Re: Fedora Non-responsive maintainer check for fab

2025-05-28 Thread Federico Pellegrin
Hi, Il giorno gio 29 mag 2025 alle ore 06:20 Federico Pellegrin < f...@evolware.org> ha scritto: > > I'm a bit surprised about what you mention for F41 as with F40 I had > multiple problems due to Python incompatibilities, so while I did not try > (jumped 40->42) I'd imagine the same ones would b

Re: Remove openh264?

2025-05-28 Thread Roy Bekken
On Thu, 29 May 2025 at 00:19, Neal Gompa wrote: > Honestly, we don't really push for security like that. We have > generally provided optionality, but that doesn't mean we want security > to outweigh our community and usability. This have a CVE score of 8.6 and it only goes as high as 10... htt

Re: Fedora Non-responsive maintainer check for fab

2025-05-28 Thread Federico Pellegrin
Hi, Il giorno gio 29 mag 2025 alle ore 00:08 Christian Krause < c...@fedoraproject.org> ha scritto: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 12:04 PM Christian Krause > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 8:08 AM Sandro wrote: >> >>> On 28-05-2025 06:26, Federico Pellegrin wrote: >>> > I'm t

Re: Fedora Non-responsive maintainer check for fab

2025-05-28 Thread Carl George
Previous non-responsive bugs for this maintainer, all closed as WONTFIX or NOTABUG: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786212 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991129 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107697 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212490

Re: Remove openh264?

2025-05-28 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 5:52 PM Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said: > > On Wed, May 28 2025 at 03:19:49 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams > > wrote: > > >So it's been another month and this still isn't resolved. I know > > >people > > >on the Fedora side have been trying (d

Re: Fedora Non-responsive maintainer check for fab

2025-05-28 Thread Christian Krause
Hi, On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 12:04 PM Christian Krause wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 8:08 AM Sandro wrote: > >> On 28-05-2025 06:26, Federico Pellegrin wrote: >> > I'm trying to get pysnmp have a working build (broken since Fedora 40). >> I >> > had the luck to had the fix merged a fe

Re: Remove openh264?

2025-05-28 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said: > On Wed, May 28 2025 at 03:19:49 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams > wrote: > >So it's been another month and this still isn't resolved. I know > >people > >on the Fedora side have been trying (don't want to complain about > >effort). But if Fedora can't relia

Re: Remove openh264?

2025-05-28 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Wed, May 28 2025 at 03:19:49 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams wrote: So it's been another month and this still isn't resolved. I know people on the Fedora side have been trying (don't want to complain about effort). But if Fedora can't reliably get timely updates to a package that has high securi

Re: Reducing reliance on "legacy" user-group store(s) like /etc/{passwd,group}

2025-05-28 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 28.05.25 16:51, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK_NONBLOCK, 0) = 4 > > > connect(4, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, > > > sun_path="/run/systemd/userdb/io.systemd.DynamicUser"}, 45) = 0 > > > socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK

Re: Remove openh264?

2025-05-28 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said: > On Tue, Apr 29 2025 at 11:00:18 AM -05:00:00, Chris Adams > wrote: > >I'm asking because there's a high-priority CVE on openh264 for months > >that doesn't seem like it's progressing towards getting resolved in > >Fedora. > > For context on this, see:

Re: Fedora Council statement on Proven Packager situation

2025-05-28 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [28/05/2025 15:24] : > > No, I don't think we'll make the issue public. Among other reasons, > there is a lot of discussion about personal matters. Making it publicly > visible would go against the goal of avoiding making this public. Back in December, we were told th

Emacs on Fedora 41 - Updates Policy Exception

2025-05-28 Thread Benson Muite
FESCo approved an update of Emacs to 30.1 on Fedora 41 due to a CVE on the current version of Emacs in Fedora 41. It is currently in testing. Feedback to Emacs maintainers is welcome. Benson -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Reducing reliance on "legacy" user-group store(s) like /etc/{passwd,group}

2025-05-28 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Wednesday, 28 May 2025 15:51:27 CEST Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On Срд, 28 мая 2025, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > >On Mi, 28.05.25 12:34, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > >> > a group record it will combine a specific userdb group record from one > >> > backend with the

Re: Reducing reliance on "legacy" user-group store(s) like /etc/{passwd,group}

2025-05-28 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Tuesday, 27 May 2025 20:32:45 CEST Neal Gompa wrote: > The usage of the systemd user management suite has been discussed many > times over the past several years. Unfortunately, it has been designed > in such a way that it is impossible to square with central login > services (like AD/IPA/krb5 l

Re: Fedora Council statement on Proven Packager situation

2025-05-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 11:35:04AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Matthew Miller venit, vidit, dixit 2025-05-22 17:15:12: > > The Fedora Council overturns FESCo's decision [3284] to remove Proven > > Packager rights from a contributor. > > > > FESCo didn't have a specific policy for dealing with

Moby Engine/Docker CLI Updates Policy Exception

2025-05-28 Thread Brad Smith
Of potential interest to Docker users and developers on Fedora. FESCo has approved an exception to the updates policy for the moby-engine package in Fedora. With this exception, the current release for the moby-engine package will be available across all Fedora releases. The moby-engine package in

Re: Fedora Council statement on Proven Packager situation

2025-05-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 06:09:15PM +0200, Simon de Vlieger wrote: > Hey Matthew (and rest of council), > > On Thu, May 22, 2025, at 5:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > The Fedora Council overturns FESCo's decision [3284] to remove Proven > > Packager rights from a contributor. > > The linked issue

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2025-05-28 Thread yselkowitz
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: ELN SIG on 2025-05-29 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 US/Eastern At meet...@fedoraproject.org The meeting will be about: Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/11018/ -- ___ devel mailin

Re: Reducing reliance on "legacy" user-group store(s) like /etc/{passwd,group}

2025-05-28 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Срд, 28 мая 2025, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mi, 28.05.25 12:34, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote: > a group record it will combine a specific userdb group record from one > backend with the results of a matching GetMemberships() of *all* > backends and return that as one "str

[HEADS UP] Fedora 43 Python 3.14 rebuilds to start in a side tag (hopefully) next week

2025-05-28 Thread Karolina Surma
Hello, To deliver Python 3.14 with Fedora Linux 43, we will run a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.14 Python 3.14.0b2 has been released on Monday, May 26th, 2025 and shipped in all Fedoras. We hope to start the mass rebuild beginning next week.

Re: Reducing reliance on "legacy" user-group store(s) like /etc/{passwd,group}

2025-05-28 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 28.05.25 12:34, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote: > > a group record it will combine a specific userdb group record from one > > backend with the results of a matching GetMemberships() of *all* > > backends and return that as one "struct group" NSS record. Or in other > > words

Re: Fedora Non-responsive maintainer check for fab

2025-05-28 Thread Christian Krause
Hi, On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 8:08 AM Sandro wrote: > On 28-05-2025 06:26, Federico Pellegrin wrote: > > I'm trying to get pysnmp have a working build (broken since Fedora 40). I > > had the luck to had the fix merged a few months ago, but was never built > > despite multiple reminders so it still

Re: Reducing reliance on "legacy" user-group store(s) like /etc/{passwd,group}

2025-05-28 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Срд, 28 мая 2025, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mi, 28.05.25 09:43, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote: On Аўт, 27 мая 2025, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 27.05.25 14:32, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > The usage of the systemd user management suite has been discu

Re: Reducing reliance on "legacy" user-group store(s) like /etc/{passwd,group}

2025-05-28 Thread Pramod V U via devel
On Wednesday, May 28th, 2025 at 12:46 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mi, 28.05.25 09:43, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > There > > are few issues with userdb API implementation. For example, there is an > > assumption only one responder knows the information about the a

Re: Reducing reliance on "legacy" user-group store(s) like /etc/{passwd,group}

2025-05-28 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 28.05.25 09:43, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote: > On Аўт, 27 мая 2025, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Di, 27.05.25 14:32, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > The usage of the systemd user management suite has been discussed many > > > times over the past severa