Fedora eln compose report: 20250423.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-eln-20250422.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250423.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 24 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.81 MiB Size of dropped packages:415.79 KiB

Re: RFC: Lightweight stalled request process

On Tue, 2025-04-15 at 08:08 +0200, Simon de Vlieger wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025, at 11:56 PM, Michel Lind wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > Over the past months FESCo has been considering my proposal to have > > a > > lighter weight process to get needed changes for Fedora packages > > (whether getti

Re: RFC: Lightweight stalled request process

On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 18:51 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15 2025 at 01:19:10 AM +02:00:00, Fabio Valentini > wrote: > > The non-responsive maintainer process requires that the maintainer > > is > > *entirely unresponsive*, > > which is a much higher bar than for this proposed, le

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2025-04-22)

Meeting summary --- * TOPIC: Init Process (@salimma:fedora.im, 17:01:08) * TOPIC: #3385 Change: Java25 And No More System JDK (@salimma:fedora.im, 17:06:18) jvanek, the Change Proposal author, attended to answer questions. FESCo's concern is that the Change Proposal is confusing for

F43 Change Proposal: Wayland-only GNOME (self-contained)

Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandOnlyGNOME Discussion thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-wayland-only-gnome-self-contained/150261 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes proc

F43 Change Proposal: Perl 5.42 (system-wide)

Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.42 Discussion thread - https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f43-change-proposal-perl-5-42-system-wide/150260 This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux. This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are p

Fedora Elections Nominations Open April 24

Hi everyone, Now that we are enjoying Fedora Linux 42 , it's time to hold an election...or four! On April 24, the nominations period will open for the following seats across some of the Fedora Governance groups:

Re: Userspace VT consoles in copr

On 22/04/2025 15:23, Pramod V U via devel wrote: Sorry for poking in, but why have kmscon, a complete re-implementation, run over then DRM when a generic and well-tested combination of a wayland compositor and a terminal emulator, like cage+foot, do the work just as well? Yes, setup is initiall

Re: Userspace VT consoles in copr

On 22/04/2025 15:04, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 8:46 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote: On 22/04/2025 13:25, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 5:52 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote: Hi, I've packaged 3 userspace consoles, on my copr repository for Fedora. They can replace fbcon (The

Re: rpm-ostree/bootc uid/gid drift problem

On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 8:25 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 06:52:43PM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: > > The problem stems entirely from UIDs and GUDs being numbers > > and not strings. I see this as a peculiarity of some of the filesystems, > > you target. Sa

Re: rpm-ostree/bootc uid/gid drift problem

On Di, 15.04.25 14:27, Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) wrote: > Thanks for posting this! > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, at 6:55 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > This was a known problem for rpm-ostree systems, and was handled > > ad-hoc when problems were reported, but is becoming a bigg

Re: rpm-ostree/bootc uid/gid drift problem

On Di, 15.04.25 10:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > Hi folks, > > [I'm writing this on Colin's suggestion, to introduce more people to > the discussion and hopefully get some new ideas how to solve the > problem. Apologies for the length.] > > The problem: when packages

Re: f42: hostname vs. sendmail (vs. systemd depsolver) bug?

On Mo, 21.04.25 11:16, Gabriel L. Somlo (gso...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2025 at 10:03:50PM +0100, Barry wrote: > > > On 20 Apr 2025, at 18:50, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: > > > > > > Please keep in mind that this is a "cattle" machine started from an > > > image shared with a bunch of oth

Re: Userspace VT consoles in copr

On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 9:24 AM Pramod V U via devel wrote: > > Sorry for poking in, but why have kmscon, a complete re-implementation, run > over then DRM when a generic and well-tested combination of a wayland > compositor and a terminal emulator, like cage+foot, do the work just as well? To

Re: Userspace VT consoles in copr

Sorry for poking in, but why have kmscon, a complete re-implementation, run over then DRM when a generic and well-tested combination of a wayland compositor and a terminal emulator, like cage+foot, do the work just as well? Yes, setup is initially difficult. But it might be worth it. An addition

Re: Userspace VT consoles in copr

On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 8:46 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > > On 22/04/2025 13:25, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 5:52 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've packaged 3 userspace consoles, on my copr repository for Fedora. > >> They can replace fbcon (The default kerne

Re: Userspace VT consoles in copr

On 22/04/2025 13:25, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 5:52 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote: Hi, I've packaged 3 userspace consoles, on my copr repository for Fedora. They can replace fbcon (The default kernel-based console), have more features (like scrolling) and are more secure as they ru

Re: Fedora on Raspberry Pi

On Sat, 2025-04-19 at 18:38 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote: > You don't say which image you use, an image like XFCE would be more > suited to a device with 2Gb of RAM than say Workstation. Hi, you are right, it was the Workstation (the rpi 5 did not get to the gdm either). The Raspberry OS u

Re: Userspace VT consoles in copr

On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 5:52 AM Jocelyn Falempe wrote: > > Hi, > > I've packaged 3 userspace consoles, on my copr repository for Fedora. > They can replace fbcon (The default kernel-based console), have more > features (like scrolling) and are more secure as they run in userspace. > > * Kmscon:

Re: f42: hostname vs. sendmail (vs. systemd depsolver) bug?

On Tue, 2025-04-22 at 09:11 +0100, Barry Scott wrote: > > > > On 21 Apr 2025, at 16:16, Gabriel L. Somlo > > wrote: > > > > I'm not quite sure if (and how) one could express "whatever's > > sitting > > behind hostnamectl has finally replaced `fedora` with > > `foo42.example.com` in the transien

Userspace VT consoles in copr

Hi, I've packaged 3 userspace consoles, on my copr repository for Fedora. They can replace fbcon (The default kernel-based console), have more features (like scrolling) and are more secure as they run in userspace. * Kmscon: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jfalempe/kmscon/ * Cage/foo

Re: f42: hostname vs. sendmail (vs. systemd depsolver) bug?

> On 21 Apr 2025, at 16:16, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: > > I'm not quite sure if (and how) one could express "whatever's sitting > behind hostnamectl has finally replaced `fedora` with > `foo42.example.com ` in the transient hostname > field", to make > sendmail.service

License change: python-rpmautospec

Hey, from version 0.8.0 on, the license of rpmautospec (python-rpmautospec) has changed to: MIT AND GPL-2.0-only WITH GCC-exception-2.0 AND (MIT OR GPL-2.0-or-later WITH GCC-exception-2.0) The reason for this is a new wrapper for libgit2, which rpmautospec falls back to if pygit2 isn’t present