On Чцв, 10 кас 2024, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 5:23 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 17:29 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 09.10.24 11:12, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> >
>
> This was again a reference to the fact that IPA folks aren't willi
Hey Folks,
As the GA date comes closer; we are trying to test the last few bits in
Fedora. Fedora
takes pride in smooth upgrades and to ensure this we host Upgrade Test
Day[0].
This time we are hosting it from 2024-10-11 through 2024-10-15. This
installment
of test day is, however, a bit special,
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241010.n.1
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241011.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 2
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 21.05 KiB
Size of dropped packages:450.45 KiB
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 5:23 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 17:29 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mi, 09.10.24 11:12, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > This was again a reference to the fact that IPA folks aren't willing
> > to restrict their allocations
Hello Pythonistas,
The old %py3_build and %py3_install macros (201x-era) as documented in [1] use
a deprecated feature of setuptools.
It is highly recommended to use the current %pyproject macros instead as
documented in [2] and [3] sooner than it becomes necessary.
To help you convert your
On Thu, 2024-10-10 at 17:29 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 09.10.24 11:12, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> >
>
> This was again a reference to the fact that IPA folks aren't willing
> to restrict their allocations to some reasonable UID range, as
> mentoined elsewhere in this
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241009.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241010.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 13
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 37
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 33.82 MiB
Size of dropped packages:671.76 KiB
On Mi, 09.10.24 20:17, Fedora Development ML (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org)
wrote:
> Am 09.10.24 um 17:12 schrieb Simo Sorce:
> > > Hence I am very curious where you think the security issues are?
> > Sorry, I did not mean in any way to imply there are open security issue
> > with systemd-homed,
On Mi, 09.10.24 11:12, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > I am pretty sure the security model is a lot cleaner than anything the
> > sssd/IPA world would do, because we lock disk encryption to user
> > provided credentials, FIDO2/PKCS#11 and such, and can suspend the home
> > dir's encryption
On Thu, Oct 10 2024 at 11:25:30 AM +02:00:00, Alexander Sosedkin
wrote:
Don't Panic.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/firefox lists 131.0-2 in all
branches,
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=37 lists a
dozen of 131.0-2 builds as well.
Sent from a
$ rpm -q firefox
fir
OLD: Fedora-41-20241009.n.0
NEW: Fedora-41-20241010.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 9
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:10
Upgraded packages: 80
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.81 MiB
Size of dropped packages:18.74 MiB
On 10/9/24 14:52, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mi, 09.10.24 12:56, Pavel Březina (pbrez...@redhat.com) wrote:
Hi Fedora,
nss-altfiles is not currently part of the default installation and can be
optionally added to nsswitch.conf via authselect's with-altfiles.
This however breaks ostree compos
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241009.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20241010.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 8
Added packages: 15
Dropped packages:10
Upgraded packages: 356
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 4.10 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:25:30AM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:19 AM Marius Schwarz
> wrote:
> > I checked Koji and there seems no build in process to fix this 0-Day
> > exploitation in firefix
> >
> > https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2024-5
Hi all,
the newest version of Ghostscript arrived into rawhide and there is a
change in default behavior of ghostscript.
In the past Ghostscript Postscript interpreter allowed setting of output
device in the incoming Postscript file, which was one of sources of CVEs
in the past. This type of
Hi there,
Am Do., 10. Okt. 2024 um 11:19 Uhr schrieb Marius Schwarz
:
>
> Hi,
>
> I checked Koji and there seems no build in process to fix this 0-Day
> exploitation in firefix
>
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2024-51/
>
...
They've been built and submitted for stable ye
Hi,
Sorry, case closed.
best regards,
Marius Schwarz*
*
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/projec
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:19 AM Marius Schwarz wrote:
> I checked Koji and there seems no build in process to fix this 0-Day
> exploitation in firefix
>
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2024-51/
>
> The "News" about it is already out and exploited:
>
> Mozilla has revealed
Hi,
I checked Koji and there seems no build in process to fix this 0-Day
exploitation in firefix
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2024-51/
The "News" about it is already out and exploited:
Mozilla has revealed that a critical security flaw impacting Firefox and
Firefox
19 matches
Mail list logo
