Hello all,
as announced on
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/176354.html,
I'm going to rebuild libjpeg-turbo with ".62.0.0" ABI and then start rebuilds of
all dependant pkgs. Please excuse intermittent rawhide buildroot breakage which
can happen.
Regards,
rchive/message.php?msg_id=30352465
> >>
> >>I'm going to build the libjpeg-turbo pkg with jpeg6 API/ABI and then
> >>I will
> >>start with rebuilds of all dependent packages. This can probably
> >>happen during
> >>Friday.
> >>
>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:59:10PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 21:55 +0100, Adam Tkac wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
> > > > As decided by FESCo on 20
her bind major upgrades?
Yes because there is _no_ backward compatibility with current bind9.
Configuration is completely different, management is completely different etc...
People definitely need some time for testing and transition to bind10.
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 09:38:29AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:14:26 +0100
> Adam Tkac wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided
> > to drop the "jpeg8 API/ABI" feature a
y.
Any comments are welcome.
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 15/01/13 20:04, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > On 01/15/2013 01:01 PM, Adam Tkac wrote:
> >
> >> Another interesting thread is
> >> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=30
dated and really ill-equipped to handle new formats, which is why these
> API/ABI incompatibilities keep popping up with the IJG's software.
>
> However, I want this project to be whatever the community wants it to
> be. I don't think we're well-positioned to be a haven f
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 02:51:01PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 16:43 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Adam Tkac (at...@redhat.com) said:
> > > > I've just created
>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:35:56AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Adam Tkac (at...@redhat.com) said:
> > I've just created
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI page which
> > contains plan how to successfully move from current jpeg6 A
have
provenpackager privileges, I will cook some script which will rebuild all
pkgs automatically so no action will be required from maintainers.
If there are no objections against this approach, I will start with this task
next week.
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing
08889, this
backward incompatibility should be documented somewhere but I'm not sure where.
Can you please point me where should I document it? Thank you in advance.
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
On 11/12/2011 09:58 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:10:09PM +0100, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
>> Am Freitag, 11. November 2011, 10:47:12 schrieb Adam Tkac:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> today I tried to upload new bind tarball via `fedpkg new-sou
On 11/11/2011 12:11 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:17:20 + (UTC), AR (Andre) wrote:
>
>> Adam Tkac redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> today I tried to upload new bind tarball via `fedpkg new-sources`
>>> command but it failed with
>>&
Hello,
today I tried to upload new bind tarball via `fedpkg new-sources`
command but it failed with
"pycurl.error: (60, 'Peer certificate cannot be authenticated with given
CA certificates')" error.
I though there is problem with my ~/.fedora* certificates but after
inspection all fedora* command
On 09/20/2011 05:19 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:00 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> Hi developers of NM and Fedora,
>>
>> We are trying to get DNSSEC validation on the end nodes. One way of doing
>> that is to run a caching resolver on every host, but that strains the
>> DNS inf
On 09/17/2011 08:00 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Hi developers of NM and Fedora,
>
> We are trying to get DNSSEC validation on the end nodes. One way of doing
> that is to run a caching resolver on every host, but that strains the
> DNS infrastructure because all DNS caches would be circumvented. Sinc
Hello Ankur,
our current libjpeg-turbo build in Fedora is 100% API/ABI compatible
with former ijg libjpeg 6b. I would recommend to simply package the
application and try to build it against libjpeg-turbo. If something
fails, feel free to send me a mail with details and I will try to help you.
Reg
Hello all,
I'm trying to package systemd service file for tigervnc server and to
find a solution how to make it backward-compatible with current format
of the /etc/sysconfig/vncservers.
Current /etc/sysconfig/vncservers has following options (example):
VNCSERVERS="1:user1 2:user2"
VNCSERVERARGS[
wxrwxrwx /usr/lib/libisccfg-export.so.62
> > -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/libisccfg-export.so.62.0.0
> >
> > They ought to be chmod +x.
>
> Thanks! That helped.
>
> Adrian
This is now fixed in bind-9.7.3-0.5.rc1.fc15.
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, I
;t stand in the way of decode support.
We decided to accept arithmetic method into libjpeg-turbo upstream as
soon as Fedora legal says it's fine.
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
commit acf6c396c24366416725a0b0d1dc32c98b80a94b
Author: Adam Tkac
Date: Tue Aug 24 15:35:41 2010 +0200
Fix testsuite to run with the latest sqlite (bugs.debian.org/59).
Signed-off-by: Adam Tkac
...-clean-temporary-files-in-child-processes.patch | 49
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:54:25PM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 24/08/10 13:45, Adam Tkac wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > it seems there are some issues with recent mass rebuilds for perl
> > 5.12.0 in F14/rawhide.
> >
> > Some packages were rebuilt aga
mmaslano
This is really odd, what would be the best way to fix this issue?
Rebuild of affected packages?
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ther put patches
into bugzilla and let package maintainers push the patches?
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
O.
>
> And SSH is only vulnerable to MITM attacks on the first connection in
> general and I guess that SSHFP records are not used anymore after the
> first connection. What would they be good for when the host key is
> already known to SSH?
SSHFP records are useless when fingerprint is already known.
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 09:55:08PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/7/1 Adam Tkac :
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:31:45PM -0400, Rich Mattes wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >> I'm trying to build a package that has a BuildRequires: libj
table for me in development branch.
What is your opinion about this proposal?
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
which will be
broken by this step.
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
x27;s not assembler code, libjpeg-turbo is currently using
same ASM code for both x86 and x64.
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:51:56PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Adam Tkac wrote:
> > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:33:38PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm going to create a Fedora feature for this task.
> >
> > Done
As said there, libjpeg-turbo has nearly same performance as Intel's IPP.
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 05:33:38PM +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
>
> I'm going to create a Fedora feature for this task.
Done. You can check
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/libjpeg-turbo.
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
-turbo merge into the original ijg's code and get Fedora to
> > rebase on that unique source instead?
>
> The problem, as I said before, is that the libjpeg upstream is not
> being developed in an open manner.
This is pretty big issue.
> I've emailed Adam Tkac to bring h
, well.
Especially when he actively maintains it for more than four years. It
of course doesn't mean he should drop ntp from distro. It will be here
for people who prefer it. "Default" means "this is generally the best",
not that "this is the fastest" or "t
35 matches
Mail list logo
