OLD: Fedora-eln-20241004.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241005.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 10
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
# F10 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2024-10-07
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location:
https://matrix.to/#/#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org
Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 41 blocker review meeting! We have 5
proposed blockers and 1 proposed freeze exceptio
On Wed, Oct 2, 2024 at 8:07 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Now that the updated ffmpeg and tesseract landed in Rawhide[1], we
> will bring it back into F41 for simplifying maintenance over the next
> year. The list of packages being brought back are in the Bodhi
> update[1] and we expect to
Hi Daniel,
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> I've been maintainer of the yajl package in Fedora forever, as it was
> a dep of libvirt.
>
> yajl upstream has been dead since 2015, so the current release tarball
> has multiple CVEs, which I've patched downstream by grabbing patches
> from github issue
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 12:13 AM Fedora ELN Report
wrote:
>
> OLD: Fedora-eln-20241002.n.1
> NEW: Fedora-eln-20241003.n.0
>
> = SUMMARY =
> Added images:0
> Dropped images: 0
> Added packages: 0
> Dropped packages:0
> Upgraded packages: 0
> Downgraded packages: 0
FY
Hi all,
I've just built fwupd 2.0.0 into rawhide, which bumps the libfwupd soname from
libfwupd.so.2 to libfwupd.so.3. I've rebuilt gnome-firmware, gnome-software and
plasma-discover in the f42-build-side-97511 side tag with no issue, and have
created a bodhi update with all 4 builds here:
htt
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241003.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241004.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 287
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:6.69 MiB
Size of
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 11:36 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 11:20:48AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > When this was first explored a few years ago, the main problem that
> > came up was that homed is functionally incompatible with centralized
> > login systems (SSS
On 10/4/24 11:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi folks,
I was recently doing a bunch of test reinstalls of Fedora [1],
looking to see if it's complicated to retain the user directories
during a reinstall. The answer is, sadly, that it's possible only with
some manual tinkering. This is a
On Fri, Oct 04, 2024 at 11:20:48AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> When this was first explored a few years ago, the main problem that
> came up was that homed is functionally incompatible with centralized
> login systems (SSSD to FreeIPA/AD, OIDC, etc.). If this has changed,
> then it would make sense
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 11:05 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I was recently doing a bunch of test reinstalls of Fedora [1],
> looking to see if it's complicated to retain the user directories
> during a reinstall. The answer is, sadly, that it's possible only with
> some ma
Hi folks,
I was recently doing a bunch of test reinstalls of Fedora [1],
looking to see if it's complicated to retain the user directories
during a reinstall. The answer is, sadly, that it's possible only with
some manual tinkering. This is a known problem [2].
With a little bit of trickery, Anac
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 11:23:34AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> On 3.09.2024 10:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > You have some other issue as all those rpmfusion dep issues are bogus.
>
> Thanks for pointing it out. Sorted out rpmfusion issues.
>
> Two problems left:
>
> Problem 1: package a
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 07:52:47AM +, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package ghc-foldable1-classes-compat-0.1-4.fc40.x86_64 from
> @System requires libHSarray-0.5.4.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit), but none of the
> providers can be installed
Already resolved, https://bugzilla.redhat.c
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 11:37:04AM -, Kanitha Chim wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package cdn-utils-1.162-1.fc40eng.noarch from @System requires
> python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
> Problem 2: package engproduct-cli-1.36-1.fc40eng.noarch from @System
> requires
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 01:25:35PM +0200, Cristian Le via devel wrote:
> On my system I get an exiv2/krita issue and a re2 issue:
>
> ```
> Error:
> Problem 1: problem with installed package krita-5.2.2-7.fc40.x86_64
> - package krita-5.2.2-11.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires
I have krita-5.2.
Neal Gompa wrote on 2024/10/04 21:58:
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 9:57 AM Rix, Tom wrote:
I can help
Please see the open BZ's for blender on F40.
I have been looking at an issue in F40 that is an issue with clang17.
Blender uses several projects that use clang-devel. ROCm uses, normally
clang-dev
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 11:08:58AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> I have three machines running F40; here are the results:
>
> #1
> Error:
> Problem 1: package module-build-service-3.9.2-9.fc41.noarch from fedora
> requires python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be i
On Thu, Oct 3, 2024 at 9:57 AM Rix, Tom wrote:
>
> I can help
> Please see the open BZ's for blender on F40.
> I have been looking at an issue in F40 that is an issue with clang17.
> Blender uses several projects that use clang-devel. ROCm uses, normally
> clang-devel.
> There is a conflict at r
On Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 12:42:30PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Thu, Oct 03, 2024 at 09:30:34AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > Good Morning Everyone,
> >
> > We have been emailing daily the following user to notify that the email they
> > have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bu
20 matches
Mail list logo
