have set %global _lto_cflags %{nil} as you suggested.
[1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/gdb.txt
Regards
Martin
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.or
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250603.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250604.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 24
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Hi everyone,
The results of the F42 elections are in! You can view the results in the
blog post[1] on the Fedora Community blog[2].
Congratulations to our newly elected representatives and thank you to all
of our great candidates in this election cycle!
Kindest regards,
Aoife
[1] https://commu
On 02/06/2025 12:09, Martin Gansser wrote:
I have installed speed-dreams-2.4.2 and noticed that a SIGSEGV, segmentation
fault
Can you try building without LTO optimizations?
%global _lto_cflags %{nil}
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
--
_
On 03/06/2025 11:13, Florian Weimer wrote:
If you use RelWithDebInfo instead, as Martin suggested, you'll get a
better debugging experience.
On Fedora, you won't notice any difference between the Release and
RelWithDebInfo build configurations, since Fedora's build flags already
include the -
the build section of the speed-dreams.spec file looks like this on my local
build:
"%build
%cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=RelWithDebInfo \
-DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=OFF\
-DOPTION_DEBUG:STRING=ON \
-DCMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS="-W
Hi Michal,
On 3-Jun-25 12:51 PM, Michal Schorm wrote:
> Thanks for the insight !
>
> I still wonder why the 'acpi=on' helped on the one machine.
> Because it made a difference, I assume the 'acpi=on' is a different
> value than the compiled-in default.
>
> I tried to look up what the default is.
Dne 02. 06. 25 v 1:40 odp. Martin Gansser napsal(a):
speed-dreams-debuginfo-2.4.2-1.fc42.x86_64 is already installed.
Regards
Martin
No need to install it locally with debuginfod. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Debuginfod and
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2019/10/14/introducing-debu
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250602.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250603.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 20
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On 6/3/25 11:48, Michal Domonkos wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 05:12:41PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
We had recently changed how we handle debuginfo in JDK:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-latest-openjdk/pull-request/147#request_diff
Main change is, that we create debuginfo manually. U
Thanks for the insight !
I still wonder why the 'acpi=on' helped on the one machine.
Because it made a difference, I assume the 'acpi=on' is a different
value than the compiled-in default.
I tried to look up what the default is.
I looked here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/blob/raw
hi!
That would be very long story...
JDK have feature of jlink. This can link a native image from only really needed subset of
jdk, and your applciation. To do this, it was using jmod files. which contained copy of
jdk "prepared" for jlinking.
The https://openjdk.org/jeps/493 allowed to do th
On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 10:18 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> V Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 09:40:55PM +0100, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> napsal(a):
> > The proposed macros for adding new flags are:
> >
> > %_pkg_extra_cflags
> > %_pkg_extra_cxxflags
> > %_pkg_extra_fflags
> > %_pkg_extra
Hi Michal,
On 3-Jun-25 11:35 AM, Michal Schorm wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 4:09 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
>> I'm not sure why you are specifying apci=off in the first place?
>
> On the system where I started, I met some ACPI related errors in the
> kernel ring buffer.
Firmware ACPI tables oft
On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 05:12:41PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> We had recently changed how we handle debuginfo in JDK:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-latest-openjdk/pull-request/147#request_diff
> Main change is, that we create debuginfo manually. Unluckily it was
> developed with rpm 4.
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250602.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250603.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:14
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 70
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 993.37 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 4:09 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
> I'm not sure why you are specifying apci=off in the first place?
On the system where I started, I met some ACPI related errors in the
kernel ring buffer.
Disabling the problematic functionality often works as a good starting
ground for me when
* Jiri Vanek:
> Hi Florian, thanx a lot for kind reply!
>
> I saw the wrapper you have, and found it quite intensive. I was trying much
> more simple workarounds, and also similar macro redefinition, but withotu
> success.
>
> I'm, not sure I need any redefinition at all. The only thing I know i
* Martin Gansser:
> i think the current backtrace log [1] is also useless.
> [1] ]https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/gdb2.txt
>
> Yes, i used on the koji buidl this Option:
> '-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE:STRING=Release'
If you use RelWithDebInfo instead, as Martin suggested, you'll get a
bet
Hi Florian, thanx a lot for kind reply!
I saw the wrapper you have, and found it quite intensive. I was trying much
more simple workarounds, and also similar macro redefinition, but withotu
success.
I'm, not sure I need any redefinition at all. The only thing I know is that rpm 4.1 is ignoring
I have incorrectly stated "I'm, not sure I need any redefinition at all". it
is not precisse. It seems tah in 4.1 the custom debuginfo packages needed the debuginfo
enabled, however the debuginfo macros redefined to nil.
That is what pointed me to search for debuginfo macro refeiniton and to
V Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 09:40:55PM +0100, Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
napsal(a):
> The proposed macros for adding new flags are:
>
> %_pkg_extra_cflags
> %_pkg_extra_cxxflags
> %_pkg_extra_fflags
> %_pkg_extra_ldflags
>
Does the leading underscore have any purpose? AFAIK RPM m
maybe the next steps helps, i am not a debugging specialist.
Thread 1 "speed-dreams-2" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x7fffb11687dc in ?? ()
(gdb) bt full
#0 0x7fffb11687dc in ??? ()
#1 0x7fffdb60 in ??? ()
#2 0x77a90592 in _int_free (av=, p=,
have_lock=
23 matches
Mail list logo
