On 10/8/24 10:09 AM, Barry Scott wrote:
Now I have systemd .src.rpm installed next I needed the build deps
so that I can do a rpmbuild.
$ sudo dnf builddep systemd.spec
[sudo] password for barry:
Updating and loading repositories:
Fedora 41 - aarch64
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241008.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241009.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 15
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 391.40 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024, at 1:14 PM, Barry Scott wrote:
> I like the idea of being able to reinstall and keep the /home.
> But I'd rather not use systemd-homed to get the feature.
It's an explicit feature request for the new installer's "Guided" partitioning
path. The current UI (also for Fedora 4
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024, at 11:59 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 07.10.24 20:55, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
>> And at least on my setup with many read-only snapshots in
>> ~/, permissions changes wouldn't be permitted, even by the root
>> user.
>
> Not sure I grok what yo
OLD: Fedora-41-20241007.n.0
NEW: Fedora-41-20241008.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:17
Upgraded packages: 196
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 271.03 KiB
Size of dropped packages:60.80 MiB
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241007.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20241008.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 8
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:19
Upgraded packages: 269
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.28 MiB
Size of dropped packages
> On 8 Oct 2024, at 21:08, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 08. 10. 24 v 7:09 odp. Barry Scott napsal(a):
>> Now I have systemd .src.rpm installed next I needed the build deps
>> so that I can do a rpmbuild.
>
> Are you sure you want to install it on your workstation. The good habit is to
> NOT
Dne 08. 10. 24 v 7:09 odp. Barry Scott napsal(a):
Now I have systemd .src.rpm installed next I needed the build deps
so that I can do a rpmbuild.
Are you sure you want to install it on your workstation. The good habit is to NOT install builddeps and NOT running
rpmbuild directly, but running
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 09:34:06PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 08. 10. 24 21:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:19:52PM +0200, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > On the verge to speed up installability test in CI we are proposing this
> > > change to speed
On 08. 10. 24 21:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:19:52PM +0200, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote:
Hi folks,
On the verge to speed up installability test in CI we are proposing this
change to speed up significantly the testing:
https://github.com/fedora-ci/installability-pipeline/
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:19:52PM +0200, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> On the verge to speed up installability test in CI we are proposing this
> change to speed up significantly the testing:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-ci/installability-pipeline/pull/38
>
> We would like to te
Text Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-10-08/fesco.2024-10-08-17.01.log.txt
HTML Log:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-10-08/fesco.2024-10-08-17.01.log.html
Text Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_m
> On 4 Oct 2024, at 16:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I was recently doing a bunch of test reinstalls of Fedora [1],
> looking to see if it's complicated to retain the user directories
> during a reinstall. The answer is, sadly, that it's possible only with
> some
Now I have systemd .src.rpm installed next I needed the build deps
so that I can do a rpmbuild.
$ sudo dnf builddep systemd.spec
[sudo] password for barry:
Updating and loading repositories:
Fedora 41 - aarch64
100% | 99.3 KiB/s | 18.3
> On 8 Oct 2024, at 13:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Or `dnf remove rpm-plugin-ima`.
> It doesn't look like it's a hard dependency of anything vital.
This is what I did and that fixed it, as expected.
Barry
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lis
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:35 PM Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Di, 08.10.24 12:23, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:19 PM Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Di, 08.10.24 18:07, Fedora Development ML
> > > (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org)
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> I am pretty sure all files inside of a home dir should carry the same
> selinux label, identifying it as a user's file.
That's incorrect, as there are a variety of restricted things, starting
as basic as SSH keys and authorized hosts.
--
Chris Adams
On Tuesday 8 October 2024 17:07:53 BST Kilian Hanich via devel wrote:
> Am 08.10.24 um 17:32 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>
> > For example, I am fundamentally opposed to the model
> > these systems generally pursue of turning UID numbers into centrally,
> > organization-wide managed concepts.
>
>
Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> Oh, that hasn't been the case for a long time anymore. Nowadays files
> on disk are owned by the "nobody" user always, and idmapped mounts are
> used to map them transiently to the UID/GID assigned to the user on
> the local machine.
How do rootless co
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 6:32 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio,
>
> > > rust-sval @rust-sig, orphan0
> > > weeks ago
> > > rust-sval_buffer @rust-sig, orphan0
> > > weeks ago
> > > rust-sval_derive @rust
On Di, 08.10.24 12:23, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:19 PM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> >
> > On Di, 08.10.24 18:07, Fedora Development ML
> > (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org) wrote:
> >
> > > Am 08.10.24 um 17:32 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > > >
Hi Fabio,
> > rust-sval @rust-sig, orphan0 weeks
> > ago
> > rust-sval_buffer @rust-sig, orphan0 weeks
> > ago
> > rust-sval_derive @rust-sig, orphan0 weeks
> > ago
> > rust-sval_derive_mac
On Di, 08.10.24 09:24, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 9:22 AM Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 7 2024 at 12:59:46 PM -04:00:00, Simo Sorce
> > wrote:
> > > Changing a default like this is not something to do lightly IMHO.
> >
> > I'm interested in
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 6:07 PM wrote:
(snip)
> rust-sval @rust-sig, orphan0 weeks ago
> rust-sval_buffer @rust-sig, orphan0 weeks ago
> rust-sval_derive @rust-sig, orphan0 weeks ago
> rust-s
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 12:19 PM Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Di, 08.10.24 18:07, Fedora Development ML (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org)
> wrote:
>
> > Am 08.10.24 um 17:32 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > > For example, I am fundamentally opposed to the model
> > > these systems generally pursu
On Di, 08.10.24 18:07, Fedora Development ML (devel@lists.fedoraproject.org)
wrote:
> Am 08.10.24 um 17:32 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > For example, I am fundamentally opposed to the model
> > these systems generally pursue of turning UID numbers into centrally,
> > organization-wide managed c
On Mo, 07.10.24 14:15, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/pull/939#issuecomment-1409217811
> > > No follow up happened on that, sadly.
> > >
> > > I do not see any work done on that yet. Without having SELinux support
> > > properl
Am 08.10.24 um 17:32 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
For example, I am fundamentally opposed to the model
these systems generally pursue of turning UID numbers into centrally,
organization-wide managed concepts.
Wait a second, some organization have more than 70k people (and in this
day and age, the
Report started at 2024-10-08 15:56:01 UTC
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_
On Mo, 07.10.24 20:55, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> > What happens if there are conflicts of uid or gid ?
>
> uid/gid are recursively changed at mount time to avoid
> conflicts. For large homes, this could result in a lot of metadata
> writes.
Oh, that hasn't been the case for
On Mo, 07.10.24 12:59, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > The homed approach would make other things possible too. For example,
> > sharing of /home in dual-boot scenarios. Right now a manual setup
> > needs to be done, and login details need to be propagated each time,
> > but with homed, du
On Sa, 05.10.24 10:53, Alexander Bokovoy (aboko...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > The homed approach would make other things possible too. For example,
> > sharing of /home in dual-boot scenarios. Right now a manual setup
> > needs to be done, and login details need to be propagated each time,
> > but wit
On Mo, 07.10.24 20:42, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> > You should be able to combine the three sources of users freely
> > without problems – if you like. But these three sources of user
> > definitions should be on similar footing, and not try to abstract each
> > other.
> >
> >
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Tuesday at 17:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2024-10-08 17:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to be
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 08:22 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7 2024 at 12:59:46 PM -04:00:00, Simo Sorce
> wrote:
> > Changing a default like this is not something to do lightly IMHO.
>
> I'm interested in systemd-homed because we currently have no other
> plausible path towards en
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 9:22 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 7 2024 at 12:59:46 PM -04:00:00, Simo Sorce
> wrote:
> > Changing a default like this is not something to do lightly IMHO.
>
> I'm interested in systemd-homed because we currently have no other
> plausible path towards encryp
On Mon, Oct 7 2024 at 12:59:46 PM -04:00:00, Simo Sorce
wrote:
Changing a default like this is not something to do lightly IMHO.
I'm interested in systemd-homed because we currently have no other
plausible path towards encryption of user data by default [1] (since
use of LUKS full-disk encry
We decided to move off of Discord to matrix, to be better supporting of
Open Source projects.
https://matrix.to/#/#ramalama:fedoraproject.org
RamaLama is a new project to allow use of AI Models easier.
ramalama run MODEL
Will pull down a model from HuggingFace, Ollama or an OCI Container
Reg
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 3:43 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 1:13 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > It's that time of the year again - pointing out packages that are at a
> > lower version in Fedora 41 (branched) than Fedora 40 (stable).
> > For those that are
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 14:32 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 2:27 PM Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >
> > At least for now, use rpm "--noplugins" option to avoid writing the file
> > signatures.
>
> Or `dnf remove rpm-plugin-ima`.
> It doesn't look like it's a hard dependency of anyth
Hi,
In the near future I will rebase utf8proc to 2.9.0 in rawhide. This change
introduced SONAME
bump, thus I created a side tag so all dependent packages can be rebuilt. I
also submitted
bugs for the affected packages. So if you received such a bug please do a
rebuild.
Thanks for the cooperation
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 11:02 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Peter Robinson writes:
>
> Hello Peter and Adam,
>
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > > I noticed that the vesa and fbdev X.org drivers were recently
> > > retired
> > > from Rawhide. There appears to be no Change for this. The commit
>
>
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 2:27 PM Mimi Zohar wrote:
>
> At least for now, usse rpm "--noplugins" option to avoid writing the file
> signatures.
Or `dnf remove rpm-plugin-ima`.
It doesn't look like it's a hard dependency of anything vital.
Fabio
--
___
de
At least for now, usse rpm "--noplugins" option to avoid writing the file
signatures.
Mimi
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://do
Hi folks,
On the verge to speed up installability test in CI we are proposing this
change to speed up significantly the testing:
https://github.com/fedora-ci/installability-pipeline/pull/38
We would like to test drive this change for Fedora CI first.
Please provide the feedback to this PR,
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 12:14 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 10/6/24 12:42 AM, Barry wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 5 Oct 2024, at 18:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > >
> > > On the other hand, the error message you're seeing is from the IMA
> > > plugin. So I assume you've enabled rpm-plugin-ima?
>
On 10/6/24 12:42 AM, Barry wrote:
On 5 Oct 2024, at 18:32, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On the other hand, the error message you're seeing is from the IMA plugin. So I
assume you've enabled rpm-plugin-ima?
This a f39 aarch64 upgraded to f40 then f41 with no customisations.
(There are no f40 or
Peter Robinson writes:
Hello Peter and Adam,
> Hi Adam,
>
>> I noticed that the vesa and fbdev X.org drivers were recently retired
>> from Rawhide. There appears to be no Change for this. The commit
I remember that there was a Change for this filed by Ajax some time ago:
https://fedoraproject.
48 matches
Mail list logo
