OLD: Fedora-eln-20250212.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250213.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 10
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On 2/12/25 04:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Orion Poplawski:
https://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.7/doc/libXt/intrinsics.html
Describes:
typedef struct _XtActionsRec {
String string;
XtActionProc proc;
} XtActionsRec, *XtActionList;
being initialized with:
XtActionsRec actionTable[] = {
{"Set",
Hi all,
Please be advised that if you are a change owner for Fedora Linux 42,
you must have your change 100% complete[1] by 18 February 2025. We
will be entering Beta Freeze on this date also as per our release
schedule[2], and if your change is not completed, it may be deferred
to another Fedora
Mario Torre wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 2:11 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
> wrote:
>>
>> Mario Torre wrote:
>> > OpenJDK 11 is EOL in Fedora regardless of the Fedora version, it hasn’t
>> > been updated in January for example.
>>
>> This is entirely unacceptable. The package shipped with Fedora
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 1:19 AM Martin Gansser wrote:
> i want to compile tntnet [2] on rawhide (f34) but this fails with this error
> message [1]:
>
> str-Test::testCompare_charp: OK
> /usr/include/c++/15/bits/stl_list.h:1650: std::__cxx11::list<_Tp,
> _Allocator>::reference std::__cxx11::list<
Hello, folks.
For the record, the Fedora Server survey is open for just another week.
If you want your opinion to be represented, I would fill in the survey
very soon if you haven't done so already.
https://fedoraproject.limequery.com/fedora-server-f41
Emmanuel
--
_
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 2:11 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
wrote:
>
> Mario Torre wrote:
> > OpenJDK 11 is EOL in Fedora regardless of the Fedora version, it hasn’t
> > been updated in January for example.
>
> This is entirely unacceptable. The package shipped with Fedora 41, so it
> MUST get security
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:25 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> The scriplets were chose, as they are always noticed. And I would sleep more
> easily, if I would know that people moved non system jdk to temurins rather
> sooner then late.
But .. they're just not.
People will only see them if they run `
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
ELN SIG on 2025-02-13 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 US/Eastern
At meet...@fedoraproject.org
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/10979/
--
___
devel mailin
On 11. 02. 25 18:40, Jednorozec wrote:
=
# #meeting:fedoraproject.org: fesco
=
Meeting started by @humaton:fedora.im at 2025-02-11 17:00:25
Coudl you please share the log links?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Fed
On 2025-02-10 18:39, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 6:21 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:48 PM Tom Rix wrote:
I am glad the gcc change came in before the branch.
But I would rather it have come into rawhide after the branch so the last weeks
before the branc
Hello everyone,
this is a reminder that fedmsg and github2fedmsg will go away tomorrow
on 13th February.
On behalf of Fedora Infrastructure team,
Michal 'Zlopez'
On 2/3/25 09:32, Michal Konecny wrote:
Hello everyone,
Fedora CoreOS team reached to us to postpone the date of
decommissioning
* Orion Poplawski:
> https://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.7/doc/libXt/intrinsics.html
>
> Describes:
>
> typedef struct _XtActionsRec {
> String string;
> XtActionProc proc;
> } XtActionsRec, *XtActionList;
>
> being initialized with:
>
>
> XtActionsRec actionTable[] = {
> {"Set", Set},
> {"Unset", Un
I noticed that error first at the Fedora CI testing farm after creating a
pull request. The error no longer exists after re-executing the pipeline.
Indeed after noticing the error on the CI, I tried on F41, my bad.
Thank you all for your help and providing information.
Kind regards,
Dimitris
On
Dne 10. 02. 25 v 21:25 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 1:56 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 06:41:07PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I started replying to everything, but then I realized it's probibly not
worth me doing so. :)
...snip...
To sum this up, I can see 3
On 2/8/25 3:27 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Mateus Rodrigues Costa said:
Em sex., 7 de fev. de 2025 às 18:56, Chris Adams escreveu:
Why is updating a Fedora 41 system with java-11-openjdk installed
getting deprecation notices for a Fedora 42 change? I got:
The java-11-ope
On 2/11/25 2:10 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Mario Torre wrote:
OpenJDK 11 is EOL in Fedora regardless of the Fedora version, it hasn’t
been updated in January for example.
Hey! It was!-)
This is entirely unacceptable. The package shipped with Fedora 41, so it
MUST get security backpo
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 08:04:58PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> https://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.7/doc/libXt/intrinsics.html
>
> Describes:
>
> typedef struct _XtActionsRec {
> String string;
> XtActionProc proc;
> } XtActionsRec, *XtActionList;
>
> being initialized with:
>
>
> XtActionsRe
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250211.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250212.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 34
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.06 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hi,
i want to compile tntnet [2] on rawhide (f34) but this fails with this error
message [1]:
str-Test::testCompare_charp: OK
/usr/include/c++/15/bits/stl_list.h:1650: std::__cxx11::list<_Tp,
_Allocator>::reference std::__cxx11::list<_Tp, _Allocator>::front() [with _Tp =
cxxtools::Connection;
Hi Orion,
On 12-Feb-25 4:04 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> https://www.x.org/releases/X11R7.7/doc/libXt/intrinsics.html
>
> Describes:
>
> typedef struct _XtActionsRec {
> String string;
> XtActionProc proc;
> } XtActionsRec, *XtActionList;
>
> being initialized with:
>
>
> XtActionsRec actionT
21 matches
Mail list logo
