On 19/08/2025 04:13, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Ewww, why does Fedora even enable anti-downgrade restrictions at all?
Microsoft require SBAT now: https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
--
___
d
Hi all,
There are two packages I maintain from different upstream developers
that the setup.py is generated during the build, so they are
setup.py.in. However, the new buildrequires macros [1] are expecting the
setup.py to already exist, or the pyproject.toml, which could also be a
pyproject.
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250818.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250819.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 192
Downgraded packages: 1
Size of added packages: 16.51 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
> Building the upstream kernel with Fedora’s current kernel config fails
> after setting CONFIG_EFI_SBAT_FILE to kernel.sbat [1].
Ewww, why does Fedora even enable anti-downgrade restrictions at all? That
is one of the worst freedom-restricting bootloader misfeatures out t
Minutes:
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-08-13/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-08-13-15.30.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-08-13/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-08-13-15.30.txt
Log:
https://meetbo
This is now done.
Sandro
On 17.08.25 23:39, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
I'm planning to build assimp-6.0.2 which carries a soname bump, for
rawhide and F43 in respective side tags the coming days, and I'll also
rebuild the following dependent packages:
f3d
pioneer
qt5-qt3d
qt6-qtquick3d
vkmark
OLD: Fedora-43-20250817.n.0
NEW: Fedora-43-20250818.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 175
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.32 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 43 Branched 20250818.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Hi, after upgrading to Fedora 43 I noticed my OpenVPN connection was
broken due to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/droppingOfCertPemFile
I see in my journal:
nm-openvpn[32218]: DEPRECATED OPTION: --cipher set to 'AES-256-CBC' but
missing in --data-ciphers (AES-256-GCM:AES-128-GCM:CHACH
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 3:53 PM Ming Lei wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to add `export RUSTFLAGS="${RUSTFLAGS}
> --cfg=io_uring_skip_arch_check"`
> during %build, however looks it doesn't work, please see the following log[1]:
>
> + export 'RUSTFLAGS=-Copt-level=3 -Cdebuginfo=2 -Ccodegen-units=
Hi,
Building the upstream kernel with Fedora’s current kernel config fails
after setting CONFIG_EFI_SBAT_FILE to kernel.sbat [1].
The build stops with the following error:
CC arch/x86/boot/compressed/tdx-shared.o
CC arch/x86/boot/compressed/mem.o
make[3]: *** No rule to make target
Ming Lei wrote on 2025/08/18 22:53:
Hello,
I am trying to add `export RUSTFLAGS="${RUSTFLAGS}
--cfg=io_uring_skip_arch_check"`
during %build, however looks it doesn't work, please see the following log[1]:
+ export 'RUSTFLAGS=-Copt-level=3 -Cdebuginfo=2 -Ccodegen-units=1
-Cstrip=none -Clink-arg
Hello,
I am trying to add `export RUSTFLAGS="${RUSTFLAGS}
--cfg=io_uring_skip_arch_check"`
during %build, however looks it doesn't work, please see the following log[1]:
+ export 'RUSTFLAGS=-Copt-level=3 -Cdebuginfo=2 -Ccodegen-units=1
-Cstrip=none -Clink-arg=-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-pac
On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 01:44:45PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 8/11/25 13:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2025 at 11:31:58AM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
> > > I've been maintaining this package for a long time. It's pretty
> > > stable, and most bugs get fixed in the Linux kernel
Benson Muite wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2025, at 10:15 PM, Rasmus Karlsson wrote:
> > My initial goal would be to revive the Chatterino package in
> > Fedora[2]. If someone is interested in sponsoring me to help me
> > package it, please let me know!
>
> As Chatterino has been orphaned for more th
Hi Benson, thanks for the welcome!
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 at 07:45, Benson Muite wrote:
> As Chatterino has been orphaned for more than 6 weeks, please create
> a new RPM package and once done submit a request to have the package
> reviewed, see:
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-main
16 matches
Mail list logo
