OLD: Fedora-eln-20250915.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250916.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 48
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 11:51:41AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-09-15 at 10:06 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 09:47:53AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > > Oh, if you think a side tag would be better I'm happy to defer to that
> > > :) I just wanted to
On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 10:25:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-09-12 at 11:43 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > ~3700 individual updates hitting Bodhi over a short period is almost
> > certainly going to cause problems with the load, similar to trying to
> > manually create a sin
On Mon, 2025-09-15 at 10:06 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 09:47:53AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > Oh, if you think a side tag would be better I'm happy to defer to that
> > :) I just wanted to note I don't think the problems in Bodhi are
> > *quite* as bad as suggest
My last attempt at this did not really pan out, so I am trying again.
I am looking for contributors interested in co-maintaining
rpminspect-data-fedora. Including the upstream project, the package in
dist-git, and builds for Fedora and EPEL.
The rpminspect-data-fedora project contains all of t
I would add to that that people using ptrace are very likely to be
familiar with this flag at this point, especially if most distros have
the yama flag set to 1.
On 9/15/25 6:38 AM, Christopher Klooz wrote:
On 15/09/2025 15.11, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 9/13/25 11:02 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
I
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 09:47:53AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Oh, if you think a side tag would be better I'm happy to defer to that
> :) I just wanted to note I don't think the problems in Bodhi are
> *quite* as bad as suggested. Of course we never know for sure till we
> try.
It might be
OLD: Fedora-43-20250914.n.0
NEW: Fedora-43-20250915.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:14
Upgraded packages: 18
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 58.93 KiB
Size of dropped packages:7.96 MiB
On Mon, 2025-09-15 at 09:25 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 10:25:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2025-09-12 at 11:43 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > ~3700 individual updates hitting Bodhi over a short period is almost
> > > certainly going to cause problems
On 15/09/2025 15.11, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 9/13/25 11:02 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
I believe a lot of people run tools like strace, pstack or eu-stack to
quickly see where and how their own (already running) processes are
stuck. At least I do.
Amen.
I will add that getting along-running proce
Hi all,
there is ghostscript rebase coming into rawhide and there is
incompatible change based on the release note:
- non-standard operator selectdevice is removed - "setpagedevice" is
required to use instead.
Anyone with Postscript files or who calls Ghostscript and uses the
removed opera
On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 6:50 AM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Should a packager simply be able to "take" the maintenance of a package
> that has been orphaned in EPEL only?
>
> I would argue yes, but I could see objections. Has this been decided
> anywhere or is it just a limitation of the pagure int
Should a packager simply be able to "take" the maintenance of a package
that has been orphaned in EPEL only?
I would argue yes, but I could see objections. Has this been decided
anywhere or is it just a limitation of the pagure interface?
--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least imp
On 9/13/25 11:02 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
I believe a lot of people run tools like strace, pstack or eu-stack to
quickly see where and how their own (already running) processes are
stuck. At least I do.
Amen.
I will add that getting along-running process to finally hit that race
condition and
Hi Marcin,
On Sun, 2025-09-14 at 21:00 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> I maintain the system-calls Python package upstream. It gets new version
> whenever there are new system calls in the Linux kernel.
> [...]
> Recently I decided to retire it from Fedora. It is a niche package, very
> low
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250914.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250915.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:3
Upgraded packages: 61
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:2.31 MiB
Hi,
I have orphaned python-arpeggio, python-parver.
They were dependencies of pipenv, whichy was retired a long time ago.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Fedora Matrix: mhroncok
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
17 matches
Mail list logo
