Fedora eln compose report: 20241019.n.0 changes

2024-10-18 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241018.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20241019.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 25 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Re: Helped wanted with tricky potential F41 blocker

2024-10-18 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 10/18/24 5:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 17:10 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Can anyone get a metadata image (e2image -Q /path/to/root/device >> image.qcow2) post-upgrade, >> before reboot tries to run fsck and fix things? > > I tried, here you go: > https://bugzilla.re

Re: Helped wanted with tricky potential F41 blocker

2024-10-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 17:10 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Can anyone get a metadata image (e2image -Q /path/to/root/device image.qcow2) > post-upgrade, > before reboot tries to run fsck and fix things? I tried, here you go: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318710#c20 https://bugzilla.r

Re: Helped wanted with tricky potential F41 blocker

2024-10-18 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 10/18/24 5:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 17:10 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Can anyone get a metadata image (e2image -Q /path/to/root/device >> image.qcow2) post-upgrade, >> before reboot tries to run fsck and fix things? > > I tried, here you go: > https://bugzilla.re

Re: Helped wanted with tricky potential F41 blocker

2024-10-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 17:10 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 10/18/24 4:42 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hey folks! I'm sending up a flare for help with a potential F41 blocker > > that looks pretty tricky. It is > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318710 . > > > > The problem is fair

Re: Help wanted with another tricky potential F41 blocker

2024-10-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2024-10-18 at 16:57 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > If anybody has any grand ideas, we also don't know what's wrong in this > issue: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316066 > > My best guess is that some component is looking at wall clock time when > monotonic time is

Re: Helped wanted with tricky potential F41 blocker

2024-10-18 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 10/18/24 4:42 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey folks! I'm sending up a flare for help with a potential F41 blocker > that looks pretty tricky. It is > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318710 . > > The problem is fairly easy to reproduce. Install Fedora 40 or 41 Beta > with an ext4 r

Help wanted with another tricky potential F41 blocker

2024-10-18 Thread Michael Catanzaro
If anybody has any grand ideas, we also don't know what's wrong in this issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316066 My best guess is that some component is looking at wall clock time when monotonic time is required, causing D-Bus calls or systemd service activation to time out.

Helped wanted with tricky potential F41 blocker

2024-10-18 Thread Adam Williamson
Hey folks! I'm sending up a flare for help with a potential F41 blocker that looks pretty tricky. It is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318710 . The problem is fairly easy to reproduce. Install Fedora 40 or 41 Beta with an ext4 root partition, take a snapshot (for convenience in testi

Re: What happened to the dnf makecache timer with dnf5?

2024-10-18 Thread Gordon Messmer
I've opened https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2319828 and https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnf5/pull-request/86 for further discussion of a temporary fix.  I'll follow up with a PR on the dnf5 project shortly. -- ___ devel mailing list --

Re: What happened to the dnf makecache timer with dnf5?

2024-10-18 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 2024-10-18 1:32 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: V Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:05:49AM -0700, Gordon Messmer napsal(a): dnf < 5 includes /usr/lib/systemd/system/dnf-makecache.service and ".timer" to ensure that metadata is usually already cached when users run dnf. I don't see any makecache service or time

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-10-18 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 2:43 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2024-10-18 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > > > The meeting will

Re: Improvements in name resolution, DNS and HTTPS RR and SVCB future usage

2024-10-18 Thread Petr Menšík
Is there any API description of the Varlink API, which you are referring to? I have found: - https://systemd.io/WRITING_RESOLVER_CLIENTS/ - https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/latest/org.freedesktop.resolve1.html - https://systemd.io/USER_GROUP_API/ None of that mentions the raw

Fedora 41 compose report: 20241018.n.0 changes

2024-10-18 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-41-20241017.n.1 NEW: Fedora-41-20241018.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 13 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of

Orphaned python-genty

2024-10-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello, I just orphaned python-genty. It used to be needed by python-flaky long time ago, but it is a leaf package now. If you want to take it, please remove the usage of python setup.py test: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2319661 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 Fedora Matrix: mhronco

Orphaned python-simplegeneric

2024-10-18 Thread Miro Hrončok
Hello, I just orphaned python-simplegeneric. It used to be needed by ipython, spyder, sagemath long time ago, but it is a leaf package now. If you want to take it, please remove the usage of python setup.py test: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2319717 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800

Re: What happened to the dnf makecache timer with dnf5?

2024-10-18 Thread Petr Pisar
V Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 10:05:49AM -0700, Gordon Messmer napsal(a): > dnf < 5 includes /usr/lib/systemd/system/dnf-makecache.service and ".timer" > to ensure that metadata is usually already cached when users run dnf. > > I don't see any makecache service or timer in any of the dnf5 packages on > F

Re: Improvements in name resolution, DNS and HTTPS RR and SVCB future usage

2024-10-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 17.10.24 18:11, Petr Menšík (pemen...@redhat.com) wrote: > > I certainly have answered the questions you raised for *myself*, > > though I am pretty sure you are not going to like my answer: I think > > the Varlink IPC APIs that systemd-resolved implements are the way to > > go. There's wor