Hi,
Il giorno gio 29 mag 2025 alle ore 06:20 Federico Pellegrin <
f...@evolware.org> ha scritto:
>
> I'm a bit surprised about what you mention for F41 as with F40 I had
> multiple problems due to Python incompatibilities, so while I did not try
> (jumped 40->42) I'd imagine the same ones would b
On Thu, 29 May 2025 at 00:19, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Honestly, we don't really push for security like that. We have
> generally provided optionality, but that doesn't mean we want security
> to outweigh our community and usability.
This have a CVE score of 8.6 and it only goes as high as 10...
htt
Hi,
Il giorno gio 29 mag 2025 alle ore 00:08 Christian Krause <
c...@fedoraproject.org> ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 12:04 PM Christian Krause
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 8:08 AM Sandro wrote:
>>
>>> On 28-05-2025 06:26, Federico Pellegrin wrote:
>>> > I'm t
Previous non-responsive bugs for this maintainer, all closed as
WONTFIX or NOTABUG:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1786212
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991129
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107697
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212490
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 5:52 PM Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said:
> > On Wed, May 28 2025 at 03:19:49 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams
> > wrote:
> > >So it's been another month and this still isn't resolved. I know
> > >people
> > >on the Fedora side have been trying (d
Hi,
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 12:04 PM Christian Krause
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 8:08 AM Sandro wrote:
>
>> On 28-05-2025 06:26, Federico Pellegrin wrote:
>> > I'm trying to get pysnmp have a working build (broken since Fedora 40).
>> I
>> > had the luck to had the fix merged a fe
Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said:
> On Wed, May 28 2025 at 03:19:49 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams
> wrote:
> >So it's been another month and this still isn't resolved. I know
> >people
> >on the Fedora side have been trying (don't want to complain about
> >effort). But if Fedora can't relia
On Wed, May 28 2025 at 03:19:49 PM -05:00:00, Chris Adams
wrote:
So it's been another month and this still isn't resolved. I know
people
on the Fedora side have been trying (don't want to complain about
effort). But if Fedora can't reliably get timely updates to a package
that has high securi
On Mi, 28.05.25 16:51, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK_NONBLOCK, 0) = 4
> > > connect(4, {sa_family=AF_UNIX,
> > > sun_path="/run/systemd/userdb/io.systemd.DynamicUser"}, 45) = 0
> > > socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC|SOCK
Once upon a time, Michael Catanzaro said:
> On Tue, Apr 29 2025 at 11:00:18 AM -05:00:00, Chris Adams
> wrote:
> >I'm asking because there's a high-priority CVE on openh264 for months
> >that doesn't seem like it's progressing towards getting resolved in
> >Fedora.
>
> For context on this, see:
* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [28/05/2025 15:24] :
>
> No, I don't think we'll make the issue public. Among other reasons,
> there is a lot of discussion about personal matters. Making it publicly
> visible would go against the goal of avoiding making this public.
Back in December, we were told th
FESCo approved an update of Emacs to 30.1 on Fedora 41 due to a CVE on the
current version of Emacs in Fedora 41. It is currently in testing. Feedback
to Emacs maintainers is welcome.
Benson
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wednesday, 28 May 2025 15:51:27 CEST Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Срд, 28 мая 2025, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> >On Mi, 28.05.25 12:34, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> >
> >> > a group record it will combine a specific userdb group record from one
> >> > backend with the
On Tuesday, 27 May 2025 20:32:45 CEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> The usage of the systemd user management suite has been discussed many
> times over the past several years. Unfortunately, it has been designed
> in such a way that it is impossible to square with central login
> services (like AD/IPA/krb5 l
On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 11:35:04AM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
> Matthew Miller venit, vidit, dixit 2025-05-22 17:15:12:
> > The Fedora Council overturns FESCo's decision [3284] to remove Proven
> > Packager rights from a contributor.
> >
> > FESCo didn't have a specific policy for dealing with
Of potential interest to Docker users and developers on Fedora.
FESCo has approved an exception to the updates policy for the
moby-engine package in Fedora. With this exception, the current
release for the moby-engine package will be available across all
Fedora releases. The moby-engine package in
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 06:09:15PM +0200, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> Hey Matthew (and rest of council),
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2025, at 5:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > The Fedora Council overturns FESCo's decision [3284] to remove Proven
> > Packager rights from a contributor.
>
> The linked issue
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2025-05-29 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 US/Eastern
At meet...@fedoraproject.org
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/11018/
--
___
devel mailin
On Срд, 28 мая 2025, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mi, 28.05.25 12:34, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote:
> a group record it will combine a specific userdb group record from one
> backend with the results of a matching GetMemberships() of *all*
> backends and return that as one "str
Hello,
To deliver Python 3.14 with Fedora Linux 43, we will run a coordinated
rebuild in a side tag.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.14
Python 3.14.0b2 has been released on Monday, May 26th, 2025 and shipped
in all Fedoras.
We hope to start the mass rebuild beginning next week.
On Mi, 28.05.25 12:34, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > a group record it will combine a specific userdb group record from one
> > backend with the results of a matching GetMemberships() of *all*
> > backends and return that as one "struct group" NSS record. Or in other
> > words
Hi,
On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 8:08 AM Sandro wrote:
> On 28-05-2025 06:26, Federico Pellegrin wrote:
> > I'm trying to get pysnmp have a working build (broken since Fedora 40). I
> > had the luck to had the fix merged a few months ago, but was never built
> > despite multiple reminders so it still
On Срд, 28 мая 2025, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mi, 28.05.25 09:43, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Аўт, 27 мая 2025, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Di, 27.05.25 14:32, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > The usage of the systemd user management suite has been discu
On Wednesday, May 28th, 2025 at 12:46 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mi, 28.05.25 09:43, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > There
> > are few issues with userdb API implementation. For example, there is an
> > assumption only one responder knows the information about the a
On Mi, 28.05.25 09:43, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Аўт, 27 мая 2025, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Di, 27.05.25 14:32, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > > The usage of the systemd user management suite has been discussed many
> > > times over the past severa
25 matches
Mail list logo