OLD: Fedora-eln-20250312.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250313.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 80
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 513.21 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On 3/12/25 2:14 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati via devel wrote:
> * TOPIC: LLVM 20 (@fale:fale.io, 18:07:56)
> * INFO: on 25/02 it was marked as needing additional info from Change
> Owner and QA (@fale:fale.io, 18:08:26)
> * INFO: on 25/02 it was schedule to happen late, nothing to do
> (@f
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 9:49 AM Marián Konček wrote:
>
> When running a container with current Fedora Rawhide and installing
> `maven`, which transitiely causes the installation of `openh264`, I am
> getting an error:
>
> Running transaction
> Transaction failed: Signature verification failed.
> P
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025, at 2:17 PM, Peter Oliver wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2025, Michel Lind wrote:
>
>> When rolling out the rebuild of Emacs 30.1 in CentOS Hyperscale SIG, we
>> noticed package installation failures on hosts that have emacs-terminal
>> installed
>
> Hmm. In the unlikely event someon
Hi all,
at the end because of the time constrains we decided to include this
script in anaconda-live package with a plan to move it to a separate
package in the future. So, it is already there and I have PR to enable
this feature on Live systems:
https://pagure.io/livesys-scripts/pull-reques
Dear Emacs maintainers,
When rolling out the rebuild of Emacs 30.1 in CentOS Hyperscale SIG, we
noticed package installation failures on hosts that have emacs-terminal
installed (now, it's an open question whether those hosts should have
had it installed since it's not that useful on headless mach
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025, Michel Lind wrote:
When rolling out the rebuild of Emacs 30.1 in CentOS Hyperscale SIG, we
noticed package installation failures on hosts that have emacs-terminal
installed
Hmm. In the unlikely event someone actually depends on emacs-terminal, maybe a
failure is what the
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 4:51 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 02. 01. 25 v 7:08 odp. Steve Grubb napsal(a):
>
> Hello,
>
> I would recommend a change to the testing description. See below...
>
> On Tuesday, December 24, 2024 11:01:11 AM EST Aoife Moloney via devel-
> announce wrote:
>
> Wiki - htt
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-03-12/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-03-12-16.31.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-03-12/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-03-12-16.31.log.html
Text Minutes:
https://me
Dne 02. 01. 25 v 7:08 odp. Steve Grubb napsal(a):
Hello,
I would recommend a change to the testing description. See below...
On Tuesday, December 24, 2024 11:01:11 AM EST Aoife Moloney via devel-
announce wrote:
Wiki -https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMSuportForSystemdSysusers
Discussio
Dne 12. 03. 25 v 4:57 odp. Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
error: invalid sysuser type: u!
4< (%error)
error: lua script failed: [string "add_sysuser"]:22: error expanding macro
3<(%lua)
2< (%add_sysuser)
error: lua script failed: [string "__sysusers_provides"]:12: error ex
Dne 02. 01. 25 v 7:08 odp. Steve Grubb napsal(a):
Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMSuportForSystemdSysusers
Discussion thread -
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-rpm-support-for->
systemd-sysusers-d-system-wide/140621
What is equivalent to
useradd -
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 04:50:49PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 02. 01. 25 v 7:08 odp. Steve Grubb napsal(a):
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would recommend a change to the testing description. See below...
> >
> > On Tuesday, December 24, 2024 11:01:11 AM EST Aoife Moloney via devel-
> > announce wr
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 04:13:14PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 02. 01. 25 v 7:08 odp. Steve Grubb napsal(a):
> > > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPMSuportForSystemdSysusers
> > > Discussion thread -
> > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-rpm-support-
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2025-03-13 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 US/Eastern
At meet...@fedoraproject.org
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10979/
--
___
devel mailin
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 01:49:56PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> I am probably late to the party, but I recently got one of these mass
> commits and I wonder why these sysuser.d files are in %files section as
> ordinary files and not as %config?
Because they are not config files and must not be e
On 2025/03/12 13:22, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Interesting.
This is also a perfect example of how *not* to write git commit nor
changelog messages: everybody who can read those few lines of diff will
know what got removed and that it wasn't "standard" (or else it would
not have been defined manua
Hello packagers.
As a followup to this email sent a month ago to the python-devel list, I now
plan to make the incorrect (and unsafe) usage of %pyproject_buildrequires -t/-e
and %tox without a suitable tox configuration fail the build.
This is a breaking change, but I believe it's the only wa
The Fedora Linux 42 Beta Go/No-Go meeting[1] will take place on
Thursday March 13 @ 1700 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org[2].
At this time, we will determine the status of the F42 Beta release
date [3] that is currently targeting Tuesday 18th March.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_M
I am probably late to the party, but I recently got one of these mass commits and I wonder why these sysuser.d files are
in %files section as ordinary files and not as %config?
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
_
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel venit, vidit, dixit 2025-03-12 12:43:05:
> Hello.
>
> Non-standard options removal[1] from %cmake macros broke various
> packages in Rawhide[2].
>
> Some projects still use LIB_SUFFIX and LIB_INSTALL_DIR. They are all
> FTBFS now.
>
> This change was done without prope
Hello.
Non-standard options removal[1] from %cmake macros broke various
packages in Rawhide[2].
Some projects still use LIB_SUFFIX and LIB_INSTALL_DIR. They are all
FTBFS now.
This change was done without proper announcement. Please revert or make
it a system-wide change.
[1]:
https://s
Dne 11. 03. 25 v 10:36 dop. Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
It's exactly for reasons like this that rpm will not even try to automatically setup the signing - it has no way of
knowing what the right thing is.
Mock has it's own signing plugin, rpm wont interfere with it:
https://rpm-software-manageme
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 06:54:32PM -0400, Julian Anderson wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> My name is Julian Anderson, and I'm a sysadmin based in the US!
>
> I have been a very happy EL user for a few years now, and recently I became
> interested in updating EPEL builds for some packages I'd gotten used
Meeting summary
---
* TOPIC: #3364 F42 Incomplete Changes Report (@fale:fale.io, 17:03:01)
* TOPIC: KTLS implementation for GnuTLS (@fale:fale.io, 17:04:05)
* INFO: decided on 25/02 to retarget for F43 (@fale:fale.io, 17:04:28)
* TOPIC: Systemd Security Hardening (@fale:fale.io, 17:
When running a container with current Fedora Rawhide and installing
`maven`, which transitiely causes the installation of `openh264`, I am
getting an error:
Running transaction
Transaction failed: Signature verification failed.
Public key "file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-rawhide-x86_
26 matches
Mail list logo
