Let me preface by saying that I don't like the entire idea of
provenpackagers and feel that that role should belong to a SIG (either a
relevant SIG to the package, *or* some "package ems" SIG.
On 12/14/24 2:33 AM, Josh Stone wrote:
On Tuesday (2024-12-10), the Fedora Engineering Steering Commi
Neal Gompa composed on 2024-12-13 19:59 (UTC-0500):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/385
>> GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler black screen when KMS enabled
>> No local I/O is possible once KMS engages.
>> 6.11.11-300.fc41.x86_64 produces the same problem as all ot
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241213.n.1
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241214.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 11
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 1:33 AM Josh Stone wrote:
On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 1:33 AM Josh Stone wrote:
> As a result of more than a month of debate in the latest
> private FESCo ticket on his conduct, the Committee voted – seven in
> favor, two against – to remove Peter from the provenpackager gr
On Tuesday (2024-12-10), the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee
(FESCo) met in a private meeting to discuss whether Fedora contributor
Peter Robinson should retain his provenpackager privileges. Over the
last year, multiple private tickets have been opened with FESCo
regarding Peter’s packaging
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 4:25 PM Felix Miata wrote:
>
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/385
> GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler black screen when KMS enabled
> No local I/O is possible once KMS engages.
>
> 6.11.11-300.fc41.x86_64 produces the same problem as all other post-6.6
> kernels.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/nouveau/-/issues/385
GK107 10de:0fc1 Kepler black screen when KMS enabled
No local I/O is possible once KMS engages.
6.11.11-300.fc41.x86_64 produces the same problem as all other post-6.6 kernels.
6.6.63 in Tumbleweed is working just dandy. No distros' current k
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241212.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241213.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 31
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
Hello.
I'm orphaning imlib2 (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/imlib2). I didn't do
much with it for quite some time both as an user or a packager. No current
co-maintainer is interested in taking it over.
Regards,
--
Tomáš Smetana
--
___
devel mail
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:15:46PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:07:00PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16.
> > >
> > > Affected pa
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:07:00PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16.
> >
> > Affected packages are:
> > gvfs
> > qemu
> > vlc
> > xine-lib
> > kodi (RPM Fusion)
> > mpd (
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16.
>
> Affected packages are:
> gvfs
> qemu
> vlc
> xine-lib
> kodi (RPM Fusion)
> mpd (RPM Fusion)
>
> Affected packagers are all CC'ed.
>
> I have requested a side tag and buil
Hello list,
I've been tinkering with how I could make the NodeJS (22) spec file
better for a few months now off and on; it kind-of turned into a
complete re-write and partial re-design.
Before going away for my Christmas time off,
I decided to throw the current state out for scrutiny and feedback.
Hi,
libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16.
Affected packages are:
gvfs
qemu
vlc
xine-lib
kodi (RPM Fusion)
mpd (RPM Fusion)
Affected packagers are all CC'ed.
I have requested a side tag and built libnfs there. One can use it with:
fedpkg build --target=f42-build-side-102002
I'll try and
14 matches
Mail list logo
