/adrian/protobuf-3-19/packages/
and it seems all packages that were rebuilt for 3.18.1 are also
rebuildi
)
* mysql-connector-java (protobuf-java subpackage has been removed)
* postgres-decoderbufs (dependency resolution error)
Non of the build failures seem protobuf related as far as I can tell.
Adrian
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 04:55:16PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> Resending w
oarch conflicts with
> > > protobuf-compiler > 3.14.0 provided by
> > > protobuf-compiler-3.18.1-1.fc36.x86_64
>
> I've dropped the java bindings from osmpbf which should fix this.
Thanks for the quick fix. osmpbf has been successfully rebuilt in m
Resending with correct maintainers aliases (-owner does not work anymore)
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 02:45:51PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
>
> The protobuf maintainers prepared an update to protobuf 3.18.1 in
> rawhide. protobuf comes, as always, with a new SO name and requires
> a re
3.fc36.x86_64 conflicts with
libpq-devel provided by libpq-devel-13.4-2.fc36.x86_64
- cannot install the best candidate for the job
Besides these 13 errors I will rebuild everything else in a side tag
starting in one week with the rebuilds.
Current rebuild results are available at:
h
e processes from one host to
another. It can be also triggered from runc when migrating containers.
As far as I know userfaultfd based container migration is not exposed in
any container engine above the level of runc.
Adrian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
decs.fedoraproject.org/openh264/34/x86_64/os/repodata/
You probably have an outdated repository definition in /etc/yum.repos.d.
Your /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-cisco-openh264.repo should have following
line:
metalink=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-cisco-openh264-$releaseve
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 08:16:48PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/01/14 21:48:
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:18:37AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.14. It requires a rebuild
> > > of all
With the upcoming mass rebuild I created a request to have it merged
just now:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3229c37a83
Adrian
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 12:15:44PM +0100, Petr Menšík wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> I would like to rebuild new BIND 9.16,
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:15:11AM +0100, Dan Čermák wrote:
> Adrian Reber writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:18:37AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> >> I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.14. It requires a rebuild
> >> of all dependencies and of the 54
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:18:37AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.14. It requires a rebuild
> of all dependencies and of the 54 dependencies currently only 3 fail to
> rebuild in COPR:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/adria
I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.14. It requires a rebuild
of all dependencies and of the 54 dependencies currently only 3 fail to
rebuild in COPR:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/adrian/protobuf-3-14/packages/
paraview: timeout after 10 hours, should work in koji
community
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:26:00PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:23:40AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > I will do a protobuf update in rawhide which comes, as always, with a
> > new SO version.
> >
> > Before starting the builds in rawhide I wi
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:23:40AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> I will do a protobuf update in rawhide which comes, as always, with a
> new SO version.
>
> Before starting the builds in rawhide I will try it out first in COPR
> and once that is done I will do the builds in rawhid
.
Adrian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 08:34:03AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-15 at 06:51 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a rebuild
> > of all dependencies and of the 55 dependencies currently 10 fail to
> > r
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:17:10PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-06-22 at 10:51 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:51:32AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > > I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a
> > > rebuild
&g
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 04:19:33PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 5:51 PM Adrian Reber wrote:
> > mozc:
> >
> > /builddir/build/BUILD/mozc-2.23.2815.102/dictionary/user_dictionary_storage.h:77:7:
> > error: cannot derive from ‘final’ base
t; > clementine
> > closure-compiler
> > fawkes
> > gazebo
> > hidviz
> > kismet
> > libgadu
> > mir
> > mozc
> > pokerth
> >
> > and the failures do not seem to be protobuf related. See
> >
> > https://copr.fedorainfra
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 06:51:32AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.12. It requires a rebuild
> of all dependencies and of the 55 dependencies currently 10 fail to
> rebuild. The following packages are failing:
>
> clementine
> closure
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 09:11:33PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On Monday, 15 June 2020 06:51:32 CEST Adrian Reber wrote:
> > The following packages are failing:
> >
> > clementine
>
> I rebuild the dep which was causing issue with cleme
to be protobuf related. See
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/adrian/protobuf-3-12/
I requested a side-tag to do the rebuilds.
Adrian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 09:27:56AM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:
> I will update libcdio to 2.1.0 next week in rawhide. As always, libcdio
> comes with a new SO version.
>
> The following packages have to be rebuilt and I will do the necessary
> rebuilds:
>
> cantata
> cdw
&
pcsxr
pragha
python-pycdio
qmmp
strawberry
tellico
whipper
xmms2
Adrian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 08:30:39PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/18/19 8:35 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 07:36:25AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:26:16PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > > On 12/1/1
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 07:36:25AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:26:16PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 12/1/19 10:48 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > > I prepared a protobuf upgrade from 3.6 to 3.11 in rawhide. It comes with
> > > a son
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:26:16PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/1/19 10:48 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > I prepared a protobuf upgrade from 3.6 to 3.11 in rawhide. It comes with
> > a soname update and requires its dependencies to be rebuilt.
> >
> > I tested it
t compose.
Please let me know if you want to rebuild your package yourself or if
you see other problems with the protobuf upgrade.
Adrian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
Fusion for Fedora 31 - Free - Source
> 267 kB/s | 80 kB 00:00
> Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmfusion-free-source'
> Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'rpmf
not found in
> metalink.
> Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing-modular'
> Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'updates-testing-modular'
This (broken updates-testing-modular-f31) should be fixed in the
MirrorManager database now and
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 01:18:09PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 8/19/19 1:13 PM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:59:49AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:
> >>> There is no f31 repo yet
> >>> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development
n to rawhide.
>
> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-$releasever&arch=$basearch
For convenience there are repository redirects from n+1 to rawhide. I
had to remove them manually and in a few hours mirrormanager should
point to the correct repositories. If not, please open
ersions. The regex to detect new versions, detects
new versions and it should not.
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/risc-v/repo/fedora/rawhide/
Adrian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
customized)
Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US
I just orphaned jabberd on all branches as I just stopped my last
instance of jabberd and upstream seems to have stopped development.
Adrian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le
hich sometimes contains
'tree/' in the path and sometimes it does not confuses the part of
MirrorManager which tries to detect repositories. Should be fixed soon.
Adrian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi! I was wondering what would be the best place to ask help about
problems building packages on copr...
Thank you and sorry for off-topic,
Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 10:25:56PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> libcdio upstream released the 2.0 version a few weeks ago and I will
> updated rawhide to the latest libcdio version. It comes with a new
> soname and I will also rebuild all dependencies.
libcdio and libcdio-paranoia
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:50:16AM +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2018-01-18 22:25 GMT+01:00 Adrian Reber :
> > libcdio upstream released the 2.0 version a few weeks ago and I will
> > updated rawhide to the latest libcdio version. It comes with a new
> > soname and I
libcdio upstream released the 2.0 version a few weeks ago and I will
updated rawhide to the latest libcdio version. It comes with a new
soname and I will also rebuild all dependencies.
Adrian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 08:13:16AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> Recently libcdio upstream released a new version of libcdio. I will
> update rawhide to this latest libcdio version and rebuild all
> dependencies.
libcdio and all dependencies have been rebuilt.
Recently libcdio upstream released a new version of libcdio. I will
update rawhide to this latest libcdio version and rebuild all
dependencies.
Adrian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel
IGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
rawmemchr () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/rawmemchr.S:37
37 movdqu (%rdi), %xmm0
does anyone have any idea about this? is my ram dying?
Thank you!
Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
devel m
upgrading from db4 to db5.
Adrian
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 09/19/2016 03:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>
>> On 09/19/2016 03:19 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi! After updating the ksensors packages i got this errors :
>>>>
>>>> Cleanup
On 09/19/2016 03:19 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>
>> Hi! After updating the ksensors packages i got this errors :
>>
>> Cleanup : ksensors-0.7.3-30.fc23.x86_64 33/34
>> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DrghhQ: line 4: syntax error near unexp
d at
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ksensors/ ?
Thanks!
Adrian
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 09/06/2016 02:43 PM, Till Hofmann wrote:
> On 09/06/2016 01:35 PM, Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
>> Hi! I have a head scratching problem with a project (clhep) that i try to
>> package.
>> It is cmake based and the spec file can be seen here:
>> https://github.com/
Hi! I have a head scratching problem with a project (clhep) that i try to
package.
It is cmake based and the spec file can be seen here:
https://github.com/adriansev/SPECS/blob/master/clhep.spec
the error that i get is :
Found '/home/adrian/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/clhep-2.3.3.2-1.x86_64' in
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 12:46:00PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 07/05/2016 11:09 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:04:03AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
> > > wrote:
> > > &g
; No really because of mirrors etc, but mirror manager stats from Feb
> (FPL DevConf talk) list i686 as around 20% unique IP hits, that
> doesn't take into account proxies/NAT using same IP etc.
What clients are requesting from MirrorManager can also be seen here:
https://admin.fedoraproje
2015-11-02 21:36 GMT-03:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:33:45 -0300
> Adrian Soliard wrote:
>
>> 've a question:
>>
>> Installing F23 RC10 is the same that wait to the final release? I'm
>> planning to install it now, tomorrow I will not have
rt in *some* form releasing stuff more
> frequently, it's possible. We have the technology, and we're making it
> better quite frequently. I believe there are plans this cycle to
> regularly publish updated Cloud (including Atomic host) images, which
> will certainly form a
> Fedora Project Leader
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
Adrian Soliard
asoli...@fedoraproject.org
https://fedoraproject.org/w
i/Changes/Policy
> ___
> devel-announce mailing list
> devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
--
Adrian Soliard
asoli...@fedoraproject.org
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:A
elease.x86_64").
The case was present on two different computers
Why dnf don't recognize that packages?
--
Adrian Soliard
asoli...@fedoraproject.org
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Asoliard
http://www.adriansoliard.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
from 2002 and upstream does not exist anymore.
Most of the other Linux distributions do not even ship it, although
there are other packages which are called ninja. It seems the name ninja
is already taken multiple times and maybe not a good idea for future
projects.
Adrian
[1] http
2015-01-13 6:33 GMT-03:00 Radek Holy :
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Jan Zelený"
>> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 8:33:21 AM
>> Subject: Re: A little problem with dnf
>>
>> On 12. 1. 2015 at 07:55:2
2015-01-12 5:35 GMT-03:00 Igor Gnatenko :
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
>> On 11. 1. 2015 at 20:40:56, Adrian Soliard wrote:
>>> Hi everyone!
>>>I'm struggling a bit with dnf. It may have advantages, but as an
>>> end-user, I
2015-01-11 20:42 GMT-03:00 Igor Gnatenko :
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Adrian Soliard
> wrote:
>> Hi everyone!
>>I'm struggling a bit with dnf. It may have advantages, but as an
>> end-user, I'm fighting with the list of packages when I press TAB.
&
wer, and surely will improve, I'm just writing to
let seated such problem.
[1] http://asoliard.fedorapeople.org/dnf.png
--
Adrian Soliard
asoli...@fedoraproject.org
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Asoliard
http://www.adriansoliard.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
libcdio has been updated to 0.93 in rawhide. As always this includes a
new soname. All dependencies have been rebuilt.
Adrian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
d how do I do it?
> Yours sincerely,
> Christopher Meng
>
> Noob here.
>
> http://cicku.me
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-
Hi! I'm Adrian Soliard (FAS:asoliard), from Argentina.
I'm trying to package GNS3, a graphical network simulator, that
software needs dynamips (a Cisco router emulator).
I recently start with the joining process to the package maintainers
team, and find in the Package Review Track
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:13:44AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:02:57AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> > CONFIG_NAMESPACES seems to be required to make all those activated _NS
> >&
g-generic:CONFIG_IPC_NS=y
> > config-generic:CONFIG_NET_NS=y
>
> Those might be doable.
To make it clear. This already what is in the kernel package and not a
change I made. It just needs CONFIG_NAMESPACES to actually be enabled.
Adrian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapro
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:02:57AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 03:37:46PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
> >> wrote:
> >&g
s too experimental then the package can easily be retired again.
Adrian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
NS=y
config-generic:CONFIG_NET_NS=y
Adrian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 09:03:58AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:22:18 +0100
> Adrian Reber wrote:
>
> > Some weeks ago libcdio 0.90 has been released. In addition to the
> > libcdio-0.90 release there have been parts split off into a separate
>
why am not in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NodeJS If i was the
first one on start with NODEJS package
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Adrian Alves wrote:
> why am not in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NodeJS If i was the
> first one on start with NODEJS package
&g
why am not in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NodeJS If i was the
first one on start with NODEJS package
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are
> required
> to pass through the community review by an
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:22:18PM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> Some weeks ago libcdio 0.90 has been released. In addition to the
> libcdio-0.90 release there have been parts split off into a separate
> package called libcdio-paranoia. libcdio-paranoia has been imported and
> I w
-Original Message-
From: Bryn M. Reeves
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Cc: Miloslav Trmač
Subject: Re: fltk
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:01:40 +
On 19/12/12 17:30, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 6:2
: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:17:22 -0500
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 01:55 +1000, Adrian wrote:
> No it is not, the reason flrig cannot be built in fedora as it is easy
> in Ubuntu. Lets not get behind the 8 ball.
Assuming by flrig you mean this:
http://www.w1hkj.com/downloads/flrig/flrig-1.3.09.tar.gz
+0200
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:12:38 +1000
Adrian wrote:
>
> Please guys get your act together on fltk, the yum build is
> ridiculous;
>
> [root@fedora18desk ~]# fltk-config --ldflags
>
> -Wl,-z,relro -lfltk
>
> should be (built from source)
>
> [root@fedora
So we see by the use of physiology, and the material rights of
substitution how resolve can be found.
Adrian ... vk4tux
-Original Message-
From: Adrian
Reply-to: linux...@yahoogroups.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: linux...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [linuxham] fltk
Date: Thu
Please guys get your act together on fltk, the yum build is ridiculous;
[root@fedora18desk ~]# fltk-config --ldflags
-Wl,-z,relro -lfltk
should be (built from source)
[root@fedora18desk ~]# fltk-config --ldflags
-L/usr/local/lib -lfltk -lXext -lXft -lfontconfig -lXinerama -lpthread
-ldl -lm
the next few days and adjust the depending packages to
require both libraries where necessary.
Adrian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I also have a nvidia device in fc17x86_64. Using fedup-cli to update I have
issues;
[root@fedora17desk ~]# fedup-cli --network 18 --debuglog fedupdebug.log
--instrepo
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/18-Beta/Fedora/x86_64/os
setting up repos...
instrepo
d on an
> >> aditional userspace package to work (to be submitted any time soon)
> >
> > Which package(s)? The criu-tools have already been packaged by Adrian
> > Reber, so that's at least one down.
> >
>
> For live migration, that would be enough. I was
hello guy I want to build smuxi irc client for fedora but just wondering
first if anybody is working on it?
http://www.smuxi.org/page/About
Let me know asap
Regards, Adrian.-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ts.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
In /etc/default/grub if you uncomment the theme line it gave an error
about fireworks.png doesnt exist
Any body had this issue?
Regards, Adrian.-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
am about to build this anybody working on it?
Regards, Adrian.-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I like the idea like debian does update-grub2 it looks like grub2-mkconfig
its the same thing probably we can switch or remove grubby and just use
grub2-mkconfig its a little bit confusing had both
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ben Rosser wrote:
> > It seems to me that we
Hello guys anybody working on it if not am about to build it
http://www.sourcefabric.org/en/airtime/download/
Regards, Adrian.-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Vascom wrote:
> They can check this Package Review Request
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713
>
> 2012/6/7 Stephen Gallagher :
> > On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:51 -0300, Adrian Alves wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >&
am not following what u mean?
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 23:00:29 -0300, Adrian Alves wrote:
>
> > done I built it, check this out:
> >
> > Spec URL: http://alvesadrian.fedorapeople.org/supercat.spec
>
12:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:15:06AM -0300, Adrian Alves wrote:
> > Hey guys am about to package this app:
> > http://supercat.nosredna.net/
> >
> > anybody is working on it? just for case.
>
> No, at least they haven
Hey guys am about to package this app:
http://supercat.nosredna.net/
anybody is working on it? just for case.
Regards, Adrian.-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo